Courtesy of the internet and its never-ending ability to make a lot of noise, Nintendo's senior management will know only too well that some of the company's most vocal fans were rather disappointed with the company's E3 showing. Its focus on near-term releases meant there were plenty of previously announced titles, while some new releases failed to excite fans - for various reasons.
At the recent AGM Shareholder's Q & A, Satoru Iwata and Shigeru Miyamoto were asked about the perceivably small line-up of titles that was shown. In an answer relatively spiky by his standards, Shigeru Miyamoto defended Nintendo's focus on games that were then playable on the show floor, highlighting the differing approaches of Sony and Microsoft in addition to the conceptual nature of Virtual Reality products.
... I had a solid feeling that our trade customers appreciated the very fact that they were able to play the software which soon would be released into the market and that many of them were Nintendo-like software titles. Other than Nintendo, the major hardware manufacturers, Sony and Microsoft, also had booths, and I got the general impression that they were showcasing not only the products for this year but also many products for next year or the year after and, because of that, introductions for many of their software titles were done visually, not with playable demos. Also, many demonstrations for virtual reality devices have been conducted at recent trade shows, and at this year's E3, I noticed a number of dream-like demonstrations for which the schedule and format for commercialization are unknown. The current software for these virtual reality devices cannot be played simultaneously by a number of people, and since it is generally expected that the development for the applicable software for a high-performance device will take two to three years, there were a number of visual demonstrations for virtual reality devices. Amid this atmosphere, because the visitors to our booth were able to pick up the controllers and try out the playable software, I believe they were able to appreciate, among other things, our focus that Wii U is a home video game system that we would like people to enjoy in their living rooms. I have participated in a number of media interviews, and the comments from reporters also attest this impression.
Miyamoto-san did acknowledge the perception that Nintendo was light on games at the show, however. Satoru Iwata went further in accepting some of the criticisms levelled at the company, and reiterated that the approach to each E3 does vary.
We recognize that we have let down a number of the online viewers of this year's E3, especially the avid Nintendo fans, because we did not show what they had expected. On the other hand, since E3 was originally a U.S. trade show, when we consider what kind of messages we should dispatch and in what fashion, while we have to take into consideration the impression that we may give to people outside the U.S., we have been very mindful about how we can maximize our immediate business in the U.S. this year.
...Once again, about the reason why at E3 this year we focused on the titles that will be released in the near future, as Mr. Miyamoto just said, which points we should focus on at E3 change every year depending on the development status of each product and future deployment schedule. When we think it necessary to discuss future products even if the release timing is yet to be determined, we may do so without being able to discuss the details, and when we have more concrete proposals on the products to be released in the near future, we will try to explain the appeal of that product as best as we can. Since we determine our E3 theme each year, you might have had quite a different impression this year in comparison to last year. We are listening to people's opinions and we will try to improve next year and beyond.
As has been discussed, Nintendo's focus on the 'near term' at E3 may have been down to an awkward transition towards the NX in 2016, in addition to other longer term projects not being ready to show. In any case, it seems that Nintendo is listening to feedback while considering the positives from its E3.
Considering E3 with a couple of weeks of hindsight, do you think Nintendo was right or wrong to focus on games heading to Wii U and 3DS up to Spring 2016, rather than looking further ahead? Let us know.
[source nintendo.co.jp]
Comments 77
Could have at least shown something to look forward to and blow us away for next year while still focusing on the pretty average stuff Announced* for this year
Can Miyamoto please just stick to game development? Why does he have ANY SAY in their marketing department? Makes absolutely no sense to me at all. Let people who know the western market make the decisions.
@Evenmoresteven So you want Reggie to do E3... yeah, no.
Ugh, the Digital Event still sucked guys, like seriously, did no-one at Nintendo notice before it went live?!
@EverythingAmiibo No, I am saying it may very well be time for a change in leadership. I love Nintendo's development teams, but the marketing and PR is absolutely atrocious.
That's 3 Nintendo Muppet images out of 4 articles. That's cool.
@Evenmoresteven Yep, I think you're right, though it should've happened 5 years ago and it won't even happen now
@BLPs 'Scuse me? You mean to say that the higher-ups had never seen the Digital Event before it aired... tell me I'm misunderstanding you. Kiddo.
Nintendo are so detached from reality these days it's a joke! How can they act like its natural to just show upcoming releases when Nintendo them selves have been showing games at previous e3's that are many years away from release. They didn't mind showing Zelda u two years ago when they wanted to sell a few Wii U's. I'm afraid to say that I don't think I'll ever buy another Nintendo product. At least until Iwata is gone anyway.
@BLPs Fixed it
@Boxmonkey boy, some consumer you are. Boycotting a system until that person goes off.
I don't think showing a LITTLE BIT of what you have in store for the next year or so wouldn't have been good. It would have saved them some criticism. I just don't get why it is so bad to show what you have up your sleeve when give everyone else the impression you got nothing. it's not smart.
just a freakin' zelda Wii u 15 sec footage. or trailer. MAN HOW would it hurt them?
It would have been better if they'd say they were trying something new this year and only focusing on the next 12 months. Instead they've tried to make it seem like they've always used E3 to focus on the next 12 months, which we know is not true. This just makes what they're saying sound like very dishonest excuses. They show stuff that's 2 or 3 years away from release usually, so the fact there was nothing like that this year just now makes it look like there's nothing in the pipeline.
A lot of words for saying pretty much nothing. Still, I have hope next year's E3 will be a better one.
I think Nintendo could have given better reassurance that there are still big titles on the way to the Wii U and 3DS without taking the Final Fantasy VII approach of making a huge announcement without having so much as a screenshot. I'm sure a happy medium can be found by next year's E3.
I don't think anyone is looking for Nintendo to display idea concepts at E3. If they only wnat to show near to release games, why did they show 4 titles that didn't release until a year+ in 2014 like Zelda U, StarFox concept, Wooly World, and Mario Maker?
I honestly believe the biggest reason for not showcasing the Wii U's future titles is because there are no future titles. Xenoblade aside, 2015 is filled with $40 games that seem to be a stopgap till their next console hits the market. If they want this new console to be a hit, they simply can't focus to much on the Wii U, because all teams are needed to create a decent launch line-up for (next year's) NX.
@Peach64 Whilst this is true for many of the comments they have made after this E3, as in that they are giving off the impression that their trying to make us believe that this has always been how they've approached E3, they did make mention of this E3's particular focus prior to E3. So... people were indeed informed that they were focusing on games releasing this year.
If Nintendo sticks to this trend then E3 next year will be loaded with content because we wont have seen it all before. The biggest issue this year was most of what they showed, we have known about for what feela like years and the few surprises were smaller or spin off games. What they cant do is show us all their cards through out the year in directs and then expect E3 to be well received with little new content
This a lot of of talking for what essentially boils down to "we didn't show much because we don't have much to show".
The near-term games are fine but how is a Metroid spinoff, Fire Emblem, Zelda spinoff 3DS game that will release "in 2016" without definitive dates near term. The stuff that are near term are Devil's Third, Xenoblade, Fatal Frame, and Mario Maker and they only really focused on Mario Maker which honestly doesn't need a whole ton of time to explain. Animal Crossing were quick spinoff games that scream "milking." Yoshi's Woolly World was showcased way too much for a game that was to release in Japan and Europe in a couple of weeks. By that time any U.S. consumer would have already looked up if it's any good on YouTube. So Nintendo's brass are still out of touch.
They can show near future releases all they want - that's NOT the problem. The problem is that these titles need to not be Mario Tennis and Animal freaking Party.
I for one do not consider Nintendo's focus on 2015 games to be the main problem of their E3 Digital Event. It is a criticism to be had, but one that I can also see the reasons for and the strengths to. Naturally the best way of going about things would be to have a balance of 2015 and 2016 games, a strength I feel Microsoft's conference had over the 2015 focused Nintendo and the 2016 focused Sony, but I can see how Nintendo's approach to their Digital Event could have worked well.
So my problem with Nintendo's E3 this year was not their focus on 2015 games, but the way they went about it. Shortly prior to E3, they had shown off new reveals such as Super Pokémon Mystery Dungeon and Chibi-Robo: Zip Lash, as well as the first gameplay footage of Project Treasure. Such reveals I feel would have made more sense for E3, particularly the Chibi-Robo reveal, as it would have been a nice thing to break up the focus on each of Nintendo's more major franchises.
In regards to my point on how their were certain games they shouldn't have revealed prior to E3, these were but some of many games that I feel should have been given attention during the Nintendo Digital Event. Nintendo have many 2015 games set for this year, but there were notable absences such as Fatal Frame V, Devil's Third, Rodea The Sky Soldier, and the many indies/eShop games coming out this year. These are games that should have been included in the Digital Event, and not reserved for just the Nintendo Treehouse, or outright not shown at all.
This I feel to be their bigger problem with their E3 performance; the fact that they failed to properly play out their approach to it's full potential. They had plenty of games for 2015 and early 2016 that they could have included in their Digital Event and spice it up, but they ultimately chose not to.
@BLPs - Sorry BLPs I got nothing left, left it all in the NX rumour thread-of-the-day. This looks like it will just be more of the same.
E3 2015 just ended and all we have are NX in 2016, EE 2016 articles. It's worse than the US presidential election. Be thankful you aren't following that. Do your weekly tabloids follow it? Donald Trump would be on every front cover. Bush. Clinton. Whoever wins, we all lose. However bad Nitnedo gets, at least it's just my distraction, not my life in the balance.
So, Shigeru Miyamoto frowns up on the idea of showing teasers for games that won't be released for a year or two.
Meanwhile, we were shown a teaser for Zelda U last year, and it likely won't be out until next fall on NX, and the rest of the world is still waiting for Xenoblade Chronicles X, which was revealed over two years ago and was dragged to E3 three years in a row.
He's basically demonizing MS and Sony for doing what Nintendo has always done. In other words, he's making lame excuses because they didn't have anything to show because those games are in development for NX and they aren't ready to show them just yet.
"do you think Nintendo was right or wrong to focus on games heading to Wii U and 3DS up to Spring 2016,"
Well that depends. If Nitneod is actually planning on having new Wii U games throught out 2016 and early 2017 then they should have showed them.
But if Nintedo has nothing left for Wii U b/c it has all moved to NX for a 2016 launch, well then they probably did the right thing to promote what Wii U has left.
Tell me what Nintneod has behind closed doors and what year (don't care about the month) NX will launch and then we'll know just how badly they screwed up. Either way it was bad, we just don't really know how bad.
Fans are always going to complain about one little thing at e3. Wind Waker was arguably a better showing at e3 2002 than that "connectivity" disaster of e3 2003, but still suffered annoying backlash because it's wasn't anything like the "mature" Zelda demo shown at Spaceworld 2000.
E3 was originally created to be a trade show where publishers showed off the products they had upcoming so that retailors would get excited about the possibility of selling those games. If you look at it that way then Nintendo's approach of showing only what they will launch in the next year is spot on. Retailors care about what products they will be able to sell this holiday season. They will worry about next year when next year arrives.
Of course, the end consumers have a different agenda. They want Nintendo to give them reasons to be excited about the future of the platform that they own. With the Wii U struggling and the NX already announced, I think that most Wii U owners were looking for assurance that Nintendo was not going to abandon the Wii U early. They wanted Nintendo to announce at least a couple of new games that would help them to remain excited about the future of the Wii U. The opposite is what actually happened. Nintendo mostly focused on games that we already knew about and the few surprises that they did not have much impact. I think that is the main reason why Wii U owners are upset.
All I can say is you portrayed yourself as a bunch of Muppets both figuratively and literally.
@rjejr; Happy 50th!! "Whoever wins, we all lose." I would say which ever one of the 3 Stooges, (Miyamoto, Iwata, or Reggie) is talking and making decisions, we all lose. The fact they were Muppets this year is so fitting...
The actual presentation itself with the puppets was amazing, it was only the lack of announcements that was the disappointment....if they'd done exactly the same thing with better games we all would have been over the moon.
I still say I'm glad Nintendo focused on what is on the way now instead of later next year. Unlike the rest of the industry they give regular updates of games throughout the year via Directs so they don't have to put all of their eggs in one basket. They introduced new games (if you liked them or not is not the point) and gave semi solid timelines for the rest of the year. Aside from Fallout, Nintendo is the only company definitely getting my money because I actually know when games are coming out in a few months and can plan for it. Everything else becomes a nebulous "sure I think I'll get that when it comes out..."
However the internet is never satisfied. sigh
@Ryno - Thanks. Didn't expect to see you around these parts any longer.
And the muppets was the best part. But I do kind of feel like Nintneod is more likely to pull a Google rather than a Sega. All VC, all the time. NX will be the "retro" console for all those fugly retro games.
@rjejr: Oh, you will still see me around. I like too many people around here to ever leave. Plus, following Nintendo is like watching a building on fire. You can't help but watch as it burns down to the ground.
People can still play the games you plan on releasing this year all while you show some tidbits of what fans have to look forward to later next year.
It's not rocket science.
I think the reason Nintendo decided to show near-term games this year was purely driven by commercial thoughts. E3 is a big marketing tool and they wanted to give their upcoming titles a big boost.
Showing 2016 games however doesn't help much commercially, because people tend to forget a lot of things during the course of a year. So showing future titles would just have been a waste of a marketing opportunity.
I don't see why they shouldn't decide differently every year, based on what the company needs right now. They can't always make an 2014 E3 approach.
In 2014 they needed the buzz and to spark some hope amongst their fans and players. This year they need more immediate marketing.
@RatKing64 My point exactly! And Miyamoto stated it himself, this year(!) they wanted the retailers to see playable demos, not trailers.
But I don't get why Wii U owners need any "assurance that Nintendo was not going to abandon the Wii U early". I don't make my game experience depending on the E3. E3 is just a couple of days during the year, so what happens on the rest of the year is more important to me than what happens on those few days.
@doomgc I think if they had done that, everyone would be ranting like "What? They already showed a gameplay trailer and now they have nothing more than a short trailer to show? That game will be heavily delayed". And this would've sparked dozens of new rumours regarding NX etc.
@Ryu_Niiyama Yeah me too. I think most of the people who are complaining weren't on the E3. Because if they were, they probably would be euphoric and enthousiastic because of they E3 experience. And I'm just guessing because I never was there. Maybe I should go to the Gamescom.
@Peach64 Yeah that would've been better! I think it's a problem of communication.
@OneBagTravel: I'd say it was because a)in 2014 Nintendo needed the buzz to create more attention and momentum for the Wii U and b) they didn't have much to show that near release.
@TruenoGT Well said!
And what about those watching at home? What do you have to offer them since they aren't at E3 playing the games on the show floor?
Edit: So transformation (the theme of the direct) is taking place in the near future? What do you have in mind because I didn't see anything drastically different?
@jjmesa16 The people at home know that these games are near term and not nebulous ideas we'll be seeing for the next 4 E3's. That said, it would have been wise to preface the Federation Force game with something to soften the blow.
I get what they're saying, but E3 is no longer just for the US. The whole thing with the World Championships being NA only was bad enough for the rest if the fans across the globe, then they ended the presentation on a US only promotion with Best Buy. It doesn't matter that it started as a US trade show, it's a big deal across the globe now.
I do appreciate the focus on titles coming soon though. Obviously the whole "playable right now" thing is something I don't get the benefit from, but at least I know I'll have the ones I want by the end if the year. But again, whilst the others might be selling dreams they do it for a reason: dreams sell. And this is Nintendo, just logos with the promise of more info next year would have been enough for the core fans. You know, like how last year they teased us with the dream of Star Fox.
In other words, their competitor's near-terms are just a dream for Nintendo.
This is my personal response to Nintendo's Digital event:
I watched it. I saw there were 3 Wii U games coming from Sept to Dec I wanted (which I already knew about). I saw there was one WEIRD game announced for the first 3 months of 2016. I decided this wasn't enough to occupy me. I bought a PS4 to fill in the holes.
The problem is for Nintendo now is where I was solely buying Wii U games (including some dubiously worthwhile purchases), my money will now be shared between them and Sony. And when it comes to the NX, I may just be happy to wait on upgrading because I'll have things to play on the PS4. I'm guessing I'm not the only person who is in this position (or with an XB1). If they could of held my excitement and attention I would of likely not bought the PS4, which I think shows why E3 is there to hype the future. The truth is games coming out in 3 months by nature CAN'T be as exciting as those future mirages of massive games.
@rjejr Did you mean to spell Nintendo wrong every time you spelled it? XD
It's not their APPROACH to E3 that they need to change - it's bringing better games. Games people want.
We want info on games that are releasing this year, yes, but it wouldn't hurt them to show info, at least a teaser, of games already in production for 2016 and 2017, like they did when they originally announced Golden Sun 3. I think at this point in time I'm sick of Mario maker before it even releases.
@ottospooky Which games?
1. The same game with a different coat of paint?
2. New game/IP with new ideas?
3. Sequel #150?
The other big problem here is that "fans" want all of these. It irritates me when people generalize fans as if they are all the same, which they are clearly not. I for one am actually happy from all the content in the Nintendo Digital Event. Yes, most of the games I wanted were already announced, but they didn't stop existing just because they weren't announced at some bigger event.
Oh please Nintendo, no one cars that your software is going to be here in the short term. They care that it's good. Most of the people enjoying your software are either being polite or tremendous fanboys, there's not much to get excited about with this lineup.
One of the biggest problems with E3 though was everything they showed was stuff that was announced like a year or 2 ago. There was not much of anything new or even wanted. The Animal crossing was a joke, Metroid... not what people wanted... Zelda has mixed emotions but overall I think was the best newest thing shown.... was there anything else new shown? But really, E3 people expect to see announcement of new stuff, stuff to look forward to. This E3 had next to nothing of that.
It's clear Wii U messaging is coming to an end. The messaging of 2016 wasn't ready and wouldn't have helped sales of current hardware. Can't really blame them for the PR lines. It is what it is
@Ryno - "like watching a building on fire"
I read that as bull dog on fire, that was pretty funny.
@LztheQuack I wasn't necessarily generalising fans. And I definitely agree with you that everyone wants something different from Nintendo - that's what nostalgia does to people.
But it's fair to say that the response to E3 for Nintendo this year has been overwhelmingly poor. this was not because of the format of the presentation, it was the fact that they didn't bring what people wanted. Even if people have different expectations, they still feel negative at what they showed.
The one issue I have with the way the games were presented was in the pacing. The Good Feel, Yoshi knitting lady video was cute, and it was good to get an insight into the creative process, and I loved the anecdote about knitting a Yoshi for the dev team, but that should have been edited. It was too long. Also, that was Wooly World's SECOND E3, and it's been shown in at least two Directs in between. All the time I was thinking, 'show something new! Want to see new stuff!'
And also the end of the Digital Presentation was shocking. They spent far too long on their Mario 30th anniversary social media experiment (if that's what it is!) I was so stoked, gearing up for the 'and one more thing...' moment - the reveal of a new 3D Mario. And then, nothing. That was it. The online chat for the stream I was watching just sort of caught fire with this massively negative outcry. That didn't help. People remember the last moments of these things, and I believe this contributed psychologically to fans' opinions of the Digital Event.
Nintendo basically killed the Wii U at this E3.
The only game currently slated for 2016 is "Shin Megami Tensei x Fire Emblem" which looks....weird (to put it lightly).
And possibly a new Zelda game (which will probably launch at the end of 2016 alongside the superior NX version).
@ottospooky They can't release a new 3D Mario only like a year after 3D world.
@LilC Technically, it's been a couple of years since 3D World, which released in Holiday 2013. That was two years after 3D Land which came out Holiday 2011. Plus it's been five years since the last Galaxy game and quite a few more than Mario 64 which I would seriously take a proper sequel to... I wasn't just thinking it would be a game in the 3D World series
@Hitokage - No, but if I tried to spell it wrong every time it would probably come out correctly more often than it does now.
It's perfectly fine only showing us what's coming out soon. They keeping hanging on this idea, and it's obscuring the real issue, which is that there isn't much good stuff coming out soon. There should never be a period in a company's lineup that's as sparse as Nintendo's is now.
I like Miyamoto, always have.. but this is nonsense. I don't think anyone views E3 as a US only event due to the digital age of not only today, but since before videogame websites became the norm via the news, magazines etc etc.
Nintendo were extremely light in what they had to show and announce, third parties have almost left the Wii U completely and Nintendo didn't exactly show / do much to win back any confidence from not only any potential consumers but its current user base.. E3 2016 has got to bring it big time.
@Bolt_Strike Well, I care that their software is going to be here in the short term, it's put me in the predicament on whether I'll have enough money to get each of the games I want upon release. So... that means that their is someone who cares and thus it means that the assumption that no one cares is false.
I'm a little confused on the way you worded the rest of your comment. Are you referring to the enjoyment of present software or the enjoyment of looking forward to their current line-up?
In regards to enjoying their current software; I myself have been having a tremendous amount of fun with Splatoon, and I've been finding myself surprised at how much I've been enjoying Fossil Fighters Frontier. As for their upcoming 2015 software, I think I'm quite pleased with a line-up of Yoshi's Wooly World, Rodea The Sky Soldier, Fatal Frame V, Star Fox Zero, and Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash. There are also 3DS titles that intrigue me such as Chibi-Robo Zip Lash, though as noted earlier, I am in the predicament on whether I'll have the money available for all the games that are releasing this year.
@rjejr: I like your analogy better!
How come Nintendo won't just use some of their money to produce more games? Not enough personnel? Then throw the money over some other studios to make games for you. There's not enough games to keep up interest and attract game developers, investors and consumers.
@Ryno - I saw you had a lot of pics in the other thread but no Wii Mini. Which made me think I need a pic of a Wii Mini w/ NX on the side.
There's nothing wrong with focusing on the nearby games if there's enough content there to fill the show. However, it was lacking this year since most games were either already announced, or they were spin-offs of series fans were really wanting to see a main-game version of.
Nothing wrong focusing near-term, but what should be high profile 3rd party games that are aimed at more mature gamers (Devil's Third, Fatale Frame) missing in maim presentation, and a lack of 3rd party and mature titles are routinely mentioned as major drawbacks, and then to leave off the Geo racing game, which looks visually sublime and is said to max out the Wii U (which is routinely critisized for its lack of power compared to M&S), despite all these titles being featured in the Treehouse features, it just seemed frustrating to instead project Mario Tennis, a badly introduced Metroid game that felt like a bonus game (thus squandering the impact such a prestigious association deserves), and also leave out Project Treasure, which was showcased weeks before but with little information. So Nintendo could have gone into depth with these titles and explained.the. more etc. But initially I was so wtf about it all because these titles that didn't even get a mention in the maim show had all been recently showcased, which gave the impession that Nintendo must have a lot more up their sleeve if they are this confident to leak so much before E3. And don't even get me started on Retro's trolling-tweet and no show. Of course, all the games I mentioned are still coming, but it was odd and irritating that Nintendo, to focus near term, didn't even showcase games that are worth boasting about.
I can't say anyone had a good E3 showing based on my interest level. Nintendo is in transition, which is fine. My current systems will get plenty of play. I'm trying to go back to acknowledging my role as a consumer: my money goes toward what I want, and I can't worry about sales figures or quality of marketing.
Seems like everyone wants vaporware on at current tech level niche VR system. Thanks ninty for some actual games, but you can keep ac amiibo
You know your E3 was a disaster when weeks later, you're still making excuses for it.
They really should stop talking about it; they shouldn't have apologised in the first place. Showing actual gameplay footage and demos (unlike Microsoft who just showed a bunch of trailers that rarely indicated what kind of game was being trailered because there was no game footage at all) is very positive; they could have had more sizzle by showing more about what we know is upcoming. I totally get holding things back; historically Nintendo has saved big surprises for Directs unrelated to E3, but clearly they could have done a little bit more.
I like the focus for the near term instead of stuff I can't buy. What I don't like is the fact that there was absolutely nothing worth mentioning that I didn't know about already.
Yep, it was a bad e3 for nintendo. It feels well calculated though, like they knew what they are doing. That bit I can appreciate.
@xSATANACHISTx
"How come Nintendo won't just use some of their money to produce more games? Not enough personnel? Then throw the money over some other studios to make games for you."
Wow.
Of course, they do - to a limited extent. For better or worse, their careful focus is exactly the reason Nintendo games stand out.
I am not going down the road about Nintendo showing stuff releasing soon, or showing stuff coming next year.
My honest opinion is, a lot of people were disappointed with this year's E3, simply because last year, they blew the competition away. It was always going to be hard to replicate, and even harder to beat.
I am sure there will be a few decent first and second party games coming next year, along with SOME third party and some great e-shop titles. However, can we really blame Nintendo, if they are re-directing some od their resources into 'NX', and it possible launch line up? If they do, people will complain they are not trying hard enough to get games out on the Wii U, and if they don't, people will also complain that they should be concentrating on the launch line up of their next console. Either way, they cannot win.
All I could say is that while their Digital Event was a bit lukewarm, they still showed off things I'm interested in playing. The fact that it all comes out in the near future is the best part, I wouldnt want to see a bunch of video game trailers with no release dates in sight.
That's not to say the other folks had bad showings, it was mostly games with such far off release dates that they couldnt even mention a release window.....but they could mention exclusivity deals.
I usually expect E3 2015 to hype up games in the next 6-8 months, not the next 2-3 years.
lol what i dont get s why are they doing interviews with nintendo they dont got nothing to show, cant talk about NX, already announced release dates for what they showed so all they have left is to be hypocrites about how they treat E3 >.>
I still didn't think it was THAT BAD of an E3 event for nintendo, just lacked major titles to be shown, and they still have a year to showcase games that could still be coming this year to the systems or even in the first quarter of next year...it's hard to say what they're working on. The only thing that's probably stopping them from making a ton of games for the Wii U and 3DS is due to making that quality of life thing and the NX...with the fact that they don't have as many teams split up to work on that many projects anymore. What they need, and I've seen plenty of things on this site to hopefully lead them to this, is a system that's also a portable...one system for nintendo to work on, which would bring more games and in better quantities, rather than long droughts. It's basically the long droughts that are hurting the Wii U right now, and they could fix it with this situation, but they also need second and third parties to help them out too. You can't make a system, and have a game out every other month to get people hyped, you have to have many games coming out per month (at least 3-4) and have a large variety of games (sports, sims, adventure, action, horror, rpg, strategy, puzzle, party and platformer). And they cannot all be children games...nintendo needs to start catering to all ages and all players. I really hope they improve this and start listening to people, rather than hiding in their offices and just 'thinking' this is what people want. If their next system has a Mario Adventure, Smash, Mario Kart, Zelda, Metroid and Animal Crossing come out within a year or at launch, they could have a powerful system that can compete. Only time will tell.
And still, the E3 hate continues... also, again with the armchair CEO's... Your ideas of firing Any of the three major executives at Nintendo would hold more weight of ANY of those demanding/requesting their removal had any experience running a fortune be 500-type company for the last ten years. Reading speculative nonsense about things a majority of us know little to nothing about, is getting weird...
"I had a solid feeling that our trade customers appreciated the very fact that they were able to play the software which soon would be released into the market"
But E3 is a consumer and press show, not retail/trade...
I think it was good for them to focus on recent software. The fact is that the games all look great, it's just that they're reusing many of the same engines from previous games, so nothing really seemed "original". In terms of content, Nintendo is killing it! So much on 3DS this year and next!
Focusing on showing upcoming software isn't bad in itself, I think the issue here was how lackluster said titles were. Their E3 was pretty much a generic Direct, full of mostly the same damn things they've been showing for a while or have already plugged before recently (Yoshi, Mario Maker, Chibi Robo, etc.). Then they just threw in some new games that aren't really interesting at all, except for Paper Jam.
If they would've decided on making better games rather than these seemingly boring ones, or if they would've shown glimpses of games that might come next year (y'know, new games, not stuff like Hyrule Warriors Legends), then maybe we wouldn't be having this discussion. But they effed up with their line-up, disappointed many, and here we are.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...