Forums

Topic: Unpopular Gaming Opinions

Posts 11,421 to 11,440 of 13,094

Sunsy

@Link-Hero I was thinking of the official ways of playing PC and console games, yes, I do know that. While I haven't tried it with my GameCube games, I do use emulation for Sega Genesis stuff. The Steam releases give you the ROM, I prefer playing them in a lightweight Genesis emulator instead of the one graphically heavy one Sega provides.

The resident Trolls superfan! Saw Trolls Band Together via early access and absolutely loved it!

DanijoEX

Unpopular opinion.

No matter how many people say going digital is better. I just shake my head at this.

But one thing for certain though...and here's the lick: even with digital, ya'll still need a "physical medium" to access them. PC's are just as physical as consoles are. You still need'em to access your digital games, right? Did anyone actually had this moment of clarity before? Like I did a few years ago?

Honestly, physcial will be around for long time whether you like it or not. Heck, I need my laptop to play Genesis games on a emulator. And that's my take on that. Just do keep in mind...that not everyone has the money to buy PC's all the time.

I sell my famous Chesapeake Tupperware.
I ACCEPT NO DEBIT CARDS!
DO YOU HEAR ME!?!

X:

Matt_Barber

@DanijoEX I might similarly call all games on cartridges as digital, on the grounds that all the data is digitally encoded. There you go, physical = digital, it's all the same. Don't know why anyone make such a fuss about it. 😊

Seriously, I'm all for the continuation of physical media and would see it as a good thing that the mainstream market tends away from it.

Things like better packaging, printed manuals, meaningful extras - like soundtracks and art books - and getting the entire game on the cartridge become far more likely when the only people buying are those who really care about that. If the sort of people who'd shy off paying a few bucks extra to get them switch to downloads, streaming and subscriptions, it's for the better.

Matt_Barber

Jalex_64

Anti-Matter wrote:

Also, PC have tendency of short lived than console / handheld machines.

Erm, no. PCs are upgradeable, unlike consoles, which generally have a relevant lifespan of 4-7 years. The length of time before upgrading a PC will depend entirely on how cutting edge a machine you have to start with and how well you maintain it. A GTX 1080 Ti purchased in 2016 is still a very capable card in 2023, for example.

On top of this, your entire library of games are transferable to a new drive or entire system, allowing you to play your games with higher settings and framerates as your PC performance improves with better hardware. Even if you decide not to upgrade, you can downscale the graphics to reach a preferable framerate.

You can also back up your saves very easily, unlike the Switch which runs on a mobile battery that's very vulnerable to failure after 5+ years.

You only need to look at the number of Wii Us failing right now to see the reality.

Consoles have many plus points but a longer lifespan simply ain't one of them.

[Edited by Jalex_64]

Jalex_64

Matt_Barber

@Sunsy GameCube emulation is really good these days. The Dolphin emulator will play practically the entire library, with the only exceptions being obscure games that few people would care for. Mind you, this is the sort of forum where those few might hang out. 😉

You can get a lot of benefits through emulation such as HD upscaling, widescreen, and 60fps on many games that never originally supported them. Plus there are mods to improve texture quality and sometimes even add extra content to the more popular games.

You need a moderately decent PC to run it well, particularly if you want the upscaling. I can still play a lot of games on my GPD Win and 2015 vintage craptop, mind you, so it's not like running Cemu or RPCS3 where you'll need something very modern. Better hardware will still give better results though.

Also, you'll need a modded GameCube or Wii to rip the discs with. Other sources of games may exist, but I'm saying nothing. 🤐

Matt_Barber

Anti-Matter

@Jalex__64
My consoles I have such as Wii, PS2 Fat, PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim, etc have longer lifespan than my PC before I replaced my PC with laptop for more convenient working style.
My Wii is 17 years old, PS2 Slim = 16 years old, PS2 Fat = 18 years old, PS3 Slim = 13 years old and they are still working well until today.
My PC got busted oftenly when I have The Sims 3 PC, I could enjoy the game not more than 2 years. After I got more original games and video game machines, I completely stopped playing PC games in year 2014.
I don't even care with PC gaming anymore since then.

SKYBOXING Champion from 4 SKYBOXING LEGENDS.

Jalex_64

@Anti-Matter Yes but you are a sample of one. There is an entire world of people out there with differing experiences. You only need to look at how many retro gamers are maintaining PC's from the nineties or earlier on Youtube to see this. Alternatively, look at the number of articles about failing Wii U's.

Whether YOU care for PC gaming or not does not alter the reality.

[Edited by Jalex_64]

Jalex_64

Euler

Jalex__64 wrote:

@Anti-Matter Yes but you are a sample of one. There is an entire world of people out there with differing experiences. You only need to look at how many retro gamers are maintaining PC's from the nineties or earlier on Youtube to see this. Alternatively, look at the number of articles about failing Wii U's.
Whether YOU care for PC gaming or not does not alter the reality.

Lots of retro gamers maintain consoles from the 80s or earlier, and it goes without saying that many PCs from the 2010s are lemons or otherwise failing.

Euler

Jalex_64

@Euler I mentioned the 90's because that's when PC gaming really caught fire. The period holds a lot of nostalgia for people, which is exemplified by the amount of 90's retro systems being built and maintained right now.

Whether your claim about 2010's PCs failing is true or not (and I severely doubt it, as 90's PCs were far more vulnerable to static and other hazards compared to modern systems) the point still stands. A well built PC today has as good a chance of achieving a decent life as a modern console.

Each platform has had its quality control shifted over the decades, so it's impossible to vouch for either being the overall winner in this regard.

Jalex_64

Anti-Matter

@Jalex__64
But I personally prefer consoles and handhelds over than PC gaming for easy to play and longer lifespan than PC.
I don't even value any benefit from PC gaming.
This is my statement, I will not change my opinion whether you disagree or not.

SKYBOXING Champion from 4 SKYBOXING LEGENDS.

Matt_Barber

Euler wrote:

Lots of retro gamers maintain consoles from the 80s or earlier, and it goes without saying that many PCs from the 2010s are lemons or otherwise failing.

I'd think that the key word there is 'maintain.'

Neither consoles nor PCs are built to last more than about ten years. Getting twenty to thirty out of them isn't particularly unusual, although you can expect them to become somewhat less reliable toward the end of that period.

Anything from the 80s, well, you should have the power supply professionally tested or just buy a brand new replacement. All the capacitors should be inspected and replaced if necessary, along with any batteries it uses. You should also consider getting replacement ports and connectors, as well as mods to give it modern mass storage and video output. That's aside from any cosmetic stuff you might want to do for the ageing plastics.

I've recently done this to a C64C (around 1986 vintage) myself and, while it was a fun exercise to keep up my electronics skills, I wouldn't recommend it to the uninitiated. There are people who'll do a restoration job for you for a fee though.

That's not to say that there aren't still people using unmodified devices of this age. They are, however, running a risk of destroying them whenever they turn them on, as well as a not insignificant chance of shocking themselves and/or starting a fire. It's much the same with any electrical device, mind you; I don't think I'd recommend a 40 year old toaster either.

Matt_Barber

Sunsy

@Matt_Barber This is why the more I think about it, PC games last. I have old box copies of Half-Life 2 (with CS: Source), Half-Life 2: Episode One, and Counter-Strike Condition Zero from my old desktop days. They all carried over to my previous laptop, and my current gaming PC, all playable. I've had them for 18 years.

Same with GOG games on my previous laptop, they came over to my new PC. Plus being DRM-free, I can install from backups without being online or logged into GOG.

I'm not taking a dig at consoles, I love playing games on my Switch and Wii U. I can see why PC is better for longevity, I can still keep playing games I bought years ago.

The resident Trolls superfan! Saw Trolls Band Together via early access and absolutely loved it!

sunny63

I don't really need "Proper dungeons" in TotK. I was satisfied with the shrines, and yeah, the beasts were terrible, but the puzzles were good. Fix the problems with the beasts and I'll be happy. And nothing against dungeons (Halfway through Links Awakening and I love the puzzles) but if dungeons aren't there in TotK, I'll be one of the few people for whom this doesn't ruin the game.

sunny63

TheBigBlue

@sunny63 this makes sense. There are a hell of a lot of shrines in BOTW too. Over 100 of them. In your average Zelda title, I’d say there is about 3-5 core dungeons, not including the overworld and final boss areas. You’ll get more bang for your buck with more Shrines.

“FALCOOOOOOOOOON PUNCH”
-Solid Snake

VoidofLight

For me, the shrines were alright in concept, but it felt like they made too many of them while running out of concepts for puzzles. Most of the shrines are either combat or blessing shrines, with no puzzles being required. Another thing I wasn't a fan of was how sterile and samey all the shrines looked, along with the dungeons being the same way. I hope that if they bring back the shrine format, they look more unique, and that the dungeons aren't all the same look either.

"It is fate. Many have tried, yet none have ever managed to escape it's flow."

kkslider5552000

I'm not a huge fan of the storybook part of Super Mario Galaxy.

Like people bring up "oh some more story and you can experience it optionally, on your own, that's cool", and none of that's wrong, but I can't imagine a worse way to make me like the story. Making it a storybook being read, in chapters, is the most boring way this story could've been presented and it feels like the game has immediately stopped altogether for literal reading.

I think its more obvious now, when you look at indie platformers that can actually tell stories in their games in ways that feel remotely natural and don't make it feel like the game has abruptly stopped. I get why Miyamoto would be against it, because if it was required, I would be disappointed at how it was told. There's a reason optional story stuff in games is often actually directly from characters or maybe some subtle environmental details instead of "here's my backstory except I'm not gonna say its my back story, I'm just going to read a book".

But to be fair, I also often get bored of the books in Elder Scrolls games too.

Non-binary, demiguy, making LPs, still alive

Megaman Legends 2 Let's Play!:
LeT's PlAy MEGAMAN LEGENDS 2 < Link to LP

Matt_Barber

Maybe he'll see the light and we'll get Super Mario Gris sometime? 😃

I get the impression that he'd rather that his games had no story at all, and left everything to the player's imagination like in the NES days.

Matt_Barber

Anti-Matter

The hype of newest zelda game was too overrated in my opinion.

SKYBOXING Champion from 4 SKYBOXING LEGENDS.

TheBigBlue

I’m more pumped to see Ganondorf in the new Zelda trailer than anyone or anything else.

“FALCOOOOOOOOOON PUNCH”
-Solid Snake

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic