@Wexter That's a stupid question as datums sounds/looks stupid. One talks, not speaks, on a keyboard. Which dumb terms must I use for the "common denominator"? Language decays, especially when loanwords replace roots, more especially when those loans contradict their etýma. is -> if. [ab]Usage/appeal to popularity fallacy is irrelevant to etýma and correctness. no one..they are: numerical disagreement. Grammar is a barbarism of ghrammatics, another word for composition as in handwriting, font, format, spacing, the looks whereas this concerns lecsis/diction as register, vocabulary, declension, spelling, placement, the meaning.
@Wexter Don't call me funny dresser, ass and presentist. By childish you mean kiddish, as everyone is a child, ageist. who -> whom. I know how dumb engineers and other handykin are; the singular is still datum, not "data point". The current authorities care about appeals to popularity instead of etýma/coiner/propriety; those subrationals don't make a case. Mass nouns are supposed to be formally singular, like cheese or sheep so you can't say "this cheeses" or "this sheeps". You abused "aka". I did put together coherent, complete statements; all you had to do was use backwards Find.
@Wexter it was your bad diction, dolt; the arrow notation makes perfect sense if you bother to read your comment. It's a waste of time to fill up a comment with redundant words when the problem in each list item is the same and you could instead read a dictionary. Data is plural; learn the Latin; will is optative auxiliary for "like to" whereas shall is future; would is desiderative auxiliary whereas should is expective.
The arsehole admin can ban me for "unusual behavior" when my comments directly related to other comments.
Comments 7
Re: A Game-Breaking Paper Mario: The Origami King Bug Has Been Discovered
issue -> problem
Re: A Game-Breaking Paper Mario: The Origami King Bug Has Been Discovered
@rjejr neither would nor nice < niais < nescius := not-skilled.
Re: No, Seriously, The Wii And Wii U Are Getting Physical Versions Of Shakedown: Hawaii This Year
physical -> real; all versions are fýsic and digital, if not real and download (virtval); will -> shall; won't -> shan't; harder -> touher
Re: No, Seriously, The Wii And Wii U Are Getting Physical Versions Of Shakedown: Hawaii This Year
@FargusPelagius not nice < niais < nescius := not-skilled, ocsýmòron
Re: Feature: Exploring The "Switch Tax" And Why Nintendo Was Right to Use Game Cards
@Wexter That's a stupid question as datums sounds/looks stupid. One talks, not speaks, on a keyboard. Which dumb terms must I use for the "common denominator"? Language decays, especially when loanwords replace roots, more especially when those loans contradict their etýma. is -> if. [ab]Usage/appeal to popularity fallacy is irrelevant to etýma and correctness. no one..they are: numerical disagreement. Grammar is a barbarism of ghrammatics, another word for composition as in handwriting, font, format, spacing, the looks whereas this concerns lecsis/diction as register, vocabulary, declension, spelling, placement, the meaning.
Re: Feature: Exploring The "Switch Tax" And Why Nintendo Was Right to Use Game Cards
@Wexter Don't call me funny dresser, ass and presentist. By childish you mean kiddish, as everyone is a child, ageist. who -> whom. I know how dumb engineers and other handykin are; the singular is still datum, not "data point". The current authorities care about appeals to popularity instead of etýma/coiner/propriety; those subrationals don't make a case. Mass nouns are supposed to be formally singular, like cheese or sheep so you can't say "this cheeses" or "this sheeps". You abused "aka". I did put together coherent, complete statements; all you had to do was use backwards Find.
Re: Feature: Exploring The "Switch Tax" And Why Nintendo Was Right to Use Game Cards
@Wexter it was your bad diction, dolt; the arrow notation makes perfect sense if you bother to read your comment. It's a waste of time to fill up a comment with redundant words when the problem in each list item is the same and you could instead read a dictionary. Data is plural; learn the Latin; will is optative auxiliary for "like to" whereas shall is future; would is desiderative auxiliary whereas should is expective.
The arsehole admin can ban me for "unusual behavior" when my comments directly related to other comments.