Topic: Unpopular Gaming Opinions

And what does that have to do with Kojima? The only "dirt treat" Kojima got, if you can even call it that, would be ban from Game Awards, although it his fault also, because it was him who signed the contract. Other than that, there is no evidence that Kojima was even treated like that.

@Dave24: Oh wow.....so the fact that my hate towards SEGA and me being happy that they are close to bankruptcy has inspired you to defend the Konami's policies. Especially bad ones.

I stated that the people working at SEGA were foolish to work there because they should have checked what SEGA is right now and apparently, they were dumb enough to get to SEGA and yet SEGA's decisions will cost their jobs and blah blah blah.

I don't get why people here especially those in the comment section felt so bad for SEGA when they did so many things wrong that they mocked at me but those same guys are fine with Konami being banished because of some logic that I can't figure out.

@Socar: Learn to read. What does your first sentence has to do with Kojima? I'm not defending anything - what Konami does has nothing to do with Kojima, or do you have some proof that he was treated like those people (hint: there are none, because he wasn't)

Here's my unpopular one.

Capcom>SEGA != Nintendo.

Capcom is greater than Sega but both of them together (!) equals Nintendo?

I think you're confused on how math works there chief

@Santa: != means not equal to. Atleast that's what it says in programming.

But anyways its true. I mean Capcom is struggling more than SEGA and yet they deliver quality games with the exception of few. Some games do suck from them but compared to SEGA, they don't have a horrible list of games.

But both of them can't be like Nintendo. I mean sure occasionally Nintendo can't make quality games but the thing is, most of that time, it comes from spinoffs and not their actual games.

My "not equal" sign looks like this, though:
=/=

Sega makes better pachinko machines than Nintendo therefore SEGA>Nintendo.

Mine looks like this: ≠

Sega only made:
Sonic Generations
Vanquish
Valkyria Chronicles
Sonic & All Stars Racing Transformed
Those Sega Genesis 3D Remakes
OutRun Online Arcade
And that's just the new stuff.

@arronishere: Nintendo doesn't even make Pachinko machines...how can you state something like that to even begin with?

Seriously, why oh why people like you are adoring SEGA when you deserve better from them?

First of all, it was obviously a joke. Second, no one has to agree with your rhetoric. For example, I couldn't care less about Sega in any way.

@Socar 1. I believe @arronishere was joking with that comment.
2. Hey, man! People are allowed to like something! Nobody's questioning the fact that you treat Nintendo like they're perfect and can do no wrong and deserve zero criticism!

New Nintendo 3DS is one of the worst, if not the worst, "upgrade" of the console ever made. And probably most useless, because there are really not that many games that were even worth the upgrade. And I thought Wii mini was bad.

Does the Wii Mini have an improved processor? Because I only remember it was lacking things I expected from a Wii console. The New 3DS is a decent update and I'm happy I got it instead of a regular 3DS.

I find the DSi a worse upgrade from the DS than the 3DS to N3DS. At least there are features to be used like Amiibo + better 3D unlike the DSi, which gave us a bunch of features no one used, and then they force it on us in the 3DS again and still no one is using them.

The Wii Mini is just a Wii again.

I completely forgot about DSi, although that better processor in N3DS feels just as worthless. However while N3DS did some things right, like better 3D, it also did many wrong and 2 steps back. System transfer is total, god awful mess that shows that Nintendo in this case is cancer of the industry. It's made as most backwards, confusing and overlycomplicated as you can get. And guides on internet are just as worthless, best, easiest and fastest option to do transfer is PC and then you are 100% sure, unlike crappy local, which can still end up with you redownloading everything. And getting to that miniSD card is also a chore - what was wrong with SD slot on the side? That was another huge step backwards.

Also, Wii mini is not Wii again. Cube games were not selling point for Wii, I agree, however no online? Like at all? I remember Wii having online - it was pretty bad, but it was there.

@Dave24 Personally I don't see what's wrong with System Transfer...for me it was as straightforward as I could ever imagine it being. It did take a good 2 hours...but what do you expect when transferring your whole library to a new system?

People are complaining too much of Virtual Console games being too expensive.

Seriously? 8$ for a GBA game expensive? You also have to consider the fact that its being ported to a modern console let alone the weakest system possible. If its that expensive, then obviously it must come to mind that you are getting your money's worth.

I bought Tomb Raider Anniversary for like 4$ and I didn't get my money's worth....its so boring and its just a Zelda rip off. But still, I can understand why people would like Tomb Raider because its less cryptic than Zelda and the level design's realism is better than how it is in Zelda(like how there are cracked ceilings that you can hang on to etc).

When I got something like Undertale for 10$, I got my money's worth for a short game like that because of the amount of fun I had.
You guys need to understand one thing, if a game is priced high, it obviously means that its worth the purchase and for some games that come at a cheap price, it means that you need to pay extreme caution. Of course the experience is still a subjective matter but in the end, that's probably why Nintendo is still making their games deliver quality because you get your money's worth.