Topic: Nintendo Switch 2 Predictions

When you have fans asking for payment options...I'm not surprised Capcom ans Squaresoft are becoming more western lol. We are idiots! Cynics are usually against stuff like that, not championing them hahaha! It's also nauseating how Youtubers claim things make perfect sense because they can make a quick buck from it, especially when they complain about it in another video lol.

I really hope that I am wrong, and there's no paywall around upgrading visuals....to be clear. I can see it as a way to push online subscriptions is my only point. I'm with you @skywake

You know what's kinda nice about scrolling through these kinds of threads? Nobody is asking for Dolby Atmos. It seems despite all the hype that Dolby has largely failed to be high on anyone's lists when it comes to console wishlists. Maybe that's partly due to the kind of demographic that Nintendo attracts but even so, still nice to see that nobody really cares

Basically if I was to rank the things that the newer HDMI standards open up in terms of how much they matter for gaming? I'd go something along the lines of:
1. eARC allowing 5.1 LPCM for greater 5.1 surround hardware compatibility
2. VRR
3. HDR
4. Higher Refresh rate modes
5. Higher Resolution modes
6. Dynamic HDR
7. Dolby Atmos

To often it feels like people flip that list entirely......

@skywake I honestly have never even heard of Atmos or eARC. I just looked them up and yeah, I don't really care. But I think you probably assumed I wouldn't given what I've already said on this topic.

As for the forum and the Nintendo fanbase as a whole, I don't think many Nintendo fans really care about graphics either, I don't really see much if any discussion on graphics and performance here aside from you. I think most of us are here for the gameplay and are more concerned with what games are going to be on the console, how many of them they can play without having to buy extra storage, and how differently they're going to play from the OG Switch.

People do like good graphics but most people just want functioning and good looking art and performance without worrying about the details.

Is part of what makes Peach Showtime good the fact that it has beautiful graphics and lighting? Yes. Would the game be even better if it looked just as good in handheld and if the loading screens didn't look like PowerPoint slides? Also yes. Between subtleties like that and just wanting some of the PC games to even exist on Switch (or Switch 2) and look and run decently, I doubt most people care about the 'how'.

@Bolt_Strike
eARC is the difference between having surround sound or not across devices and with formats other than heavily compressed DD or, with rare support from TVs, DTS. If you need it for surround sound it matters. If you have a full on surround setup or are fine with your TV speakers it doesn't

For me eARC is the difference between 5.1 and stereo. When done well, like Metroid Prime Remastered, it's a huge boost to the experience. Upgrading to 5.1 is, IMO, the single biggest upgrade to gaming I've done in two decades. More than the Switch being portable. More than HDR. Certainly more than 4K or 120Hz. More than getting an OLED. Arguably more than the jump to HD. eARC is how I got there on Nintendo's hardware

Atmos is, especially in this context, just a way for Dolby to extract licencing fees from manufacturers. But given how most people seem to gush about it you'd think it was some kind of revolutionary change. It isn't. Unless you spent 10s of 1000s on Audio or game in a cinema it doesn't matter

Also note, given your reply, the order I put these items in. You're here saying I'm the only one caring about graphics (not true) but you're saying it in response to a post where I put "higher resolution modes" towards the bottom of the post of things that matter out of these new HDMI features. Features the Switch 2 will almost surely have to some degree because that's just the standard now. These are by far the lowest hanging fruit for predictions

At the top of my list, bellow eARC which I just explained, was VRR which is a way to make lower and more inconsistent framerates appear more stable. I'm literally saying the ability for it to be LESS powerful and overcome it somewhat with VRR is more important than things like 4K or 120Hz

Remember the supposed leaked Switch 2 name "Switch Attach" a few months ago? Well, I think that might actually be the real name for the Switch 2. And the reason why I think that is because 1. the Switch 2 joy cons will magnetically "attach" to the new console unlike the rail mechanism used on the current Switch consoles, and 2. Nintendo might add a feature where you can attach a second screen onto the main handheld system, resembling the Nintendo 3DS in a way, but there hasn't been that many rumors about this second features other than that patent we got.

Also, regarding the announcement for the Switch 2, Nintendo said they'll announce it FY2025 or no later than March 2025. But since Nintendo is aiming for a March 2025 launch for the system, they'll probably announce the Switch 2 in August or September. Also, we can expect Metroid Prime 4 to launch around this holiday.

If Switch Attach is the name it might as well be named Switch U

Switch Attach sounds like a mistranslation of a much saner name Switch Connect which has been suggested on this site before. That said, I could legitimately imagine a Switch Connect existing with some of what you are describing.

My Nintendo Switch Successor Predictions:

• Backwards Compatibility
• Shares the same NSO service (however may have an updated version)
• 256 GB of storage
• Improved UI
• Bigger screen
• Internally significantly more powerful than Switch

@PikminMarioKirby I agree fully with all of this. I think Nintendo are (hopefully!) astute enough to realise that the Switch is an incredible concept, with market data attesting to its incredible impact within the gaming community.

They just need to go slightly 'bigger and better' to have a win here.

I think they will also lean heavily into backwards compatibility, as an enticement for current Switch owners to 'upgrade' and/or replace their current kit.

Power-wise, I imagine and hope for something that is SteamDeck level. Currently playing Elden Ring on the deck, which is an amazing experience... potential Switch2 launch title?!

I'd like to see Nintendo Fusion come to, Switch 2 with a dock containing a EXT GPU to boost those graphics BAM! Nintendo fusion!

256GB could fit both Baldur's Gate 3 and Genshin Impact! If they compress the games smaller than the PC versions, it could even fit a third game also.

I'm really hoping we get 512GB; 256 just doesn't last anymore, especially if we are expecting some AAA third party ports on Switch 2. I would want 1TB but that is probably wishful thinking. Sure, I'll add a 1TB SD card also, but not everyone will want to buy an SD card just for a few games.

@FishyS deff looking forward to bigger GPU titles on Switch 2, BC3 just to name one. Would also like to see something like Playstation did with the "game boost" play some of the old titles with boosted FPS

The fact that Switch 2 will use magnetic Joy Cons, it gave the hint that Switch 2 will be looks similar as old Switch model.

@FishyS
I've said it before but I think 256GB is a fairly conservative guess. Then again Nintendo is a fairly conservative company so who knows. I think you're right that 1TB is unlikely (although less crazy than it sounds to old ears) but 512GB I think is very probable. Whatever it has though, microSD cards are cheap and it will have hardware file compression so it probably won't be a huge issue

• 2 SKUs on launch: one all-digital with 512GB internal memory, one with cartridge support and 256GB internal memory
• Backwards compatible digitally and with physical games
• 7" 1080p LCD screen
• Hall-effect joysticks
• Slightly redesigned form factor on Joy-Cons for better grip
• Removal of IR-sensor
• New gimmick: back camera for AR-supported games

@steruphan
The Lite makes sense as a cheaper SKU is because by disabling the dock functionality they can use lower grade SoCs that don't perform as well. The digital only SKUs on XB and PS make sense because by omitting the optical drive you're significantly reducing bulk (shipping) and not having to include a UHD BluRay Drive. Which isn't a cheap component

None of these benefits exist for a digital only SKU for a cartridge based console. The cost of the cartridge slot is near zero and there's no reason to limit a SKU in such a way. I'd say the odds of a digital only SKU existing are close to 0. It makes no sense. If there are multiple SKUs it will be differentiated in the same way the existing Switch SKUs are divided. Screen, storage, performance

@skywake
Maybe. But Nintendo doesn't always make sense, does it? 😂

Edit: I think they might try it to incentivize going all digital.

@FishyS I would also rather 512 GB, but keep in mind normal Switch only has 32 GB (OLED has 64 GB) so they usually don't care about it too much. However since the Switch's launch it seems as if storage is cheaper so it wouldn't be too expensive to hit at least 256GB.

@CJD87 I think Nintendo will want a few major 3rd party games near launch, so possibly? I could also see Monster Hunter Wilds being a big port as well.