Animal rights organisation PETA has a long history of targeting Nintendo, having previously used titles such as 1-2-Switch, Pokémon and even Super Mario 3D Land to raise awareness of its cause.
Founded in 1980 by Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco, PETA – which stands for 'People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' – is a nonprofit corporation that has done much to raise awareness of the ill-treatment of animals all over the world. It is opposed to factory farming, fur farming, animal testing, and the use of animals in entertainment, but it also champions the vegan lifestyle and campaigns against the consumption of meat or fish, as well as the slaughter of animals which are regarded by many as pests.
The organisation's latest venture focused on Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, and while PETA has been criticised for opportunism in the past, it's fair to say that it has put an impressive amount of effort into this one.
Earlier this month, PETA issued a tweet that playfully mocked the “my uncle works at Nintendo” meme, posting 'leaked' images of the final Super Smash Bros. Ultimate 'Fighter's Pass' DLC character.
Before the wrestling fans out there get too excited, "Not a Nugget" isn't a tribute to the late, great Owen Hart, but a chick who packs some serious heat in his quest to remind people that "chickens are cool 3-dimensional animals, not food." He has previously appeared in some of PETA's other 'spoof' games.
PETA has even gone as far as to create a petition page that contains more information about the character – including the arsenal of weapons at his disposal.
Here's what the petition site has to say about the character:
For those who exploit and harm animals for personal gain, "Not a Nugget" is the definition of "a new foe." As a downloadable fighter in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, he could use his wits, wings, and beak (plus a trick or two tucked under his feathers) to pummel opponents and really pack a punch. What's more, his peak physical skills would serve to send a positive message to millions of people around the world about the benefits of going vegan and being kind to animals.
"Not a Nugget" would show gamers around the globe that smashing speciesism is a worthwhile goal to fight for. He could even have his own custom stage—perhaps a farm packed with some of the horrifying, real-world threats that millions of animals are enduring right now. Most importantly, he'd help remind people that chickens are not nuggets.
However, while the campaign seems light-hearted enough, PETA has continued to push the petition on social media, even going as far as tagging in Nintendo of America and series director Masahiro Sakurai.
Many replies to the latest tweet – some of which have been hidden by PETA – highlight the hypocrisy of wanting an animal in a fighting game when the organisation has previously been critical of the Pokémon series because it encourages players to pit one animal against another in combat.
https://twitter.com/melon_ish/status/1440003487128068097
Nintendo is yet to acknowledge or respond to PETA's tweets or petition.
[source dexerto.com]
Comments 103
Yeah no thanks
Please, stop publicizing anything that PETA does.
You're giving them exactly what they want.
"Not a nugget" is a very apt name.
Chicken fries, now there's a good career choice!
Animal rights are important and should be taken seriously. So please let's not promote PETA who have done far more damage than good to the cause. They raise awareness as is their goal, but they generally make a mockery of it in the process.
Removed - inappropriate
...Peta is still going huh? -.-
Look up the word hypocrite in a dictionary I'm sure you will find the word PETA.
I guess going by the logic of people accusing PETA of hypocrisy, or irony for wanting an animal in a fighting game PETA should instead advocate putting the CEO of a factory farm corporation in the game so they could get pulverized by Nintendo characters.
I'd rather see The Legend of Zelda's angry chicken mob if that's not yet in the game
This is the closest PETA will come to having a good idea.
Is "Not a Nugget" Captain Falcon and Falco's secret love child???
@janfritz
It's literally an item in the game already, it has been since Smash Bros for 3DS and Wii U.
Cuccos can spawn and if thrown at an opponent, will swarm them.
If you attack it yourself though, you'll be on the receiving end!
"After reviewing two months worth of records, Kovich found that 245 of the 290 animals–84 percent–that PETA took into custody were killed within 24 hours. Only 17 were reported as adopted or in foster homes. Kovich noted that PETA’s shelter did not meet PETA’s own published guidelines for operating a humane animal shelter."
Peta is a liyng Piece of Sheet.
Please stop giving them a Audience.
It's been proven time and again that PETA actively harm animals. Nothing they do is for animal rights. They just collect money and media coverage.
PETA exists merely for attention and clout - they are an organization that thrives off of "bad publicity is still publicity".
>Wants a character included in a game where you beat up Duck Hunt Dog on the Duck Hunt stage.
PETA: "I'm going to pretend I didn't see that."
They really put forth a lot of effort with that design and animation
PETA
Exterminates
Too many
Animals
PETA
Exacerbates
Torture of
Animals
PETA jumps on
Everything
To get
Attention
Please
Eradicate
These
Articles
Wait... so they are against using animals for entertainment, but want to put a chicken into a entertainment video game? 🤔
@Kienda Just came up with that lol?
The closest that PETA will get to a Smash rep is an anthropomorphic poo from the WarioWare series.
@Snatcher Yep.
I knew this lot were not to be trusted but a quick look on companies house just shows what a bunch of ***** they are!
Please NL don't report them anymore.
Vegan power!?!? Does PETA know that chickens aren’t Vegan? Seems like something they should know.
PETA are just so incredibly cringe aren’t they
@dew12333 "Please NL don't report them anymore."
I hope NintendoLife sees the overwhelming negative response to this PETArticle and this is the last of promotions we see for them on here.
Erm wait, PETA is hacking Smash brothers to put this character in.
Wonder if Nintendo will sue them for breaking their IP
Smash already has Piranha Plant as a fighter, I'm not sure it is possible to go much "greener" on the roster representation than that.
Don't feed PETA.
PETA is an attention whore.
@nhSnork
Hulk Smash?
I've never seen Not A Nugget on a Nintendo system or consoles in general. What's the name of the game he's starring in? Is he in Kitten Squad? I played that for a good while but never encountered him. It seems to me that he's not a videogame character and therefore not eligible for Smash.
And even if PETA is bad (don't know much about them), if you eat animals when supermarkets in our society are filled to them brim with other tasty proteins, you're at least just as bad.
@SKTTR If you do look into it, you would know they hurt all sorts of animals for said cause, so they end up doing more harm then good, if they ever did good in the first place.
Lmao I hope they don't seriously think this character stands even a shred of a chance of getting any kind of representation in Smash bros.
As Scott the woz once said “PETA loves animals so much, they would kill one to show you how much they care!”
Games like Ruff Times are far more impactful in their messaging, if anyone’s interested in playing a game that’s like if PETA has any sense of subtlety or dignity. Or even that old flash game Can Your Pet, lol.
This strict-vegetarian animal lover, does not like PETA. They do far more to turn people off.
Like Nintendo will wanna listen to you after you tried suing them and made multiple games portraying their characters as animal abusers🙄
This is just a tweet used to get PETA attention on gaming news outlets, so that they can be in the news for the next relevant shocking thing they have pulled. It's also a ploy to get young impressionable people at their doorstep.
The only responsible thing is to ignore it. They know they have no chance they will get a character in Smash. They just want the media to fall for it. Unfortunately Nintendolife fell for it.
@Clarice I see from your comment that you disagree, any particular reason for you wanting to advertise these people?
All well and good until the chicken gets defeated in a match and PETA cry cruelty to animals.
Peta is a grift when they have meat freezers in their HQ.
Free publicity from the co owner of Nintendolife writing the article.
@HarvestGoddess "The only responsible thing is to ignore it. They know they have no chance they will get a character in Smash. They just want the media to fall for it. Unfortunately Nintendolife fell for it."
Completely agree. Well said, I hope NintendoLife doesn't feel attacked by all the criticism here but yes they fell for it hook line and sinker. 🙈
I am a Vegan and I can't stand Peta.
@Clarice not only Nintendolife but the co-owner of Nintendolife wrote the article.
If you're going to write an article that gives PETA attention (which shouldn't be done at all, they aren't worth the time of day), you could at least point out all the horrid, downright evil business practices they partake in. They're hypocritical for far more than wanting to put an animal in a fighting game.
@tendonerd ok I didn't know that but thanks for the information.
Are you suggesting this piece was paid for by PETA then? Or what is the relevance of that information?
I hate PETA so much...
non-profit organization that is always looking to sue someone in order to get a profit ... yeah right.
Nintendolife want your hateclicks. Nothing more, nothing less.
Does PETA realize chickens aren't vegan?
Too bad it's well known PETA kills more animals than they actually help.
I'm not defending PETA, but look how many people here are talking/thinking about animal rights that wouldn't be otherwise if the tweet mentioned in the article didn't exist.
Wow. And here I used to respect PETA.
PETA is a joke that hurts their own "cause" way more than helping it.
All political views aside, this doesn't go into Smash because it's 100% LAME. Not because PETA sucks or doesn't suck...but because this idea sucks.
Dear god, peta is just the worst
I like to say, your uncle doesn't work at Nintendo. This just proves a fan theory that PETA is a literal child
Didn't Nintendo Life once said they wouldn't publish anything more related to PETA? Really... Stop giving them attention, they are simply useless.
PETA is saying ***** for attention as they usually do
What about Falco? He's already a chicken with a gun.
Anyway, PETA wanted attention and I have given it to them. I acknowledge I'm part of the problem, though.
PETA is cool! Ok!
Shoo, go away! Go back to your kill shelters and stealing peoples pets!
It’s final smash is euthanasia, where it puts down the other player’s pet dogs and cats. Anyone who supports PETA either doesn’t know anything about the organization aside from it’s name, or they’re absolute psychopaths.
While I'm all for the ethical treatment of animals, there are much, MUCH better and less hypocritical organizations out there to put your support behind.
In addition, while I'm completely fine with people following any diet they wish as long as it's sustainable and doesn't harm their health, they're WAY too preachy about the vegan angle. No diet fits absolutely everyone, and that includes veganism.
@Clarice wow I never thought of it that way. Perhaps you're into something. Seeing how some of Nintendolifes writers have come from more activist non video game news outlets, I'd think they'd be more suitable for the task of writing paid articles for grifting organizations.
@tendonerd eh...I don't know about that. The article mentions a source for this news and I don't think there is evidence to suggest this article was paid for.
However the article itself does feel a little odd with long quotes from the subject organisation itself, unchallenged direct mission statement copy and some 'mandatory' mild critique by some twitter user at the very end.
But that's all just a feeling I get from this. It feels a bit suspect to me personally.
Whether its PETA or some cute animal crossing planters someone made, I don’t see the problems with these articles. They all point to the relevance and affect Nintendo has on our world….and our lives, our “NintendoLife”. 😂😂😂
Ok, i think need an NL break again.
It's getting more and more soap-boxy in here and now there are borderline advertisements for campaigns of what can only be described as lunatics.
@everynowandben I don't know about that. Maybe there are a couple people that actually seriously mentioned it, but most comments seem to be more about bashing PETA for their hypocrisy and questioning why NL posted this.
Is this the same PETA that decried Pokemon games as being cruel to animals? How is having a chicken pummelled to within an inch of its life by a selection of Nintendo characters not the same?!?
love seeing people rip on PETA in the comments for all the right reasons. PETA is absolutely the worst.
and they give normal vegans who aren't totally insane a bad name. trust me, guys, we're not all that horribly obnoxious. ☹️
@Darlinfan Reread these comments. Sure, people here aren't exactly discussing animal rights, but you aren't considering the fact that many people here are thinking about animal rights when they would not have otherwise. Small and/or fleeting thoughts have a bigger influence than you might expect. Let's look at hypothetical opposite extremes. Extreme one: literally no one ever talks about or thinks about X even for a moment. Will anyone care about X? Essentially impossible. Other extreme: all ideas thought, sentences spoken, and words written are about X. Will anyone care about X? Definitely, there's no other choice. Put these extremes on opposite ends if a sliding scale, and you can see that talking about and/or thinking about X in some capacity has a proportional effect on if people care about X or not. PETA thinks ends justify means. Their underlying message (animals should be treated with respect) is being considered (albeit at a fairly shallow, maybe even subconscious level) by people here who would not think about animal rights at all otherwise. Personally, I don't think ends justify means, but we can't say that PETA didn't ultimately get us thinking and talking about animal rights today, even if yes, it's at a very shallow level.
It makes you wonder what kind of people they're hiring at PETA.
Kazooie is offended.
How about, "Get out. Now. You delusional, terroristic, self righteous D-bags."
I think Betty White is in PETA...
Thank you, once again, NintendoLife, for giving PETA the attention they so desperately crave smh...
PETA could always fund a kickstarter project through their members?
@Darlinfan There are many, many steps between total lack of awareness and "mission accomplished." There's also a huge difference between education reform and treating animals with respect - it's not really apples to apples. The slaughter of animals for food would stop almost overnight if everyone on Earth decided to be vegan all at once, which would solve by far the biggest contributing factor to animal disrespect. The concept is simple for people to understand: the more meat eaten, the more animals have to be killed. Educational reform is a lot more complex of an issue with many, many competing ideas for what should happen when, how, where, and to/with who. Another difference is that many people would like to see educational reform in some form or another, while most people do not want to hear the message that eating meat contributes to animal disrespect. People say "I love animals, but I also love eating meat." Those people don't want to hear or acknowledge their contradiction. Which is why PETA (misguidedly) feels compelled to resort to shock value, scare tactics, etc. Their plan is to get their message out at any cost, which of course often leads to hypocrisy and making moves that ultimately undermine the message they're trying to deliver. Conversely, the ranter simply wouldn't hurl feces in the first place because he wouldn't feel like he must do so in order for his message to be heard. People will probably listen to him anyway. An additional flaw with that comparison is that the passerby doesn't know who the ranter is in advance or what he stands for by association. This is the part I feel like you may be dismissing: It's not just that people think PETA sucks, it's that people know what PETA is and what they are trying to tell you (even though of course HOW they communicate that message is often beyond awful). Every time someone hears "PETA" they also hear "animal cruelty is bad" purely by association even if it's subconsciously. Now, they might also hear "those people are awful" and "hypocrites" but that doesn't matter to PETA (because they're awful). The more people have the idea "animal cruelty is bad" go through their minds, the more likely they are to actually consider that thought. The same can't be said about the the guy hurling feces - his identity and his message are not hand in hand. People don't associate the ranter with the message. When covered in the stinky brown stuff, most people aren't going to think "we should reform education."
Hearing Not A Nugget and I think of the Nuggetaboutit guy in Pokemon Gen 5.
@Darlinfan the fact everyone dislikes peta doesn't mean anything. They have and continue to do lots of good.
As for overthinking WHY people dislike peta, that's actually pretty interesting for many reasons. There's a front group called "center for consumer freedom" that spends alot of time and money bashing peta, it goes pretty deep. Peta really isn't shady or bad.
I worked in dog sled racing. It's awful what goes on, peta has almost killed the Iditarod. Animal racing really is very messed up and should be illegal.
I have worked at a zoo, on farms, dog racing, training kennels, and an exotic animal rescue. I just know alot about animals. I used to dislike peta like most people. But time and experience have made me see where they are coming from, and all the good they do. How serious these issues truly are. Dog sled racing is hell and peta's work on the Iditarod is very accurate.
@Darlinfan I'm literally not having a one man conversation as you're responding to me but sure we can end it there since nuance doesnt seem like your thing. Maybe you're having a bad day or something? If so, I hope things get better.
@Darlinfan At first it appeared to me that you didn't understand what I was getting at, and unfortunately it looks like you still don't (probably my fault for not explaining it well enough), but I'm going to walk away from this now since you seem to be more interested in arguing with people than having an actual discussion. Hope that your day gets better.
Keep your filthy vegan fingers out of gaming, PETA...
@Darlinfan What you don't seem to realize is that it's all in the mind, maaaaaan. Simple observation and facts? Pssh, miss me with that. It's all about conjecture, projection, and speculation nowadays, darling, get with the times!
Anyway, briefly getting back on subject, a chicken with a gun sounds fun. Just a shame it's an idea presented from this organization
Oh, and just in case you don't agree with what I'm saying, I hope you have a nice day dude 😉
@Darlinfan Dude, let it go. I'm not interested in continuing this conversation with you.
@Darlinfan Kinda creeping me out now how obsessive you're getting. Please just drop it and move on.
PETA: MAKING ANIMALS FIGHT EACHOTHER IS ABUSE!
Also PETA: please add this chicken to your fighting game <3
@RupeeClock If you go back years ago, you will find Nintendolife articles on Peta with the top comment being exactly the same. Doesn't matter if the comments have hundreds of likes. Peta articles will continue on this site until the site is dissolved.
Come on PETA what did Sakurai do to you? he is already over worked to death without your idiot followers pestering him!
PETA understands what belongs in Smash as well as anyone expecting Goku.
PETA, back at it again with the high-octane cringe.
Also I know it's a stupid post by people who don't understand the game anyway but restoring ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of your metre, my word.
@Clarice The thing is, media is a dirty business. It's not always about facts and ethics. If an article about PETA and Smash will get a bunch of ad revenue, sometimes that's all it takes for a publisher to run it. They'll keep the machine going until stories about it aren't profitable. The only thing to do is to not click on the article, but that might be too hard for some people. I know I screwed up on that one. ;P
PETA are annoying as they do some good things. But overall they’re a flop. They need to update themselves.
But what. Vegan pummel power? Hah come on now. I know vegan body builders exist but vegans by large are lacking nutrients. They have to rely on nasty chemically produced vitamin tablets to live.
It’s just uncool is veganism. I ***** love eating meat. Hasn’t done my oldest living relatives any harm either.
Eat meat, kids. Eat bacon, chicken, steak, eggs (apparently in America eggs are terrible. They don’t vaccinate hens so eggs can have salmonella on them. If you put them in the fridge, as yanks do for some reason, it sends the bacteria inside the shell. Plus they’re all a sickly pure white colour. European chickens, and our food standards, are much better than what America has).
@Clarice I doubt it. As far as how advertising fees work, any interaction is still engagement. Not commenting would be better for fighting these articles, not reading them would be even better.
On top of all that, they hurt/kill more animals than most of people they're supposedly "saving" them from.
The entire organization needs to be razed from the planet.
@damien33ad Sentient beings deserve to be treated with respect.
@damien33ad I'd say it depends on what you mean by "unborn babies." I'd say a fetus should probably be considered a sentient being, but probably not an embryo or zygote.
The ideals behind PETA are not bad, I think your description really highlighted that, the methods through which they try to achieve these things can range from kinda funny, to hypocrisy, to annoying or bad. They give vegans a bad rep because of the stupid things they do, and end up alienating people who could've eventually decided to go vegan
@Mynameishello Oh yeah grade A eggs make me sick, the shells are so thin and they taste horrible, I also do believe in animal rights so I tend to buy pasture-raised eggs, it's difficult because companies will plaster boxes with things like "cage-free" which sounds good until you read the fine print on what that actually means
@Darlinfan @Darlinfan Im more saying that's why people have a distaste for peta. It has alot to do propaganda by that group CFC.
It's in vogue to hate on peta. Even the news does it. Lots of YouTubers do it for attention. But the general public knows little about animals. We live in an attention based economy, it explains pets actions, the cfcs, people who hate on peta. All of it.
Like, I know from first hand experience dogsled racing is rotten to the core and it should be illegal. If people knew what I knew and have seen what I've seen it would be gone. But it's not that easy. Even though I'm extremely qualified to say this.
Peta has this thing against NIH monkey experiments at the moment. The person who went to them was literally the person I charge of the monkeys. Not some random labtech. Not some peta member. It was the literally person who's job it was to oversee the entire thing. But even a person in her position wasn't able to change anything on her own. She had to go to peta.
People think peta fakes videos and info. They have no need to. People go to them all the time. for example the Texas a and m dog experiments it was a whistleblower who was one of the labtechs. Even police have gone to peta over bad shelter conditions and stuff. Even i thought about going to peta during my time in sled dogs.
But yeah. Everyone hates on everything they do. I know YouTubers who have basically made their careers off bashing peta without actually understanding the issues peta is even talking about. (Like the illuminaughtii, in one of her videos she tells her audience she doesn't think the Iditarod is bad, acts like chick culling isn't real, etc, etc. Basically just acting like peta fabricates everything without doing any research herself)
I'm not vegan. But I'm still am animal activist. Animal racing needs to be banned. Its uglier than you can even imagine. Greyhound racing is banned across most of the us already. My time on racing showed me breeding and training animals to race is basically the same as training them to fight. Fighting and racing are extremely similar in how they work. The training and economy is basically the same. My racing knowledge transfers over.im not joking when I say that Michael Vick would pick dog sled racing up no problem.
If peta comes up in conversation in your life, Ive tried to tell you and give you examples of how peta works and why they are important. They spay and neuter, they have helped get tethering banned on multiple places, they help shelters, they offer end of life services to anyone, they offer counseling to help you be a better per owner, they give people food and toys for their pets, they get dogs off chains. And I my case, I can see they are a important outlet for whistle blowers who see extremely horrible normalized things and wish to help make a change. (Seriously, their sleddog videos are fantastic and super accurate, and they have done loads of damage to the Iditarod by going after it's sponsors)
I'm suddenly craving McDonald's 10 piece McNuggets.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...