The Witcher 3 arrives on a Nintendo Switch near you tomorrow and, as you may already know if you've checked out our review, anyone who has yet to sample the delights of The Continent is in for a treat. The Switch version might not hold up to direct comparison with other versions on more powerful, non-portable consoles, but considering when taken on its own merits, it's another brilliant 'impossible' port to add to Switch's growing collection.
Of course, if you've got even the slightest interest in the changes between the existing versions and this new Switch port, you'll want to check out the above video courtesy of our friends over at Digital Foundry. Thomas Morgan has put 'Switcher 3' up against the PS4 version and given us all a good idea of just how much of the experience has made the jump to Nintendo's portable hybrid.
In general, docked mode aims for a dynamic 1280x720 resolution with the lowest recorded figure Thomas measured coming in at 960x540. In Handheld mode, that figure is the maximum, with a low of 810x546. It's safe to say that static screenshots aren't too flattering on old Geralt on Switch, although in motion the visuals hold up much better. Make no mistake - if you've got a PS4 sitting under your telly and you're not interested in playing Witcher 3 on the bus, the Switch version makes some dramatic cutbacks across the board. If you're a Switch-only gamer, however, you're still getting a fine interpretation of a brilliant game.
NPC counts are more or less the same as on more powerful hardware, although their framerate is halved in the distance. Thomas is also enthusiastic about the water effects retained in the Switch port, with screen space reflections and ripple physics just like the other versions.
On the negative side, cutscenes feature plenty of pop-in and textures and audio suffer from compression in order to squeeze the game onto a 32GB cart. The framerate is another area where compromises are evident. 30fps is the target, but in busy areas it can drop into the low 20s.
Overall, though, Thomas seems impressed by the work Saber Interactive has done on CD Projekt Red's original and recommends that Handheld mode is arguably the best way to play, with the system's smaller screen (even smaller on Switch Lite) helping to hide resolution changes and framerate hiccups.
Will you be tucking into The Witcher 3 on Switch? Have you played it elsewhere before? Let us know your opinion on the Switch port with a little comment below, and check out our Switcher review for the Nintendo Life verdict (spoilers: we like it quite a lot).
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 51
First ! My life has meaning !
Can’t wait to get this tomorrow
Fair enough. I have Witcher 3 on PS4, haven't gotten around to it as I'm currently on a MHW Iceborne binge. Still need to buy links awakening and a few other switch games. A backlog is starting to form for me haha. I hope those who get this game on switch, thoroughly enjoy it 😁
Yes, yes and yes.
That's next week's Nightshift breaks sorted then!
I wonder if DF checked it with or without the day one update because it is a wuite big one 3GB!) so the difference should be big in terms of performance as it has 0 content in it so only bug fixes and performance upgrade
It's shameful how Nintendo approved a game where the main character has facial hair and is not Italian. And it's also quite shameful that this site is promoting it and giving it an almost perfect score. I know my opinions aren't welcome here, so I'm leaving this site (for 10 minutes 'til I can complain about it again)
@Tantani My guess is it has the uncompressed version of the audio honestly, that would explain the huge size, and make for a nice improvement in quality. Guess I'll find out once I get to play.
It's a marvellous thing, but this is clearly a game to play in handheld mode. For the TV, get another version.
Xenoblade 2 - docked
The Witcher 3 - undocked
Dragon Quest 11 - however
@Tantani
You gotta be kidding me! I wasn't expecting a big update at all but 3 GB? That's quite a bummer to be honest
I wish (I think?) I had the ability to notice these FPS drops the way the majority here seems to be able to. Obviously if it looks like a Dreamcast game I'll be able to tell the difference, but I honestly don't think I see the difference between 30fps and the 20s. You guys have some fantastic eyesight because it still looks nice to me from the screenshots and video footage I've seen.
@Toy_Link What in the actual hell are you talking about? Can a video game character not have facial hair, and not be Italian? By the way, Geralt doesn’t need facial hair. You can get haircuts and whatnot, so what does your comment have to do with anything? “Shameful” is a pretty strong word, too.
I got my copy on Friday (somehow) and have been nothing but impressed by it so far. I'll be playing in a combo of portable and docked for sure, but I got it because the long dark Canadian winter is almost upon us and It is going to be my curl up on the couch game. While I also watch hockey.
I’m sat on the fence whether to triple dip on this (got on PS4 and PC versions), but really like the idea of portable play and supporting the developer. If it was possible to transfer characters across I think that would clinch it, but I only recently completed the main game, so would want it for the DLC episodes.
So it seems like Switcher 3 runs at a similar if not higher resolution and frame rate compared to Doom 2016 all while being a massive open world RPG rather than a linear corridor shooter.
Impressive.
@bozz - I must have similar eyes to you, cos I've never been troubled by FPS much either.
Saint's Row 3 was branded 'unplayable' by some, but other than very, very occasional slowdown it looked and ran perfectly fine to me!
Even blatant slowdown like LA Noire suffered (or the notorious area in Breath of the Wild) didn't worry me that much, I just accepted games run slowly sometimes. Always have and probably always will have sticky patches.
@Toy_Link Reported for too much relevant humor in a single, intelligent post.
Going to throw this out there. People are branding the switch a port machine. I honestly don't have an issue with ports and quite enjoy playing some games I never got round to or just enjoyed so much first time. So with this in mind what ports would you guys like to see on the switch. My top 5 in no real order.
1) Handsome Jack collection
2) Bioshock collection
3) Batman Arkham asylum or City
4) Burnout Paradise
5) Fable collection (come on Microsoft you know it makes sense)
@westman98 What's really impressive here is that, unlike Panic Button with DOOM 2016, Saber Interactive couldn't just cut the framerate in half to give themselves the overhead to make the port work. They've painstakingly optimized the game's visual performance in a variety of ways to get it to the point where it runs smoothly enough, but without making it look like complete garbage in the process, all while maintaining the same geometry, content, and target framerate as the PS4 version. The UI was also apparently re-designed to work well on the smaller screen of the Switch. A TON of effort was put into this port.
Meanwhile, DOOM 2016, which is a less demanding game in general, can't even manage to hold a solid framerate despite targeting 30fps instead of 60fps, and sees similar, if not more extreme, reductions to the image quality.
Which isn't to say the DOOM 2016 port is bad (it clearly isn't, and it's still impressive), but the level of optimization and technical wizardry that must have gone into this port is on another level.
@Beermonkey I would kill to have the fable
Games on switch! Never played Bioshock, was busy with small kids then and thought sitting them in front of these would probs make me a bit of a bad mum 🤣 but would love to get them now.
@Tantani it wouldn't make much difference, the areas of the game where it struggles are exactly where you would expect it to happen.
They have clearly squeezed the maximum performance out of the Switch and as expected in handheld this will be a good way to play it. On the TV if you have another option, that clearly is the way to go but this is the most impressive port I've seen and perhaps will see
@CairiB Fable 2 for me is still one of my favourite games I put hours into. Bioshock is another one I enjoy way too much. Have it on Xbox 360, Xbox one, PS3 and steam. Sadly I would love it on the switch. Think games like dead space and mass effect would be amazing as well but EA are useless. Would love red dead redemption rumours that have been floating around to be true. Don't get me wrong, bring on the new IP but good ports of classics would make a killing with people who never got chance to play them or people like me who are just completests (or plain stupid I'm not sure...)
@the_beaver Dragon Quest environmets look better in handheld. The on screen character in docked mode (including your main dude) look better. Very very pretty game all around. Might tlbe hard to dive into Switcher 3 visuals after DQ11. Just wish the Switch had enough juice in it to get things like this closer to 720 n 900p. A little more power.
@Northwind I'll admit that it went over my head. I was having a bad day at work, read the comment, and got even more irritated. That's my bad. Feel free to throw hate my way
I think people who are thinking of buying it can be divided into some main groups: 1) the ones who can't play any other versions of the game 2) the ones who can play it somewhere else but want it handheld 3) the ones who want to support the devs for their work.
In any of the cases, I don't think those 3 groups can go wrong with the port. If you don't want to support the devs or to play it handheld or can play it on ps4, xbox or PC, just go for it. There's something for everyone.
yay the PS4 vs Switch comparison of the Digital "PS4 Lovers" Foundary is back.
Don't these guys know that the Switch is a small portable system running a mobile SoC that's now more than 3 years old?
I also have the game (got it early in the mail), and true it doesn't look as good as PS4 / PC / XBOX ONE. But it looks really good for a Switch game. Sure the game is not always really smooth, but it plays really good. And is a lot of fun.
The Witcher 3 world at 960x540... is basically a NO for me.
If you do not Play Witcher 2 there are things you simply will not get in W3 (no need for W1). So, If you find you enjoy these types of games - time to stop being a "Switch-only gamer"
But if only option - still play it. Witcher 3 is a great game, you will not regret it
810x546? You sure? 🤔
@Tisteg80 You probably can also play fine without the update?
Wait wait wait.
I've just asked on ign.it website about the loading times. The reviewer told me that they are 40% faster than ps4 (and it's a news that I've seen on nintendolife as well).
This video is telling me on this very moment that the loading times are 25% slower compared to the ps4.
Can I please understand?
Fast loadings times are vital to me.
Who the hell is not doing their job properly here? Please guys help.
@Agramonte coming from an era of sub 20fps @240i I can play and enjoy 960x540 @25-30fps games thank you very much.
An incredible achievement. A feather in the cap of the Switch and those involved in
Making it happen.
@sanderev
I’m not convinced you’ve ever watched a Digital Foundry video
@graysoncharles
Bro I clearly remember some nintendolife previews claiming that.
In case I'm mistaking there's a gamerant article, and on top of that a personal reply from the reviewer of ign.it (Italian version of ign).
She specifically told me in the forum that the loadings are 40% faster. I'm going to ask her again and investigate cause it's a bit confusing.
I'll let you guys know if she replies.
(Can give you all the links, I'm not trying to feed fake news, I'm genuinely puzzled)
@Beermonkey I'd be all over Burnout.
I'll probably pick this up eventually but I'm not that excited. It'll probably sit in the backlog for a while before I get to it.
@Beermonkey I would love to see a Batman Collection or Borderlands come to Switch.
I played about 4 or so hours of Witcher 3 on PS4. I love it so far. I am on the road a lot, so I might get this. Wish this had a cross save.
I think if you have a PS4 or One and Switch, the only reason would be to be able to play this on the go. If you only have Switch and don't game on other consoles (and PC) then it is still a purchase.
@r1chard I read somewhere (sorry, can't recall where) that they actually have a "go straight to DLC" option on the Switch version for those who had already played the main game but not the DLC, so there's that
I wonder if the mclassic will help the witcher look less blurry on tv
Texture quality seems to be the biggest downgrade. PC low setting at 720p looks better not because image quality, but because it keeps the textures sharper/more detailed.
@Moonlessky
Will see later today, I got the mCable gaming hooked to my Switch. But more or less every 4k TV got upscaling built in to the image processor, so not so sure it will be much of a difference...mCable, I think, shines more for getting free decent AA, wich Switch often lacks and jaggies are very ugly on 55-65 inches. I think texture resolution is the biggest bandit to the blurry look, 720p doesn't make games look that much like an soft oil painting as in this case. As this title maxes out at 720p, it should be the best to set the Switch output to 720p so it doesn't get the multiple upscaling artefacts. Better upscaling it once through the cable to "4k" than upscaling it first to 1080p through the Switch and than upscaling it again through cable or TV.
@Sunanootoko
Loading times seems to be around 60-90 seconds.
13p resolution here we come!
@beazlen1 coming from an era where I can play it at 2560x1600 @60fps at home and just play one of the many games the Switch can actually run well on the bus.... No thank you very much.
@Agramonte fair enough. I hope those that only own a Switch aren’t put off from buying this gem because of the constant put down in comparison to other versions. I’ve had my copy since Saturday and it’s a joy to play. Even in docked - which has been slated for the low res and muddy textures magnified on the big screen -it’s still perfectly playable and pretty awesome.
@Agramonte kotaku did a pretty decent catch up for those new to the series and things you might want to consider when selecting choices you made for witcher 2. I played on base ps4 without playin 1 or 2 and I enjoyed it. Though I thought Toussaint challenged it big time technically. Still to go to the continent while on the bus or while the missus watches the tv is surely a technical marvel?
Awesome game no matter what platform it's on. Check out <a href=https://theanxiousgamer.blog/2019/10/14/witcher-3-is-a-must-try-for-every-switch-user/">this</a> review of it on switch.
@sanderev
“... true it doesn't look as good as PS4 / PC / XBOX ONE. But it looks really good for a Switch game. Sure the game is not always really smooth, but it plays really good.“
Um, in a nutshell, this is what Digital Foundry said.
@R1spam I could just play Bayo 1 on PC and read about Bayo 2 on Kotaku. But still rather just buy a Switch and play both.
Just like I rather not just play the 1 game in the Witcher trilogy - because that is the game that makes it to Switch 5 years later. Or be satisfied with that if a better version available to me.
I SteamLink/RemotePlay my PC/PS4 games to my iPhone or iPad when the family room TV is busy. Or just play something else on Switch. I do not play 1 game at a time at home or on the GO.
It would be AMAZING! if Witcher 3 had CrossSave with PC like Original Sin 2. Best of both worlds for those of us that do not want to give up what we already have at home.
@beazlen1 Oh, 100% with you there. Playing it in any shape, way or form it is available (Just like DQ11) is better than not at all. I edited my post make sure that is clear.
Yeah, and you have the expansions included - so LOTS of game in there for you to enjoy. All this talk makes me feel like re-installing it just to run around a bit.
@Agramonte agree that cross-save would be ideal! Have to say there is a shed load of ps3 owners last gen who wouldn't have played 2 with it being xbox360/pc only who would be in the same boat. Your remote play set up is great, my iPad is too old to support and waiting to test out the new android version from recent update. It's the only way I'm going to get through persona 5!
Some serious cutbacks, but still looks decent.
I have it on pc, but this'll probably be the skyrim situation again, where being able to curl up on the bed to play it and no mods to distract me let me actually play the game all the way through.
Cya
Raziel-chan
@R1spam yeah - only reason I finished it was because of remote play
Persona 5 would be great on Switch. It is the same as DQ11. Where the difference between PS4 and Switch really do not matter
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...