Despite mostly skipping the Wii and Wii U, Bethesda has been one of the most supportive third-party developers on Switch. With games like Skyrim, DOOM, Wolfenstein II all on the system, the company's relationship with Nintendo has never been better.
As you might expect, the partnership appears to be benefitting both sides. Bethesda is seeing the audiences for its top games growing as Nintendo-exclusive players check them out for the first time, and speaking to GamesIndustry.biz, the studio's SVP of global marketing Pete Hines has said that it's "clear" these games are bringing new players to Nintendo's machine.
"One of the things we discovered in talking with Nintendo, is that there's a segment of their audience who plays other kinds of things on their platform that also likes our stuff. And there's a segment of their audience -- and it's a healthy size -- whose entry point into the platform is our title. [Nintendo] can see what is the first thing people play on a new Switch account, and when it's a Doom or a Skyrim, they're like: 'Somebody got a Switch and decided to play your game before anything else.'
"It's interesting to see. It definitely fits an audience that [Nintendo] already has, but it's also clear that we are bringing some new people to [Switch]."
Of course, Bethesda's support is continuing with DOOM Eternal arriving this November and Wolfenstein: Youngblood launching later this month. It's great to see these franchises finding a new home on Switch and we sure hope it continues.
Have you enjoyed any of these games on Switch? Let us know in the comments below.
[source gamesindustry.biz, via videogameschronicle.com]
Comments 116
I haven't picked them up, but I'm glad I have the option to.
I fear there is a danger of a little bit of a flood though. I'm still loving Doom on the Switch... so much so I'm not yet ready to get Doom Eternal or Wolfenstien. I can't imagine I'm the only one.
So no Doom, no Switch buy ? BS !
Bethesda's support has been amazing, actually bringing all the new DOOM and Wolfenstein titles over, and giving them (so far) good ports. Even Skyrim had a good port, although it's definitely worth calling out that it's overpriced.
Yup it's all because of them the switch is a success, nothing to do with BotW or Smash or Mario Maker.
No its all because of DOOM
@Bunkerneath Read the article, mate. They're playing the Bethesda games before anything else on the Switch. Which means they bought the Switch primarily to play DOOM on the go, and then buy Breath of the Wild later on.
Let them have their moment. It’s backed up by data, and I thinknit’s a great sign. I love Nintendo, but I definitely missed the AAA “mature” titles during Wii and Wii U. I love that Bethesda is a strong supporter!
This is one of those things where it definitely doesn’t hurt to have their support. When I saw Skyrim in the initial Switch reveal trailer, I knew that Nintendo was taking steps in the right direction. Then it lead to Doom and Wolfenstien, which I never would have believed at the time. All things considered, Bethesda made a good call to jump on board early with Switch.
@Bunkerneath Skyrim, Doom etc. as portable games.
I can see some truth to that, Skyrim is currently my "most hours played" Switch game. Now if they could only give us proper, modern Fallout game. Prey and Dishonored would also be nice.
It's legit, the first games I bought for my Switch were DOOM followed by Sonic Mania Plus. Weirdly I now own 8 physical games for my Switch and 5 digital ones and not a single game is a 1st party Nintendo title. o_O
For physical games I've got:
And digitally I have Darkwood, Dust: An Elysian Tail, Fe, Night in the Woods, and Resident Evil: Revelations 2.
@premko1
They're not saying that people are only buying Switches due to Bethesda games being available, but that some people are buying Switches particularly to play Bethesda games.
Nintendo has a History with Games such as Doom going all the way back with the Snes,GBA and N64. Its no big secret that real fans of the Nintendo platforms love playing all types of 3rd party games. It wasnt until the Wii that hardware was too weak to have the same 3rd party games as other platforms. As a result we got either old ps2 ports or strange different versions of 3rd party games and that made most nintendo fans not buy them. Then devs would say oh our games didnt sell well on nintendo so we guess the audience isnt there. But the truth is we wanted the games but we wanted the same ports everyone else got. This gave a generation of kids the idea that nintendo fans didnt want 3rd party but we have always wanted 3rd party as long as its the same game everyone else gets.
The Switch is Eternally Doomed!!!
Sorry, someone had to do it. I wish it was Eternally Darknessified
@beazlen1 how long did it take your tiny brain to come up with that?
@NesGuy2017 One could say the same for a petty insult for no reason at all.
@beazlen1 I would like my Switch to be sealed in Eternal Darkness, as well.
Bethesda, I'd like something other than Fallout Shelter please. And don't try to throw Tactics at me, you know what I want.
Bethesda support has bin an mixed bag to me. As while we got games like elder scrolls skyrim ,Doom and Wolvenstein they also try to give us mobile game ports and act like it amazing. So for every good game they got an bad game as well
Ps
Pretty much everyone buys an Nintendo console/handheld for it first party line up ,and not because Bethesda in this example brings doom to the system.
How about some new games?
This nostalgia craze has gone on long enough. Skyrim is the worst of it, now they can just rerelease the same game over and over.
I know I can't wait for Youngblood and Doom Eternal on both Switch and PS4!
@citizenerased exactly why I have not bought Skyrim for a 3rd time. I would love to play it on the go but I already own it for pc and ps4. If it was $20 for a physical copy 2 years after launch I would buy it again.
@StevenG
You mean like Doom, Wolfenstein II, Doom Eternal and Youngblood?
Bethesda is probably the best third party supporting the Switch right now.
@Arnold-Kage Thats not true.. there has always been a huge percentage of Nintendo fans that want to play everything on a nintendo platform but when nintendo came out with the wii it was too weak to run the same 3rd party games that everyone else got and the ones we did mange to get on the wii was either old ps2 ports or chiby ports. just because we dont want weak 3rd party ports doesnt mean that we dont want 3rd party games we just want the same 3rd party games everyone else gets day and date. the Nes,Snes,N64 and Gamecube all had major 3rd party support and as Nintendo fans we bought Nintendo consoles to play everything not just first party. With the wii being too weak it gave people the perception that people only wanted first party and as a result 3rd party was non existant on the wii u but now that devs will be coming back to nintendo for the switch youll see that people once again buy nintendo to play more than first party.
@Alber-san Not a single original game in that last. Doom and Doom 2 are straight up reboots.
Not a single one has even gotten a real physical release. Each one has a huge download making the cart useless.
@StevenG Those are definitely original games. If you mean original IPs, that's a completely different argument. I agree with you on the terrible physical releases though.
Apart from that one guy above, nobody is buying a Switch to play that version of Doom and Wolfenstein and with all due respect the latter has sold in very small numbers. I'm glad to see some good third party support and I will be getting Doom Eternal on Switch but I would much prefer these developers to simply design games for the Switch from the ground up.
You have good taste @Jin15. As i to own all those games you mentioned besides Paw Patrol and the two Outlast games. On a side note you wanna sell that used copy of Fox N Forests for like $50?
I didn't buy the Switch for those games as I owned them prior on other systems. But, I did buy them because of the portability and the fact that I hadn't beat them. It was nice knowing they could port them over in the first place. I just wish we could get Fallout 4 or New Vegas.
@citizenerased is the skyrim port ok? gameplay I have seen looks stuttery and tbh the special edition on my ps4 pro is stuttery so i have no idea how it even runs on switch unless it's just got a smaller draw distance or something
@thefoxystoat It runs great on Switch, I've put over 1,000 hours into that version
I struggle to beleive there are a significant number of people who bought Switches to play a port of a 2011 and 2016 game, even if that 2011 game is one of the most popular games of all time.
Doom Eternal should perform well on Switch, but I doubt it's gonna shift hardware to any relevant degree. Pokemon will do the heavy-lifting this holiday.
@Vapeguy I'd argue that it can get hard to see on the Switch screen during dark parts of Skyrim, but any other issues that port has are problems inherent in Skyrim, not the porting job.
@BacklogBlues
Thanks but no thanks! lol I just got Fox n Forests used about a week ago and it set me back just over $100. Pricey game, but it is a heck of a lot of fun. =)
I'd love to play Skyrim and Doom on Switch, but at $80 each (near $100 when you add sales taxes), there's no way it's going to happen. Even when Doom gets on sale on the Switch, it is for more than its regular price everywhere else. Get it down into the $25-$30 range and I'll be happy to pay.
Also, I bought Skyrim on PC for like $15 bucks some years ago and played it on my GPD Win. So "portable" Skyrim is nothing "special" that's worth paying extra for. No way I'm going to double-dip at freaking $80.
@thefoxystoat the Switch version isn't really the special edition and has many of the extras missing plus the FOV is decreased. That being said it still looks and runs great on the Switch and you get some Zelda goodies too. Unfortunately Bethesda messed up the Pro patch and should have just turned the resolution down a bit to 1800p or 1440p to smooth out performance, they did the same with Fallout 4 giving it a Pro "enhancement" that dragged down performance
Just release Oblivion GOTY please. It's been out on XBOX 360 as well and it runs fine. I'm sure Switch won't have much trouble either 720p is fine
So I really like the Fallout series but am not as big a fan of Elder Scrolls, Doom or Wolfenstein. Funny how only one of those 4 doesn't have a real entry on Switch.
Just give us Fallout 3 and New Vegas. It wouldn't even take it that much effort on their part. Certainly less that porting more recent games. And 3 and New Vegas are way better than 4 and 76.
@carlos82 yeah im not even playing on a 4k tv so that 'upgrade' does just make the game run worse. i only got the pro for the high frame rate setting in monster hunter.
@Alucard83 The Switch has more than enough power to run any 360 game at 1080p if it were properly ported and optimized. The Switch is significantly more powerful than 360.
Good stuff. I doubt it’s a huge number that are making these games their first Switch purchase but if they’re users that otherwise wouldn’t have bought a Switch then that’s a big plus.
@citizenerased Yeah no. Gonna need to see a bit more than a quote from dude that has "heard" people "saying" this stuff.
Gonna need some cold hard numbers to back up such claims.
Like, let's start with lifetime sales figures for their titles on switch and go from there even.
@Heavyarms55 These two sentences are patently untrue. What is your barometer for "significantly" here anyways?
Go look at the Digital Foundry comparison video of Red Faction on Switch for a solid assessment.
@thefoxystoat
Your question was answered, but if I may cause I have the Switch version of Skyrim as well:
I think the port of Skyrim runs very well on Switch, actually, much better than I was expecting. The draw distance is shorter, similar to what happens in BotW, but it’s not a huge dealbreaker to me. In terms of performance, I don’t notice a whole lot of stuttering, so I think it’s minimal on Switch. I have however, had the game just quit on me a handful of times. Of my +250 hours, I’d say the game crashed on me about 4 times total. Again, not major, especially for Bethesda, but I thought I should mention it. And like Carlos said above, it isn’t really the special edition, it’s sort of meets half way. Probably just best to think of it as just a port.
The only other downside I can think of is the price, but maybe you can wait for a 50% sale or something if you really want it on Switch.
@Jin15 My kids love Paw Patrol, how's the game? DOOM was my third game on the Switch, I had a nerdgasm when it was revealed hahahaha, I love it
I love both DOOM an Wolfenstein II, awesome and super fun games. I'm eagerly waiting for Youngblood and Eternal.
I love that Bethesda is seeing enough support on Switch to want to continue to make games for it. I bought Skyrim and will be buying Youngblood as well. The more AAA 3rd-party support the better so maybe it will help other developers take notice and follow suit (I know quite a few already support).
I buy everything they do. Just bring me Rage 2!
@Edu23XWiiU The Paw Patrol game looks and sounds almost identical to the TV show, just a touch lower resolution. As far as gameplay goes it's a pretty simple by-the-numbers sort of collectathon 2.5D platformer with some mini games thrown in to break up the platforming in every level, and each of the 16 levels is a rescue mission structured like an episode of the cartoon. The whole cast of Paw Patrol pups are playable and you control two different pups in every level, so every character gets at least a couple levels. The only complaint I could really make about the game is the constant reminders it gives the player about how the controls work, which I suppose could be helpful for the preschooler demographic it's geared towards, but it would have been nice if they had included an option to turn off the control reminders in the menu.
That's a fairly minor complaint though and I'd say that as far as licensed games go this is a pretty good one. It doesn't do anything especially innovative, but it doesn't do anything really wrong either. It looks and sounds good, the control is tight, the gameplay is fun and engaging if not a bit simplistic, and there's a bunch of awards and extras to unlock by accomplishing various goals in each level so it's got some replay value as well. I don't think Paw Patrol: On a Roll! will be winning any game of the year awards, but it's still sure to please fans of the show. =)
@Jin15 "It's legit, the first games I bought for my Switch were DOOM followed by Sonic Mania Plus."
Raised my eyebrows a bit when I noticed how many people downvoted your comment when you were merely listing the games you purchased. Maybe it was because there were no pure Nintendo offerings, or maybe because your comment didn't conform to their own world view. In any case, people can be drones sometimes. Smash isn't for everyone, and that's okay.
@roadrunner343 No, they are reboots. A sequel would be a new game.
Doom 1 and 2 have been rebooted. Making a Doom that takes place after the events of hell on earth would be a sequel.
Same with the wolfenstiens, save for the one in paris.
I picked up Skyrim, but yeah Zelda was most definitely my first pick up along with Bomberman (which I've since traded in). However I've also been here since the beginning and there was no bethesday then. Even if that was the case though I find it odd with so many good nintendo titles that Doom or Skyrim would be first choices to play before so many of the great nintendo games.
@Jin15 anybody else looking at your pic and getting nostalgia for lag shooting on Modern Warfare?
Give me a fallout! I'd like 3, NV or 4. Remastered 3 or NV would be pretty great. I liked 4 a lot too.
@StevenG Nonsense. We don't live in a binary world. I think it is clear things are a bit more nuanced, and there are plenty of "new" games that aren't direct sequels. What about prequels? Parallel stories? I think anyone that spends more than 3 seconds thinking about it can tell that the Wolfenstein, Doom, Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy VII, etc... reboots are completely different games that are simply set in the same universe. Heck, you could extend your silly definition to games like Fallout 3, but I guess since it has the magical number on the end making it a sequel, it doesn't count as a reboot.
I thought Nintendo fans didn't care about third party games. Just first party games and hipster Indies.
@roadrunner343
That doesn't change the fact that they are reboots, not new games.
This is a very simple concept. Not everything is this clear cut, but this is. They are retellings of the same story.
The number isn't what makes sequels, the timeline does. Children understand this concept.
Prequels would indeed be new games. See you understand.
Fallout3 is even worse. It is Elder Scrolls: wasteland edition. It's not a real fallout game.
@Jin15 That was a really good review bro, thanks a lot! When a get another Switch by the end of the year, I'll get Paw Patrol: On a Roll! my kids!
@StevenG So if a game even uses a tiny fraction of a previous game's plot, it is immediately considered an old game? Give me a break. You're being intentionally ridiculous and childish at this point. A reboot can most definitely be a new game.
Brand new visuals, brand new plot lines, brand new audio effects, brand new musical scores, brand new game play mechanics... but you don't want to call those reboots new games? They're obviously new games, just not new IPs. But sure, call them whatever you want.
I'm just glad that Nintendo has variety, I completely understand that not everyone wants to play Mario Party.
@Reignmaker Everyone's got different tastes in games, and I just bought the kind of games that I know I enjoy playing. I think my game selections might largely be a product of my age though. I'm in my 30's now and don't seem to have the kind of patience for games that I did when I was younger, so I tend not to go for any game that's going to take more than 20 hours to beat. No matter how good a game is I just kinda lose interest after 20 hours or so and move on to something else, which is why I've passed over Nintendo's first party offerings like Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Mario Odyssey, and Smash thus far. They're just too long for my liking, which is probably a complaint that isn't often heard. lol
On the flip side, I have gone back and replayed DOOM four times over and beaten it with 100% completion on Ultra Violence twice now so there are still games that can really sink their hooks into me every now and then. =)
Awesome, now can you please make a Fallout New Vegas HD remaster or at least even just a Fallout port? Or a Fallout Classics that's FO3 and FO:NV, that would be rad. Really just either of those two because I am not buying Fallout 4 again. But I will happily buy Fallout New Vegas for the third time just like I did Skyrim. Skyrim was the third title I bought for my Switch which coincidentally was also the third time I bought Skyrim, (PS3 at launch, remaster for PC years ago, and then Switch). I bought FO:NV in 2010 for PS3 and put tons of hours into it, then bought it on PC in 2016; I would 100% buy it again for Switch, that would be so rad.
@Edu23XWiiU You're very welcome! There's not a whole lot of info out there on this game and it's a pretty good one as far as licensed games go, so I figured I'd toss in my two cents on it. I think your kids will have a lot of fun with it. =)
It just goes to show third parties can thrive on Switch if they make the effort. Gratz Bethesda!
@GrailUK dont forget panic button does most of the work ported bethesda games to the switch.
@roadrunner343 So are they reboots or not? They are remakes of an old game. It's a boring cash grab.
@StevenG doom 2016 is a reboot for sure but doesnt mean its a cash grab man.
@StevenG The terms aren't mutually exclusive. Call it what you will - a reboot, a re-imagining, it doesn't matter - they're new games, with 99% of the content being brand new. Being set in the same universe or reusing a tiny portion of a universe's backstory does not make it an old game.
So pumped for Doom Eternal Rip and Tear!🙌🏼
DOOM and Skyrim can even sell VR in its infancy, Not surprised they can move a few Switch. They great brands.
But obviously most people buying Smash, ZBOTW and MK with their new Switch.
@StevenG
Fair play. I’ve never seen Doom 2016 described as a cash grab. That is special. Exactly how would One make a Doom sequel that isn’t a cash grab in your eyes?
@electrolite77 Make it a real sequel or prequel or whatever. Don't try to retell the same story. It was a good game, but the reboot idea is really a lame cash grab.
@roadrunner343 Retelling the exact same story does.
That's it. It wouldn't be hard to have a new story in the same universe.
@RiasGremory Oh I know. Panic Button have done us proud on Switch. Hope they have much more in the pipeline.
@electrolite77 Presumably by adding a number to the end of the title.
@StevenG For the most part, they don't "Retell the exact same story"... I'm sure there are examples of that, but that is not the case with most of the reboots I mentioned. There's more new plot than reused. Share the same backstory does not mean everything else in the game is reused or old, and all of the games I mentioned have plenty of original plot lines, character stories, etc... Even so, there's more to a game than just the story.
@StevenG
It’s Doom. What story?
@NesGuy2017
You got an point, but I mean that you usually buy an console for it first party content
Never mind all that Pete hines, can you make the text bigger on Skyrim and doom when undocked. Old rogues like me can't play em unless I've remembered my glasses
I have Doom, Skyrim, and Wolfenstein on my switch and am really looking forward to Doom Eternal. Wolfenstein: Youngblood I don't know. I wish the game was on a cart.
Shut up and give us FALLOUT 😂
Have to comment on this one.
For me I brought my switch for the fact I can play Skyrim, doom, wolfenstein, saints row and assassins creed. All either portable or in table top mode. I have lived off grid without mains power for over 5 years. One of my favourite pass times was Xbox 360, and now with switch being able to run from 12v charger with minimal power usage and the fact I can play the games I mentioned above. Fantastic. Hence backinthegame. I own 1 Nintendo title I’m just struggling to play/enjoy. Mario well mario is great and I I have fond childhood memories of him. Pokemon I assume is today’s kids alternative to mario, Definitely not my thing. Each to their own.
So yes Bethesda definitely brought me back to Nintendo.
If you wanted to legitimately entice new players to play on Switch for new experiences, maybe you should tell Todd and BGS to stop putting mobile games like Blades on Switch while id and MachineGames are putting actual AAA games like DOOM and Wolfenstein
All I'm saying is just remaster Morrowind, Oblivion and Fallout 3 Bethesda Game Studios
No one wants mobile games with excessive microtransactions on a $300 console
@Heavyarms55 I could not agree more. I have been utterly disappointed by Bethesda ever since they announced Fallout 76. They give me Fallout 3 & New Vegas portable, all is forgiven.
@backinthegame I'm so confused as to why you think pokemon is similair to mario, and an alternative to mario for kids today? :s
Bethesda never supported any Nintendo console earlier with big title games, and now they are the #1 third party on a Nintendo console.
Be glad they are caring about Switch at all.
Doom 3 please!
Sorry, but Skyrim came out like 7 years ago. Nobody bought a switch to play Skyrim. Doom is also like 3 years old. Nobody bought a switch to play doom
To the Switch DOOM owners, I have a quick question. I was thinking of picking it up for the multiplayer again and was wondering if there is still an active community playing online. I love Warpath and if it still queues in a reasonable time I'm in. Do the queues take forever?
@Maulbert I mean 76 was still a huge let down. But I could ignore it if I could have those older games on Switch.
@hihelloitsme A poorly done port.
I like what they are doing but I’m sick of the constant ports we are getting for the Switch. It’s mostly games that been out of other systems with a increased retail price. I want developers to release more original games for the Switch just how Platinum Games did with Asteral Chains
I am glad that Bethesda has been supporting the Switch and perhaps other third party studios will learn how to make good ports of their AAA titles. I plan to get their games soon
@ARhollow I would like that too, more original IPs for Switch
@Michaelrojelio84
It’s really getting out of hands. I mean it’s cool for the people that never played ports on the other systems but for people like me, I have Skyrim and Doom on PC. I am not spending 60 dollar per game to play them again especially with downgraded graphics. I want to see original IPs made especially for the Switch not just Nintendo first party games.
@ARhollow. Yeah I see your point, for me it is cool because I only have the Switch right now but I'd feel the same way if I did have those games already on other systems. Original IPs are still lacking but hopefully more will come and I am looking forward to Astral Chain
@BlueBlur101 morrowind remastered on switch 😍, morrowind was so great it was my most played game on xbox. Oblivion and skyrim weren't as great.
@Doktor-Mandrake I guess for me I grew up with mario and sonic and kids today grew up with Pokemon. I remember my little sister watching it on tv and wanting a pecachu toy for her birthday when she was 10. Hope that dispels your confusion.
@ARhollow
Unless Nintendo pay for and publish it that isn’t going to happen. It doesn’t really happen anymore anywhere unless the platform holder is paying.
@jly1987
Nintendo and Bethesda - “We’ve got info that Bethesda games are the first thing people play on the Switch suggesting it drove their purchase “
Post #82 - “Yeah I did that”
You at post #87 - “Nobody does this. You’re all lying”
@nathatruc - I would definitely get Morrowind if it got released on the Switch - what a game! Although realise it's quite long odds 😊
@Jin15 You have Paw Patrol but not Smash or Mario Odyssey? Shame, you don't know what you're missing out on. 🤦♂️
@TheAwesomeBowser Scroll up to post #60 for my reason why I've past over Nintendo's first party offerings thus far. =)
While I bought my Switch to play zelda I am playing Bethesda games I would normally skip.
@backinthegame not really, because Im 28 and I grew up with pokemon lol, hardly a kid at 28 am I? Also pokemon is rpg, not platformer like mario
@Doktor-Mandrake no I guess you’re not but considerably younger than myself. I get the different game style so point taken there. I suppose the comparison for me is the whole cartoon type characters just not my thing. However it was for people like yourself of my sisters generation. And that’s where the comparison comes from I grew au with cartoon type games mario/sonic and my sisters generation had pokemon. But hay each to their own. But I can definitely say I brought my switch for 3rd party games and yes the first games I brought for switch were Bethesda titles.
@backinthegame fair enough, also pokemon has gone on for years so they'll still be kids growing up with the newer generations of pokemon, played a little bit of lets go pickachu on my switch but overall not as much into pokemon as I was as a kid, I still like to think kids grow up with Mario games though since Mario games get released quite regularly over the decades but maybe pokemon is more appealing to them
Tempted to get Doom for Switch, already got it on PC but having it portable would be neat, for me it was opposite and I bought switch for first party titles, mostly super mario oddessey
@electrolite77 Pete Hines is Bethesda’s pr guy. You can find A person who does SOMETHING. Or A person who just SAYS so because we’re on a Nintendo forum. Doom and Skyrim aren’t selling switches. They weren’t even selling consoles on systems where they run good. A bad version of the game isn’t selling a system unless the person buying it has some issues
@ARhollow you aren’t going to get that with Bethesda lol. They’re content with just bringing the worst version of their games to extract a little extra money
Then mental deficiencies one must have to spend 300 on a console specifically to pay 60 dollars for a 20 dollar game which is also the OBJECTIVELY WORST version of the game. Except Skyrim because it’s broken on PS3. But other than that you’ve got to clearly be out of your mind
Really what we’ve got here is a Nintendo community so starved for AAA title experiences that’s ARENT Nintendo, that we accept 60 dollar versions of 7 year old titles that run worse than they did 7 years ago...
@jly1987
Or you could be wrong. And it could be you with the issues. Stop digging.
“Then mental deficiencies one must have to spend 300 on a console specifically to pay 60 dollars for a 20 dollar game which is also the OBJECTIVELY WORST version of the game”
You do know the Switch is portable don’t you? Are you OK? You’re stomping around having a tantrum and accusing others of mental deficiencies when you don’t seem to have realised that for someone who wants these games on the go the Switch version is not OBJECTIVELY the WORST at all.
Portability doesn’t make it a better port. They run at lower resolutions and frame rates. That is objectively worse. They run worse. That is objective, not subjective
@nathatruc Oblivion was great in terms of world traversal but its story lacked a bit compared to morrowind, but the music was arguably better.
Skyrim is a masterpiece in open world game design imo, no matter how much Bethesda milked out of its success
It also has one of my favorite OSTs in gaming history, as well as one of my favorite opening tracks in any rpg
@BlueBlur101 skyrim is great but I find morrowind better for the story and the world was more varied, lots of differents cities with their own architectures. I found skyrim was not varied enough but it's still an amazing game and I really like to play it on the go.
DOOM was the first game I bought on Switch, downloaded it as soon as I got setup. I also have Wolf 2 and I’m really looking forward to DOOM Eternal. The only first party title I have is MK8, which I got on sale as I already played it to death on Wii U. So believe it or not my Switch is a 3rd Party / Indie machine!
@Jin15 I beat Odyssey in around 15 hours or so. BTW, have you heard the saying, "Good things come to those who are patient"? It can really help, especially for those extra-long titles.
I'm the one, because I've decided to buy switch when I saw it has Doom and Wolfenstein. Breath of the Wild is the only Nintendo game I have in my library of 50+ games and not because I'm a Zelda fan but because I like open world games.
I bought Doom on Switch but continued to play it on Steam for some time, because Doom on switch runs 30fps and on my laptop it runs 60fps with better graphics. Haven't gone too far though because my xbox elite controller died and I'm waiting for the new one to come out this November. Meanwhile playing lot's of indie stuff on my Switch.
@Doktor-Mandrake I think you have done a better job of explaining what I was trying to get at.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...