![maxresdefault.jpg](https://images.nintendolife.com/c62b244c736d6/maxresdefault.900x.jpg)
Famed games player Billy Mitchell has lost his legal battle against his depiction in the Cartoon Network's The Regular Show.
The character - known as GBF (Garrett Bobby Ferguson or Giant Bearded Face) - is a floating head with arms who is revealed to be an alien who cheats at video games. The character was introduced following Mitchell's rise to mainstream fame after his appearance in the documentary King of Kong, where he is shown battling fellow high-score chaser Steve Wiebe for the world record on Donkey Kong. In the film, Mitchell is portrayed in a rather negative light, hence the parody on The Regular Show.
Since King of Kong, the Donkey Kong high score has changed hands several times, with both Wiebe and Mitchell claiming it at points. Robbie Lakeman set a new world record in 2014.
Mitchell - who also owns a chain of restaurants and produces his own cooking sauce under the family brand Rickey's World Famous Sauces - launched a lawsuit against Cartoon Network for damages, but his objections have been thrown out by New Jersey Federal District Judge Anne Thompson, who stated:
The television character does not match the plaintiff in appearance. GBF appears as a non-human creature, a giant floating head with no body from outer space, while Plaintiff is a human being. And when GBF loses his title, the character literally explodes, unlike Plaintiff.
![maxresdefault (1).jpg](https://images.nintendolife.com/9f102c41e0ceb/maxresdefault-1.900x.jpg)
Mitchell's career in video games began back in "golden age" of the arcade industry, and he has held world high scores on Pac-Man, Ms. Pac-Man, BurgerTime, Donkey Kong Jr. and Centipede. He was proclaimed the "Video Game Player of the Century" at the 1999 Tokyo Game Show, and was given an award by Namco founder Masaya Nakamura in recognition of achieving the first "perfect game" on Pac-Man that same year.
GBF isn't the first parody of Mitchell we've seen - in the recent Hollywood movie Pixels, Peter Dinklage's character Eddie sports the same facial hair and mullet as the video game veteran and hot sauce salesman.
[source eurogamer.net, via bigstory.ap.org]
Comments 69
Seems a bit mean regardless
Wasn't that a really early episode anyway?
...and why is Regular Show still even a thing, anyway?
The more important question: Is the sauce really world famous? First I've heard of it.
where can I see this? name the episode please?
Ha! They do look very similar.
I've seen that episode before but I didn't know there was a legal battle surrounding the character.
Seems to me like the guy should have won though. The aegumwnts stated in favor of Regular Show are weak. Yeah we can clearly see he is a different "species" but there's no denying that the face and hair look almost exactly like him!
I find it hilarious that they specify that the plaintiff is a human being who does not literally explode when he loses a match, as reasons why the character isn't representing him.
...But...that episode came out a while ago...why did he wait until now to file a lawsuit?
It is funny how you mention Pixels and show him from an interview from an event for that movie. Pixels also made fun of him in a mean way.
Should just cut his hair and shave his beard if he doesn't want people to make the comparison.
@riChchestM "bit mean"
Oh, suck it up. It's called parody. No one has the right to not be parodied.
Billy Mitchell is a notorious person who has absolutely all the difficulty in the world getting over himself, as it is. That kind of cartoonish personality is ripe for parody, which isn't friggin "mean" (seriously, are you an 8 year old or something?), it's exactly what it says it is... harmless parody. Protected under US law.
Mitchell must not have been selling enough hot sauce these days and just wanted to go after a parody for a cheap buck because A. he is still as much of a clueless, self-righteous man without a single funny bone in his entire body as always and B. needs a few dollars, it would seem, without doing anything.
I guess he ran out of arcade scores to forge with mysterious, doctored VHS tapes for 15 seconds of fame, and now feels the need to start frivolous lawsuits because a cartoon made fun of him. Oh boo hoo.
This isn't NEARLY the first time that a cartoon has parodied a real person or celebrity, and it sure won't be the last. A real man would have a thick enough skin to realize he's already perceived as a walking cartoon villain to begin with, and laugh it off. But Mitchell is, true to form, too stuck up to realize he's not special enough to NOT be made fun of.
Do not waste your time sticking up for this doofus. He needs to get over himself, get off his high horse and adopt a sense of humor. What a stuffed shirt, pretentious, insecure little man. Honestly, he was probably barely even worth the attention, as King Of Kong itself was probably the most deserved exposure he was ever going to get.
I was at a Q&A session at an arcade convention a few months ago and Billy Mitchell was one of the Guests of Honor. When asked about Pixels, he said that they didn't offer him enough money, so he didn't bother taking the part.
Apparently the director (or whoever was in charge) decided to change the Billy Mitchell character into an awful parody to "stick it to him" in a way. Pretty fascinating stuff.
@BaffleBlend The character has been in multiple episodes, and Regular Show is "still a thing" because people enjoy it.
This whole thing is weird.
@BaffleBlend Because Regular Show is an amazing cartoon—better than most of today's cartoons.
Go ahead, stroke the beard of Garrett Bobby Ferguson!
While he at it, he might as well sue Pixel.
Seriously though, there been a lot of things "coping" the same thing. Yo-Kai Watch being like Pokemon
what does it have to do with RS and this guy? you could say they are not parody's per say. but the point is, it really worth to sue NOW? (heck this episode aired like, 5 years ago)
Not necessarily feeling that he should've won, but those reasons stated for why he didn't are rather bizarre and weak.
At least the show isn't quite as disgusting as Adventure Time...
How bloody miserable do you have to be to sue a children's cartoon over a parody? So glad he lost.
@riChchestM You should watch his documentary, guys not exactly the nicesct guy in the world himself, plus he totally cheats.
Hah, interesting! I didn't know GBF was based on a real guy!
Yeah, you'd have to be blind not to see the resemblance.
He should have won the case.
You know who else lost a court battle? MY MOM!!
@MagicEmperor I was waiting for someone to do a Muscle Man my mom joke.
King of Kong:Fistful of Quarters was probably the greatest achievement ever in bringing gaming to a movie experience. We need more like it (and fewer like Pixels).
Billy is known for carrying Drama around him like a bag of Christmas Toys. It's a well crafted persona. I've been involved in the classic arcade collectors circle here in FL for decades, before they were even called classics.I've spoken to Billy several times over the years, and can even say I've even wiped out his high score on an Arcade Game. (Lunar Lander) He built the "Vader" persona for TV, it's not his real personality, but it is who he is in public.
I think the lawsuit was never expected to be won. It was more of a "Hello, I'm still here and relevant." Famous (as well as semi-famous) people do that in order to keep companies from profiting off of their persona, which I can understand. It's business, and their persona is their money train. Most of Hollywood does this crap. And even though it was an old episode of TRS, I'd say it took this long to get the paperwork before a judge. I had a lawsuit go on for 3 years before a Judge actually sat down and looked at the case.
Beyond that, this weekend I got to meet somebody that I hadn't met before...Walter Day. (Founder of Twin Galaxies Arcade) Walter has more of a claim I think against Disney for being the inspiration behind "Mr. Litwak" from Wreck-it-Ralph. But he seems more tickled by it than anything else. Walter doesn't seem to have a Persona. He's just him. =)
I had no idea that GBF was a Bobby Mitchell parody — until this article.
It makes sense. It is allowed. And it is commonly done — as are the lawsuits. Much of this is discussed above — shout out to @inverse and @dagamedoc for their analysis.
Personally, I loved this line from the decision: And when GBF loses his title, the character literally explodes, unlike Plaintiff.
Mitchell came off as a real jerk in king of kong. I find it hard to believe there is any way of editing that movie to paint him as that big of a knucklehead without some of it being true.
I assume this is why Regular Show's 30 minute special "Exit 9B" hasn't been reaired since it's premiere back in October 2012. GBF was a prominent antogonist in it. Shame, since it's also the episode that introduced Thomas.
What a tool, I'm glad he lost. Regular Show is fantastic.
dont like the guy.in the documentary king of kong i found it hard to believe he was real and not a villain created for the movie,he's just...cant say it without nintendolife censoring me but i realy dislike him,and now that he tries to sue people over nothing i hate him even more
Hint at GBF Jr.?
Oh my god I had no idea GBF was a parody of someone in real life. This is hilarious. xD
I can't believe he tried to sue over it, South Park does much worse things to people!
First time I see Nintendo Life talk about the Regular Show show. For once.
Also, this line made me laugh: "And when GBF loses his title, the character literally explodes, unlike Plaintiff."
"Good show! Jolly good show!" (I'm sorry. I had to. For the sake of Regular Show. One of the greatest shows I have seen on Cartoon Network in YEARS.)
I don't think billy boy is that mainstream for people to pick on the connection, well at least before this news. I guess if a more mature show like Family Guy or South Park did a parody on him, he might take it as more of a compliment (or not).
If it's really a hard on parody expect his son to come for revenge on the people that wronged his dad.
@TwilightV I never thought about that until you mention it. I only seen it twice on TV and I just assume it showed when I'm not watching, they don't show reruns of the specials that often.
The judge's comments are hilarious.
Lmfao thats hilarious! Wow though. They harmlessly pay him tribute on the show clearly showing they're fans of him and he sues? What a jerk.
I wonder if he's also suing the movie "Pixels"?
Guess he isn't getting a fistful of quarters from this one! I did enjoy the documentary The King of Kong though this guy always came off as being a bit on the arrogant side.
Watch the documentary "King of Kong" and you will see what an idiot Mitchell really is. A guy with such poor sportsmanship should deserves nothing more.
The Regular Show is awesome, it would be an honor to be made fun of on that show. That episode is great!
@majinx07 Heh! Glad to be of service!
@Ralizah Adventure Time is hilarious. Maybe YOU'RE a Giant Bearded Face if you fail to appreciate its magnificence.
Wow that judge is awesome!
@Dr_Corndog I haven't enjoyed any of Cartoon Network's original programming for a long time. Too many weird shows full of gross art and strange humor. I get that there is an audience for that kind of show, but I'm definitely not part of it.
Disney has been getting some decent shows, at least. I really enjoy Gravity Falls and kind of like Star Vs. the Forces of Evil.
@BaffleBlend Because its still incredibly good.
Oh I'm so thankful we have laws that are for parody. I also love the judge's comments comparing him to the character.
@vonseux According to the Regular Show Wikia, "He made his debut in the Season 2 episode 'High Score'."
Here's a link to the second season.
http://kisscartoon.me/Cartoon/Regular-Show-Season-02
I can't believe this guy loses his case, but the magician guy who sued for Kadabra bending spoons like he does won and made it so they could never again print another Kadabra card. These seem like similar cases, different outcome.
@Aneira You are aware that King of Kong is full of scripted drama and conflict, right?
While the reasons given are hilariously ridiculous, I think it's the court's way of blatantly explaining how it's a parody and therefore protected by the law.
@Ralizah I'm definitely with you there. Whatever happened to more mature shows (relatively speaking) like "Generator Rex" and "Sym-bionic Titan" (the latter of which was tragically cancelled way too early)? The only thing I still watch on Cartoon Network is the Pokémon animé.
@sketchturner As a 44 year old gamer, that has been gaming his whole life. I really enjoyed Pixels!
@Aneira
I wholeheartedly agree with what you said. I really don't like Billy Mitchell's condescending tone of voice. The huge head with arms is probably a caricature of his over-inflated ego.
What a cry baby.. I'd be honored to be parodied on such a good show. I love Regular Show for being an homage to the 90's (80's a lot too)
I remember watching 1 episode and I wasn't liking it at all at first btw. Same thing with Adventure Time, Futurama, Simpsons and South Park. Not sure why why though, maybe I'm difficult and apprehensive to new things.
@BaffleBlend
I've decided to be the one person who isn't a regular show fanboy responding to your post. I don't know why it's still a thing either, but I also don't know how Family Guy, The Simpsons, or tons of other shark jumping shows are still things as well.
That said, Family Guy and Simpsons were originally gold...I barely got through one episode of Regular Show.
And to people referencing South Park: they have a team of lawyers that find ways to squeeze by lawsuits. One of which is not every saying something directly about someone. Saying Mitchell flat out "cheats" isn't something South Park would do. They'd just show him cheating without saying it.
OH, MY CHIN!
Many people already have tried suing Family Guy for making fun of them. It didn't work.
What a loser, it's common knowledge there's parody laws to stop people like him suing anyone and i wonder if WB/Cartoon Network will counter-sue him? Reminds me of Lindsay Lohan trying to sue Rockstar for using her 'likeness' on the GTAV cover.
Arent parodies protected by law anyway?
Any normal person would love it.
I totally knew that was Billy in that episode of Regular show. I thought it totally ruined his reputation, but that's just me.
still a funny episode tbh
That judge's statement is rife with sarcasm.
@inverse: I totally agree with you. Billy Mitchell is a douchebag, and deserves no quarter on this. I hated him after watching king of kongs, and I doubt that will ever change. This only intensifies it.
While I liked (The) King of Kong(: A Fistful of Quarters), I honestly doubt Mitchell is 100% accurately portrayed in that movie, as everybody else that stars in it. It is possible, he does have a celebrity ego, though, I believe.
@DarkKirby That was the first thing I thought of when I read this. Family Guy has a huge track record for making fun of famous people and it hasn't been stopped.
He may have lost the case. But I'm willing to bet that, right now, Billy Mitchell is just loving all the attention he is getting. Yes, we are feeding his very large head.
Parody is legal in this country. Why did he think he could win this case?
@BaffleBlend Because people enjoy it obviously -.-
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...