@VenomousAlbino @niner personally I totally get the statement. Life is strange is such a chill, therapeutic, wholesome game, thus it fits the Nintendo “vibe” if you will. When I think Nintendo, I think pokemon, mario, Zelda, a dismal crossing and the likes, all light hearted games, not very dramatic or intense, whereas when I think Xbox or PS I think more Halo, COD, that sort of more intense action game. Life is strange just makes sense to be on switch, it’s the best market for it, I don’t see many hardcore console gamers being interested in LiS, incidentally most hardcore console gamers are on Xbox/PS, whereas Nintendo is more family friendly, casual, more adapted for non-hardcore gamers. Basically to sum it up, the Nintendo demographic is by far the best market for the LiS series.
Comments 1
Re: Soapbox: Life Is Strange Belongs On Switch. So Why Isn't It?
@VenomousAlbino @niner personally I totally get the statement. Life is strange is such a chill, therapeutic, wholesome game, thus it fits the Nintendo “vibe” if you will.
When I think Nintendo, I think pokemon, mario, Zelda, a dismal crossing and the likes, all light hearted games, not very dramatic or intense, whereas when I think Xbox or PS I think more Halo, COD, that sort of more intense action game.
Life is strange just makes sense to be on switch, it’s the best market for it, I don’t see many hardcore console gamers being interested in LiS, incidentally most hardcore console gamers are on Xbox/PS, whereas Nintendo is more family friendly, casual, more adapted for non-hardcore gamers.
Basically to sum it up, the Nintendo demographic is by far the best market for the LiS series.