If you've picked up a Nintendo Switch or Nintendo Switch Lite recently, you'll be pleased to hear that Nintendo is keen to keep the console relevant for years to come (which, let's face it, probably shouldn't come as much of a shock).
During a Q+A session held at Nintendo's six-month financial results briefing, president Shuntaro Furukawa was asked about the company's pricing strategy and how the profitability of the Switch hardware might increase over time. Furukawa used the opportunity to explain that Nintendo hopes to keep selling the Switch "for as long as possible". Here's his full reply:
"We want to maintain the value of our products and sell them at their current price points for as long as possible, so we have no plans to reduce prices at this time. Because profitability can fluctuate depending on quantities produced in the future, we're not estimating any specific decrease in cost.
"We want to improve profitability by increasing the number of units sold and selling the Nintendo Switch family of hardware for as long as possible.”
Furukawa's comments echo a very similar statement made six months ago, where he revealed that Nintendo plans to "release a continuous stream of exciting titles" to keep the Switch business thriving for as long as it can.
Home consoles typically remain relevant for periods of around five to seven years before being ditched for new, fancier hardware, so the Switch should have a good while on store shelves yet. In March next year, the Switch family of systems will reach its third anniversary.
Are you hoping the Switch will be Nintendo's main focus for years to come? Are you excited for an eventual successor, or are you more than content with your current setup? Let us know your thoughts with a comment below.
[source nintendo.co.jp, via videogameschronicle.com]
Comments 112
we want to maintain the value of our product? but dont want a price decrease sounds a little backwards to me.
but it has been there policy for years no matter how bad or good something preforms
sure lots of great games to come, but at this point it should have a price drop, can see them get a lot more sales if they do.
I really hope that Nintendo keeps the Switch family around for a while. I love gaming but I don't particularly like the every few years buy a new console thing. They're EXPENSIVE! I had to miss out last gen w/the Wii U and by the time I got enough money the Switch was announced. I hope that it stays for a little closer to the 7 year life span and not the 5 year one. Plus I love the Switch and would never want to see it phased out.
THEN FIX YOUR JOY CON DRIFT ISSUES
There's no slowdown, why would they announce a price drop at this point? considering there's pokemon coming + the lite, i don't see a price drop this year.
Probably next year to resist the new generation, $50-$75 price drop by the time next gen releases would be an interesting proposition for switch
The only price drop they should consider is that of their joycons.
@Spanjard
You might be joking but I totally agree.
The damn things have a known fault and are expensive enough as it is.
Think the Lite was introduced to cater to people wanting a cheaper option. Hopefully at some point we get a ‘switch hits’ line of games that offers some of nintendos best sellers at a discount price as ive held off on stuff like kirby and yoshi purely from a value stand point.
@Spanjard
total agree, espicallly with the drift problems. should be £40
Why would they say anything else? If they said "We only want to sell the Switch until 2022" or "We're gonna cut the price next spring." They'd shoot themselves in the foot as sales would tank as people would wait for the new model or price drop.
It'll be the next 3DS. The thing just wont die. Don't worry though. Nintendolife will be there to remind you everyday why it should be killed off in the next year or so.
When all hell breaks loose with the PS5 release third parties will scatter and the switch will be left behind. Like every Nintendo console since N64.
Don't expect anymore than two possibly three years left of switch sadly.
We just want to make the monies
The new generation will slow them down a bit, maybe price cuts next year to undercut PS5. The Switch Lite's release is the price cut for this year. They don't need a pro model, but in 2-3 years a Switch 2 wouldn't be amiss so they can continue to capture scaled down ports of next gen games.
Holiday 2020 will be Nintendo's biggest challenge yet. Until then it's smooth sailing while the other platforms don't have much going on.
Yeah i can already see people gonna sell their switch to get a PS5 and then once again Nintendo will be behind two whole gens worth. the switch will be bumped down to Wii status as far as graphics and power are concerned.
Bye bye third party support. So long current gen ports. Hello switch can't handle this and that game remarks.
While they are still selling like mad, no need to drop the price but I do agree that they should halve the price of Joy Cons as it sort of renders those of us with drift in a bit of a crap situation.
Curious how the switch will hold up against the next gen of home consoles if they want to keep the switch alive for much longer. Imo the best thing would be to introduce a new switch every 4-5 years with full backwards compatibility.
Fair enough, why panic sell when the console is performing well.
@Zeldafan79
"Yeah i can already see people gonna sell their switch to get a PS5 "
My Nintendo Switch will not going to anywhere.
Btw, not everyone who will buy PS5 are looking for OMG Ultra HD realistic graphics.
For my case, i will looking for more indies with more HD cartoonish as possible just like on PS4.
Nintendo will NOT lost 3rd party support just because PS5 have more power than PS4.
More power doesn't always equal more interesting or better games.
Still there are some Japanese 3rd party or Indie games since from 3DS and from Steam that i can depend on them even with just proper HD graphics and Auto Rotate camera.
@SuperEndriu,
The new consoles will have little effect on the Switch, it's main demographic is not interested in power...
The switch will keep on selling aslong as it has a regular stream of good first party games, but as soon as they slow down then its time to worry
So far the third party support are 80% ports so ni tend need to step up their third party support the switch last with the next gen consoles
I think the switch will be just fine because it isn't just a home console. The 3ds didn't suffer because it wasn't getting multiplat 3rd party games.
I am glad that Nintendo will continue to produce Switch for many years. I have my Nintendo Switch Lite and am very happy with it.
Give us a price drop for the Switch and the. a Switch Pro in 2020 and the money will keep coming.
The new consoles won't have as much of an impact on the Switch if we keep in mind that it's a handheld that can be played on the TV, not a full home console. The 3DS didn't last this long because it was the most powerful device on the market.
Just give me the Super Switch and I’ll be happy
I ceetainly hope the Nintendo Switch will continue to be their focus. I don't like having to buy a new console all the time. So far, the Nintendo Switch has easily satisfied all my gaming needs.
@Zeldafan79
"Yeah i can already see people gonna sell their switch to get a PS5"
No they won't, I have an XBOX One X hooked to a 4k TV. I play the switch WAY more as it has more games that currently appeal to me. Console power has nowt to do with it. And when you factor in what A PS5 will cost.... And you may need a new TV as well. I can't see the PS5 being the death of the switch.
Yeah, ‘no plans’ doesn’t always mean it won’t happen where Nintendo are concerned.
I have no idea why people think the PS5 and Scarlett will impact Switch so much. They’ve never had an issue selling handhelds in the past without the latest AAA third-party games. In fact they’ve had no problem selling the Switch without the latest AAA third-party games. By the time the new systems launch Switch will be well north of 50 million sales and have pretty much unstoppable momentum. It’s the perfect compliment to PS4 and PS5.
As nice as it would be, Switch is going to start seeming a bit long in the tooth especially as we get into the one year after launch of the 9th gen consoles. It already has some issues running 8th gen games without having to scale them back and ports of 9th gen games could be completely out of the question. I think sometime in 2022 would be a good time to launch a more powerful successor. To put it more in line with 9th gen hardware and to maybe get some better third party support down the line.
They’re treating the Switch like Apple treats it’s iOS devices. Apple isn’t going to drop the price on the iPhone 11 when you can the older model cheaper.
When Nintendo releases a new Switch, they’ll discount the old one. By new, I mean more than a battery change, like a Switch 2 or an update Nintendo clarifies as significant. The new Switch that was released was made to replace the original SKU, not change the product as a whole.
Nintendo isn’t treating this product like a traditional console. I’m sure Apple shared product strategies with Nintendo in exchange for Super Mario Run exclusivity on their App Store.
Give it a few more years, there will be a family of devices: Lite, OG, “XL” or “Pro” and TV. Mobile chipsets, or ARM based, are closing the gaps on their x86 cousins from Intel and AMD.
@electrolite77
You’re right. Plus, if developers are smart, they’ll release the older titles for it rather than the latest. Who wouldn’t want to play the Batman Arkham games on the go? Original Modern Warfare with local multiplayer? Play a game without the need of an online connection.
The Switch will be fine. By the time the PS5 and Scarlett roll out, Nintendo will have a refresh across the Switch line, plus they may try to add to the family too.
@johnvboy I dunno man, with how many games come out for this thing without being fully optimized for it before dozens of patches (Bloodstained comes to mind) I think having a little more juice in this thing would be a good idea.
Demand for Switch hasn't decreased at all, and the Switch Lite is already a budget model, so there's no reason to drop prices.
Well obviously! If you want a cheaper switch buy the lite and they are hardly going to discount the new improved battery version are they? Meanwhile in other news, water is wet and the sun is hot.
Switch is notably underpowered. It can't even run breath of the wild without chugging in places. It definitely needs a bit of a processor upgrade, like the 3ds got. I don't need Ps4 graphics, just enough to run the games Nintendo are making properly.
Glad I emulate and download all the games for this piece of sh*t at no cost.
HAHA go Yuzu Emulator already beat Links Awakening lol
Why would they cut pricing?... It has been a "lower price" launch at 299 since day 1. And now has a budget $200 "LITE" version.
The PS4 launched at $399. and has yet to release a $200 version. The Switch had a "price cut" built in.
Once PS5 hits, it will really be the "Budget Friendly" option.
Hate to say "I told you so".
@suikoden Yeah, I would've gotten the lite for $150 if bundled with a game. Can't believe used is at least $180-$190 which why bother.
Lol says it has no plans to cut prices then cuts prices for Black Friday and January Sales to compete with Xbox and PlayStation. Good one Nintendo
Just bought the switch for my sons Christmas gift.
We were tempted to wait until next year for the new PS5/Scarlett but realized they won’t be worth it at least initially. That and the 10 year gap between my kids( 11, 18 months) the switch is the best bet for us.
Hopefully they use the money they make from it to design a far superior Switch 2 perhaps with a dock that’s more for more than just providing power and connecting to the TV.
@TimmyP That's awesome, I'll have to check that out.
@Moistnado bs man switch can handle botw just fine.
@progx
Re.Apple. That’s totally how I see Nintendo going. Incremental improvements. I can’t find it but I remember them expressing interest in, and admiration of, Apple in the past.
And I agree on Switch being fine with ports of older games. Along with first-party stuff and Indies, which is pretty much what it has now and it’s selling like crazy.
@Mr_Muscle
Games (Like Bloodstained) not being fully optimised is more a problem with the developers than the hardware though
"We want to improve profitability by increasing the number of units sold and selling the Nintendo Switch family of hardware for as long as possible.”
"...selling the Nintendo Switch family of hardware for as long as possible."
This should disprove the dumb notion (which some people have) that the Switch 2 will be released in 2021 or something like that.
I don't see Nintendo dropping their prices anytime soon. Nintendo is Nintendo. I understand the idea of pricing games according to cost of development, but at some point, it becomes hard for people to justify paying almost $100 for a single game.
Personnaly, I only pay that amount for games I know I'll end up playing to death for many, many, many hours. Breath of the Wild is one of those. Recently, the Witcher III is another one of these. But as much fun some of those games are, I can't justify spending that much money on games that'll only raise my stack of played games after being played for a couple of hours only.
I still haven't bought Mario Odyssey (and unless Nintendo move it into a "classics" line, I'll probably never will). I was tempted to buy Luigi's Mansion 3, but.... $100... geez.... And let's not talk about all these other games on the Switch still selling for full price and available elsewhere for less than $20...
The Switch is the most expensive current platform to game on.
Don't get me wrong, I love my Switch. But man.... those games are costly. It's probably one of the first generation of consoles on which I'll end up skipping games altoghether. Usually, on other platforms, I often wait a bit for prices to drop slightly, but they don't on Switch (for 1st party games at least), so it means some games I want I may never end up playing.
I'm aware of the costs of development for a game. But cost of development doesn't equal value for the customer. A game could've cost 10 millions to make. If I can get through it in 4 hours, with no replayability in sight, it's not worth paying $100 for it, really.
Hope we can get the select line of games for the switch soon. Would likely help boost sales of some games as well
@electrolite77 Seems to work both ways. If Nintendo offered stronger processing power, it would be easier for devs to do their jobs, as well.
Considering the Switch's current momentum, I don't see them cutting the price for both console versions for some time.
@Ravenmaster I think they are talking permanent price drops not time limited sale periods.
@Zeldafan79
Switch release didn’t hurt the PS4, so I doubt Ps5 will have much effect, if any on Switch 😱
@Ruthless4u We have had one since launch and my kids are now 7, 10 and 13. In addition I have been gaming since the early 80's. Overall we have found the Switch has been the best fit for all. The 13 year old waining a little on video game appeal these days, loves ring fit adventure and just dance. Whilst the youngest at 7 loves Mario and most of Nintendo's franchise's. If I want to play something not suitable for them I can go off screen. It's a great alround family console.
Long as future indie titles and current gen games can still be ported to the Switch for years to come, I think it very well might last for years and years. Unless 4K became the new norm and the tech gets very outdated like the 3DS tech did eventually, I don't think they have much reason to go next gen with a Switch 2 or whatever, just your normal new models.
Heck, the DS and 3DS saw 2 Pokemon generations each. Switch is only starting on its first exclusive gen, we've got a loooooooooong way to go.
Long live the Switch, hell the 16 bit era never ended to me. I'm not bothered about Switch
Keeping up with Sony or Microsoft, as long as Nintendo want to produce amazing titles like Mario
Odyssey, Luigi's mansion, Metroid prime 4? That suits me. Yes if I want anything else I have ps4 as well.
But as far as I'm concerned Nintendo do there own thing and that's what makes them special.
@psoneboi
Why ?
No, serious question.
The ps2 was in terms of power the weakest of the 2000-2006 line up. But it is the best selling console ever.
It's a console the refused to die.
Power does not equal good games.
Just pretty games.
But above all, why would third party developers abandon a platform thats going from strength to strength and has 40-50 million users ?
Even if the NX sales drop of a cliff tomorrow, that's still a massive market for developers to want to dive in too
And with the holidays around the corner Nintendo has everything to gain.
@Mr_Muscle
If that was the case everything would be perfect on other more powerful systems, but we still get things like Borderlands 3 and Control. Reality is expectation just increases and games still get released that don’t work great whether it be down to time constraints, budget constraints or old-fashioned sloppy development.
@electrolite77 ....Ok. What’s your point? Any of the other current consoles are more powerful than the Switch, and certain games push those consoles to their limits. That doesn’t change the fact that the Switch is vastly underpowered when compared to them, and that better hardware will lead to better performance. Makes you wonder why some people constantly upgrade their PC components to the latest hardware...hm...
@frogopus So what? The Switch is underpowered and faces difficulties with performance. That’s a fact you can’t argue, so I’m not sure what your point is.
@westman98 Why would that disprove the idea of a more powerful version of the Switch coming out? Apple churns our new iterations of their hardware constantly, so what exactly is stopping Nintendo from doing the same?
What kind of news is that? Were you expecting them to announce that they are going to stop production right after Christmas and liquidate remaining inventory at fire sale prices?
@Mr_Muscle
There is a difference between a more powerful version of the current Switch and a Switch 2.
@westman98 And why are you stating the obvious?
@frogopus Aren't you arguing about things you actually have no say in? You're obviously not a developer, so you don't know if something is easier or not. That's dependent on the skill of the worker, not your opinion of the matter.
Sorry, if the Switch has a better processor and a better video card, it will run current games better. That's indisputable, so I'm not sure what you're crying about to me. The whole point of the Switch is that it's underpowered and needs a better iteration so that loading times, frame rates, etc, improve without devs having to do extra work to optimize for a minimal piece of hardware. Please stop arguing with me about these things. I'm not interested in your next opinion piece. Send it to Nintendo.
@Mr_Muscle
Power is NOT everything.
Not everyone complain about Switch power like you.
Underpower and so what ?
Switch still get a lot of support even with just their initial power.
I don't need another clones of PS4 / Xbox One machine with less appealing games library due to focusing on graphic only but neglecting the games genre diversity.
@Anti-Matter You're right and I agree with you. Power isn't everything, but I want the things that are on my Switch to run optimally. I'm tired of slow loading times and low frame rates. I want better performance. Why is that bad?
@Zeldafan79
By that logic the PC should have crushed all comers by now. Because its far more powerful then any console.
@Mr_Muscle
It isn't but that is also mostly due to developers not bothering to get the most out of the hardware available.
The ps2 is the biggest example that power is not everything.
@psoneboi
We will have to wait and see.
I was just wondering about your reasons.
@KitsuneNight I'm not sure when I'll get through to you guys, but I'm not saying power is everything. I'm saying PERFORMANCE is everything. As in, Dark Souls Remastered loads in 2 seconds on my PS4 and 15 seconds on my Switch, when warping between bonfires. That's significant. Nintendo needs to get on that if they want to keep people like me as customers. Sure, Nintendo exclusives are okay, but as I'm looking at my library I actually only have two exclusives (Link's Awakening and the excellent Mario Maker 2) AND OH LOOK LINK'S AWAKENING HAS FRAME RATE ISSUES. Hm.
You guys can apologize for Nintendo all you want, but eventually they are going to need to make something that can actually handle the games they play. Their company has had a long history of bad performance. Examples like Star Fox and Gradius 3 on the SNES, where the game chugs to 10-15 FPS is unacceptable.
My point is that the exclusives are not enough to sway my opinion of the matter, when so few of them actually interest me. It's great that I can play some of these things on a portable, but when the experience is so much better on stronger hardware, strictly from a performance standpoint, why wouldn't Nintendo want to get on that, already?
I don't care if the game is pretty. I care if it's functional. I shouldn't have to pay a guy to mod my Gradius 3 with an SA-1 chip to make it run right, and with their more modern hareware Nintendo needs to step it up.
@Mr_Muscle
Who says I am apologizing ?
I am saying that for the first time in years one of the 3 major platforms is a totally different architecture.
The wii was a supercharged Cube and the wii U was stil born
And lazy ports can't be done anymore
And if you remember the snes, you wil also remember it wil take several years for developers to come to grips with the actual hardware.
And before you accuse me of apologizing for Nintendo again.
Compare early ps1 games ( ridge racer 1 tekken 1 ) with later ps 1 games. ( ridge racer 4 Tekken 3 )
The difference is staggering
Or compare smb 1 and smb 3.
But Nintendo has never gone after power, the last times they did with the N64 and Cube they got buried.
@RiasGremory in the woods it chugs. Fact. I like the game but the switch can't render all the trees. No need to pretend this isn't the case.
@KitsuneNight I see where you are coming from, I was just getting inundated with fanboys so I misread your reply.
I'd say that SMB1 to SMB3 is pretty significant, considering the hardware they were working with. You're right that they took a few years to squeeze every last pixel out of the legacy systems, but games development was also a new endeavor. These days, people go to college and get educated about how to code and such. Back in those days, formal education on the matter was rare.
And what? N64 and Cube got buried? Cube, definitely! That system was garbage. Metroid Prime was the best thing to come out of it. But, N64 seems to hold a lot of fond memories, so I'll disagree with you on that!
@psoneboi
I am actually oddly positive about the NX, after the doldrums of the Wii and Wii U.
The first was a gimmick and the second an aborted failure.
With the NX Nintendo seems to have their heads screwed back on again.
The fact that it outsold the Cube, N64 and is on its way to overtake the Snes, well that can't be a bad thing.
Nintendo does have a very bad habit of letting their hardware wither and die on its own though.
They did it with the Cube, Wii and Wii U.
And they love gimmicks.
I personally think this time the gimmick is working
Cause i really don't play games on the TV anymore.
Just on the PC and NX.
Different strokes and all that.
But all we can do is wait and see.
"No plans" usually just means nothing's around the corner. It's the usual vague language businesses use to avoid committing to plans they're not sure about. I assume that Nintendo is getting ready for a price drop, but is either going wait for sales to go down, or make a notable hardware upgrade with the Switch, like the 3DS had with the New 3DS.
They also came out with a budget version of the console recently, so they're getting audiences who may not have as much cash and just want a portable system. Switch Lite + one fill-priced game is $40 less than a standard Switch on its own. They can lower the price in this case as well, but either way, it'll ideally have had a long shelf life so early customers don't get burned, and a better version.
Not expecting any high end games to be any easier to manage on anything less than a full-on Switch successor, they've tried that twice with the DSi and New 3DS, and neither stuck around.
"No plans" means nothing. They said they had no plans for Switch Lite up until they wanted to announce it, yet it had to have been in the pipeline for a good long time all the while as they were saying they had 'no plans' for it.
@Mr_Muscle
Eh, no biggie we are all adults right ?
And i was referring to purely sales figures the n64 sold around roughly 32 million.
The ps1 104 million.
And while its true that the industry is much more advance keep in mind that as "recent" as the ps3, it was still extremely difficult to develop for it.
( the ps3 is 13 years old ye gods.)
But most current consoles are PC's in console clothes.
@KitsuneNight Wow, it didn't dawn on me that the PS3 is that old. I'm getting old
@Mr_Muscle
Yeah it's terrifying isn't it ?
that entire generation is 14 years old now.
And nearly two gens behind already.
@KitsuneNight That's a pretty hilarious way to think about it. I've had students that started on PS3 as their FIRST console. Blows my mind. Now I'm yelling about a console that's just as powerful as that that fits in my pocket. Perspective.
@Mr_Muscle
Having a ps3 that fits in your pocket, is not a bad thing let's be honest here
And the ps2 is closing in on 20 ( march 4 ) that's even scarier.
@Duncanballs Yeah probably. The Switch has another 2 years left in its current lifespan. Nintendo always releases a new console every 5 years and we're almost up to 3.
@Moistnado thats not the switch fault try placing the blame on the developer not the system.
@Ravenmaster
Always ?
the snes was released in 1990
the n64 in 1996
the cube in 2001
the wii in 2006
the wii U in 2012
and the NX in 2017
Nintendo seems to favor 6 years.
What's scarier is that we are nearly in year 3.
I just hope that the original Switch model and Switch Lite will have Breath of the Wild 2 be playable and not just on the future Switch 2.0. Cause I'm really content with my current model
@KingBowser nintendo did say the current switch model is going to have a much longer lifespan then the past systems.
@RiasGremory but the system was made by the developer! I blame the developer! Both Zelda and Switch are made by Nintendo! Weird that you are on a site called Nintendolife without knowing much about Nintendo.
I would like Nintendo to release an official joycon with a D-pad. A simple hardware refresh that will make all the difference. Initially I wanted a GameCube and snes themed joycon. Now I realise that my expectations were too high. Never gonna get a second screen attachment for Wii U and 3ds ports either.
I'd love a switch micro, the size of a smartphone, or even a switch phone. I'd also like a joycon attachment that includes a sensor bar for the Wii. I'd like a micro dock and also a dock with added processor. Plus a way to play Wii U games using a docked switch and a switch light as the gamepad.
@Mr_Muscle
My point is that “Games (Like Bloodstained) not being fully optimised is more a problem with the developers than the hardware though”
More power is nice but doesn’t solve everything. Ask those people with mightily powerful PC rigs who still see games released ‘‘without being fully optimized for it before dozens of patches.”
@Mr_Muscle
“ My point is that the exclusives are not enough to sway my opinion of the matter, when so few of them actually interest me. It's great that I can play some of these things on a portable, but when the experience is so much better on stronger hardware, strictly from a performance standpoint, why wouldn't Nintendo want to get on that, already?”
Because the Switch entirely suits their business strategy. They can only support one machine and it has to be a handheld because that’s where the gap in the market is and that’s where they always sell the most. They’ve made a conscious decision not to sell to people who want a powerful Home system. If those people have to go elsewhere so be it, other vendors will cater for them. Nintendo have much more lucrative market sectors to chase.
@Spanjard
Trade in value has dropped for the joy cons tho!
@Mr_Muscle
Releasing a Switch Pro will extend the lifecycle of the Switch, which is what Nintendo wants to do.
Releasing the Switch 2 will cut the lifecycle of the Switch short, which is what Nintendo doesnt want to do.
I think we are in agreement, but you simply misinterpreted my original comment.
I won’t buy one until the price drops. I don’t expect that any time soon given the sales momentum they have, and that’s fine. I can wait. For me, I just don’t think the Switch is worth its current asking price, especially the price of additional Joy Cons or the Pro Controller.
It’s weird because for the 3DS and Wii U I was there from day one and loved it. But having children changes priorities! Still, when my daughters are older I fully expect us all to be huddled around a Switch in the pub playing MK8 or even MK9 by that point. I look forward to that.
I would be surprised if Nintendo doesn’t drop the price once the next gen consoles come out next year. The Switch is still riding the crest of a wave right now but come next years holiday season (known as Christmas in UK ) the current price point could be only a £100 less than the newer, much more powerful consoles so that will put people off. Nobody realistically wants to be paying a high amount for console that will be incredibly underpowered. Yes, Switch is less powerful now but it’s powerful enough to handle quality conversions when the right time and effort is put in.
It’s interesting that the reference isn’t to just the Switch but the Switch ‘family of consoles.’ This suggests that the Switch will follow the same path as the DS. We will see a more powerful Switch in the next 2 years to at least bridge the gap to the newer consoles in terms of power and possibly even other operations - Lite XL etc etc. The handheld market is something Nintendo knows better than anyone and if they keep focus on the Switch which after the disaster of the Wii U they clearly will, there is no reason why the Switch can’t do well for years and years. But it will need to be both competitively priced and will need upgrading in the next 2 years if it wants to keep riding that wave.
I totally understand why they are not dropping the price now though - whilst people are still buying it and it sells out still in certain places, no company is going to drop the price if people are still willing to pay it. Once that stops happening the process drops will. Come. In fact they will have to come.
@KitsuneNight When you put in the release months, it's closer to 5 years.
SNES - November 1990
N64 - June 1996
GCN - September 2001
Wii - December 2006
Wii U - December 2012
Switch - March 2017
So if you just went on that, likely release for the Switch's successor would be around holiday 2021/spring 2022. However if you look at the handheld side, there's a common setup to increase a system's lifespan using slightly improved revisions like the 3DS had New 3DS, Game Boy had Game Boy Color and DS had DSi.
So overall we'd likely be getting either some kind of New 3DS equivalent for the Switch around holiday 2020/spring 2021 which would take the Switch all the way to like 2024 or a Switch successor around holiday 2021/spring 2022.
@Grumblevolcano I think the Wii is a better gauge for the Switch's lifespan since the Switch will probably surpass the Wii's lifetime sales.. and plus it shouldn't see the huge dropoff in sales that the Wii had. The lifespan will be determined by when the console sales peak, which will probably be either this year or next year, I would guess. Then they'll continue to milk it for a few years after its peak.
@westman98 At this point it’s just semantics, Switch 2 or Switch with more powerful hardware. Honestly, who cares?
@psoneboi Developers make games for their customers. Switch will likely miss out on some AAA games, but for the most part, that's probably it. Until sub AAA games start selling better on the new gen than the current gen, expect the current gen to still receive support. Remember that two years into the PS4/X1's life, they only had a handful of games that couldn't be played on PS3/X360.
@GravyThief Funny that you mention children. Because I have children, the Switch's portability makes it possible for me to occasionally play while the kids are watching Thomas the train for the 50th time.
What did everyone expect they were going to say: "We're going to liquidate inventory at half off and discontinue our main product next year?"
@Zeldafan79 " the switch will be bumped down to Wii status as far as graphics and power are concerned."
I'm pretty sure that Nintendo and their investors would be amazingly, ridiculously happy if the Switch attained "Wii status."
@Spanjard If the dang things were not so expensive maybe i'd have a 2nd set, but i'd rather get another pro controller over the joycons at that price.
@RiasGremory So will we be able to play the Breath of the Wild sequel on the current Switch?
Give me N64 & GameCube backwards compatibility, themes and achievement system, and the og Wii store music and I'll be good with my switch for years.
@Grumblevolcano
Wouldn't the DS equivalent be the Lite ?
This time next year they will probably drop the price anyway to shift attention from the new consoles coming out.
Yeah that's what they said when Sales (of games) were originally suggested by their board of shareholders (or whatever they are). They said "they're already a value".. once done, now you can't stop them from suggesting and putting their own stuff on sale these days.
@frogopus I have never seen this so eloquently put. Thank you
@johnvboy But they are interested in ports. if new gen games are on only PS and XB and switch becomes excluded. 3rd party game support goes to crap. There is only so much graphics downgrading you can do to port to switch.
Hell, I'd be happy to buy a switch 2 tomorrow if I could play witcher 3 on it a lot less blurry. It's somewhat tolerable in handheld mode but docked mode? That's already an example of a port that really shouldn't have happened yet. That port already needed better hardware because the game is EXTREMELY blurry on a tv. Not every developer is going to want to do that to their game, especially when next gen comes out.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...