@Kermit1 I only read one sentence from the wiki, I want to read more because I just can’t believe what I just read, but at the same time, why did I do that to myself! Why! Now if you excuse me, the bleach and eyes need to go make bread together.
Nintendo are like woman, You love them for whats on the inside, not the outside…you know what I mean! Luzlane best girl!
(My friend code is SW-7322-1645-6323, please ask me before you use it)
Youre one of those peope that tend to twist things around as usual.
I by the way Im not saying or hinted at wanting trashy sexual games like Perky Little Things off of the shelves and not sold in stores. Im just saying that im surprised that Nintendo would let stuff like that go on in stores and turn a blind eye yada yada.
Yeah, nah. I'm not really twisting your words, if anything you're the one kinda being a bit dishonest in this argument here
I mean your initial point was that you were shocked that Nintendo and/or Walmart would allow a game "like that" to be available, "especially at Walmart". And that you were "surprised Nintendo would even be ok with a game like that in the first place". So basically, you are offended by the game existing and would rather it not be available in one way or another
But now you're saying that you have "not saying (sic) or hinted" (ugh, mixed tense) that you wanted it "of (sic) the shelves and not sold in stores". I mean which is it? Either you take your initial stance and would have the game NOT available at stores and therefore disagree with your new position OR you are ok with it being on shelves and sold in stores and therefore are ok with Nintendo "allowing" Walmart to stock it
Can't be both, these are mutually exclusive positions. I mean, we know which one it is. You clearly weren't happy that the game is available to buy. You were animated enough about it to create a thread on it. A thread literally titled "can't believe Nintendo would allow a game like that". Not, I don't understand why people buy games like this. No. You can't believe this game is allowed, presumably to exist
And now that people have pointed out the silliness of the position you're trying to reframe your position. Which is the natural thing to do. Probably the more mature thing to do would be to either respectfully disagree or to admit you didn't consider your position and have changed your mind. But hey, it's the internet right? That may be wishful thinking on my part there that would ever happen!
The sad thing is that as so many people have tight ends it has thrusted the game out of the spotlight. It's a shame as the developers bared naked their hard work to erect a game foreplaying an experience of titillation.
as I said before, youre just twisting my words around just so you can look innocent blah blah.
all i ever frikkin said was that Im surprired that pretty much both Walmart and Nintendo would eve be ok with selling trashy games like that.
Period.
Those games arent for me which im glad anyway. If i want trashy sex sleaze entertainment in my life, ill just go watch Porky's.
I am very aware that there are other people/gamers out there that are into trashy sex gmes whether its a stupid Leisure Suit Larry or Dead or Alive o whateve. Good for them.
Youre one of those peope that tend to twist things around as usual.
I by the way Im not saying or hinted at wanting trashy sexual games like Perky Little Things off of the shelves and not sold in stores. Im just saying that im surprised that Nintendo would let stuff like that go on in stores and turn a blind eye yada yada.
Yeah, nah. I'm not really twisting your words, if anything you're the one kinda being a bit dishonest in this argument here
I mean your initial point was that you were shocked that Nintendo and/or Walmart would allow a game "like that" to be available, "especially at Walmart". And that you were "surprised Nintendo would even be ok with a game like that in the first place". So basically, you are offended by the game existing and would rather it not be available in one way or another
But now you're saying that you have "not saying (sic) or hinted" (ugh, mixed tense) that you wanted it "of (sic) the shelves and not sold in stores". I mean which is it? Either you take your initial stance and would have the game NOT available at stores and therefore disagree with your new position OR you are ok with it being on shelves and sold in stores and therefore are ok with Nintendo "allowing" Walmart to stock it
Can't be both, these are mutually exclusive positions. I mean, we know which one it is. You clearly weren't happy that the game is available to buy. You were animated enough about it to create a thread on it. A thread literally titled "can't believe Nintendo would allow a game like that". Not, I don't understand why people buy games like this. No. You can't believe this game is allowed, presumably to exist
And now that people have pointed out the silliness of the position you're trying to reframe your position. Which is the natural thing to do. Probably the more mature thing to do would be to either respectfully disagree or to admit you didn't consider your position and have changed your mind. But hey, it's the internet right? That may be wishful thinking on my part there that would ever happen!
Forums
Topic: Perky Little Things. Cant believe Nintendo would allow a game like that
Posts 61 to 68 of 68
Sorry, this topic has been locked.