Playerunknown's Battlegrounds is one of the world's biggest games right now, attracting millions of players with its intense Battle Royale action. It's also exclusive to the PC and Xbox line of platforms at present, but that's going to change soon and the developers have stated that they want to bring it to as many systems as possible.
PUBG Corporation CEO Chang Han Kim is the one behind that particular comment, and many have cast doubt on whether the game could run properly on anything less powerful than an Xbox One X (a console on which PUBG doesn't exactly perform smoothly at the moment). The notion of Switch hosting the game was mocked by many, but an interesting development has occurred since then: PUBG has come to mobile devices in China.
As you might imagine, the mobile version is subject to some serious cutbacks in terms of visual complexity, but the core experience remains intact - and according to Digital Foundry, it could point the way for a potential Switch version:
The concept of a PUBG Switch port seemed highly unlikely based on the issues we've noted with the Xbox One and even X versions of the full-fat game, both of which seem to struggle with CPU-based limitations - an aspect that would only be amplified on Switch.
What we've seen of PUBG on mobile is a bit of a game-changer though and presents a route to viability for a potential Switch conversion. At the very least it demonstrates that in handheld play, graphical reductions can have a positive impact on making the gameplay work on a smaller screen - something that would be crucial for Nintendo's hardware. Secondly, while the CPUs in the likes of the Galaxy S8 and the Razer Phone are a generation or two ahead of Switch's ARM Cortex A57s (with significantly higher clocks to boot), Tencent's approach to scaling back PUBG does result in much less capable hardware managing a 100-player Battle Royale game with a performance level that is obviously higher than the Xbox One game in its most notorious trouble spots. It's not hard to believe that this approach could benefit the Switch too.
However, Digital Foundry also point out that the mobile version of PUBG has to run across a wide range of potential hardware configurations, while a Switch port would benefit from a fixed target platform - something which could lead to a superior port, albeit one that would require some additional work:
In terms of setting a graphical threshold for what a potential Switch version could deliver, this port probably isn't the best evidence. Although Nintendo's console is indeed based on a mobile chipset that has hosted the same OS, the conversion tested here has to run on an extraordinary diverse range of lower power devices, using an OS and graphics API that is notorious for under-delivering on the core hardware's potential. While aspects of the work here may prove helpful in helping to address problematic aspects such as the CPU question, Switch developers would have the advantages of targeting a fixed platform with a superb 'to the metal' development environment that has now proven itself many times over. Put simply, if PUBG does arrive on Nintendo's hardware, we should expect more than a straight port of the Android game - but from our perspective, a lot of thought would need to go into a different, more bespoke execution.
Of course, all of this is pure speculation but we already know that PUBG Corporation is mulling over its options for when Microsoft's console exclusivity period ends, and with Switch being such a hot ticket right now, it would be the perfect platform to port PUBG to. Perhaps this mobile version is simply the first step in that process?
Let us know what you think, and if you'd like some PUBG action on your Switch.
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 40
PUBG is a mess on the XBOX ONE X to the point I feel I wasted £22and jumped straight back to free Fortnite. So honestly I wouldn’t want to try running it on weaker hardware.
Sounds ridiculous, but it's not like PUBG runs well on any platform either way.
I don't think this would be a great idea. Need to look more into the mobile version a bit more. Didn't even know it was a thing.
Games poorly optimised on PC, X1 is a mess, not seen the mobile, but not strong hopes for Switch!
But I'd love to be wrong!
No thanks. The Switch has the REAL game of the year anyway.
Chances of Fortnite appearing on Switch are higher I think...
That's good to hear but after playing it on my friends Xbox this past weekend I am not sure it could ever run and look to the point that I am completely satisfied with it, now Fortnite on the other hand, that I am down for. It looks better and runs like a dream on Xbox, sure they may have to cut it down to 30fps but that is more than acceptable in my book.
I honestly just want Fortnite on Switch (and no, not because it's popular right now). Not many shooters catch my eye, but Fortnite just stuck out to me.
Would rather see Fortnite like everyone else. Least the game will have some optimisation, not whatever mess this will turn out to be.
Is it really CPU issues? I always just saw PUBG was down to lack of skilled programming and optimising. From what I've seen of the game it looks extremely basic and low quality graphically. Maybe that Panic Button needs pushing for this one.
@XenoShaun It's hard for any dev to admit their own incompetence, especially if their product was a huge success regardless (and doubly so if the company has shareholders). Only time I saw someone honest about it was with Hollow Knight Switch port's delays, even though in the past few years as a game tester I saw a lot more of it among seasoned big name studios
They can get it to work just fine if they really want. These early access type games I’d rather they work out the kinks 1st before I play it anyways. There are so many great games out that I don’t have time to be a unpaid tester for games like this.
PUBG mobile... yikes. One of the prevailing video game experiences that have "you better invest in a compatible bluetooth controller with a phone grip on top" written all over them from the start. Not to mention the battery life prospects since a smartphone usually feeds GSM, [insertnumber]G/Wi-Fi, GPS and a truckload of background apps for hours on end as well. Oh, and all the aforesaid stuff likes the taste of RAM as well. A Switch port already sounds like a more enjoyable experience as usual, even though I'm not interested in the game itself.
@Donutman The game is officially released now, not early access anymore. Not that they changed anything to make it a finished title.
Kind of like how Ark Survival Evolved "officially released". It was just the exact same early access game with all its issues but double/triple the price.
@XenoShaun But it obviously isn’t a finished game if it barley runs on the systems it’s released on.
NB4 armchair developers say; not sure if it will run on Switch...Oops, too late! Oh, and just because it doesn't run on Xbox One well, that don't mean they can't get it to run on Switch. They can always hire someone else to optimise the game, or start from scratch if they have to.
People are so desperate for a PUBG port on the Switch, that instead of waiting for a Players Unknown's response, their listening to Digital Foundry. This is why you get sued DF, but one day you will for real.
Of the limited time on spent on both Fortnite and PUBG, I by far preferred Fortnite.
Of course I would be glad if both came to the Switch.
@Callmegil what? Sued for what?
I have little hope for this they seem to be spreading themselves thin with all these versions and none of them run well. If it does come to switch prepare for a buggy mess. I think they need to focus on optimizing their code so it runs ok before porting it.
If people are right about Fortnite that does sound much more exciting.
@PipeGuy64Bit classic NDF response. "No thanks".
Yeah, as a Nintendo console owner, let's deter games from landing on the platform. Everyone always enjoyed less options.
I'll be sticking with Fornite.
From the video above, I'm having trouble understanding why exactly this game is such a fad. The gameplay looks like a proof of concept PC game from the early '00s, like Operation Flashpoint but with less gameplay and tactics....
Not a fan of PUBG especially since it can't run on anything... (Maybe obviously a PC) but it would be good to have a proper shooter on Switch. I loved Splatoon, but got tired of it (ahem, I couldn't keep up with the updates and new stuff)
Honestly I don't think most Switch owners meant Pub G when they said they wanted 3rd party support. This game is total crap.
I definitely understand the allure. I have been playing fortnight on my PS4, but the one thing I really want are vehicles, which PUBG has. The Battle Royal craze is interesting and I think the Switch would be the perfect platform. I really liked DEVIL'S THIRD'S multiplayer. Wish that was on Switch.......
PUBG is on phones?!? Wow.
It would be sad if that version is better optimized than the XBO S version
For a game with almost nothing going on in the way of visual stylization, it does hurt it a bit to scale back the graphics, as it has no strong art to fall back on.
Conversely, it's not like it matters much, as the game wasn't ever much of a looker, and nobody plays it to impress anyone with the fidelity.
PUGB would be sick for the Switch. A properly optimised version of course. It can definitely be done if they prioritise frame rate over resolution/texture quality.
It's all about the money, people. They would port this game to the Atari 2600 if there was enough of a potential ROI for it.
It would be cool to see, but it still brings up the question for in-game communication for duos and squads. I actually got to try pubg on xbox one s and i can say it wasn't horrible, but not as good as I have it on my pc where i can have better settings and frame rate.
It would be funny if a Switch version were better optimized and ended up running more smoothly than the Xbone version. Which sounds completely possible, given the mobile version.
That said, I find this game boring. I got a refund on Steam after playing a few hours. It's a neat idea but there's just way too much sitting around, hiding in a bathroom, with a gun pointed at the door.
We will see fortnite on switch way before we ever see PUBG on the switchy
@gatorboi352 Of course I want options but PUBG doesn't look very good and the fact that it was in contention for game of the year was just insulting. Also the creator of the game is kind of an idiot.
A port is perfectly possible if the market is there. It’s not about power but about potential sales. If the devs see a chance of making money they will port ANY game, no matter how demanding to ANY platform, no matter how weak. With the right tweaks anything is possible, every thing else are just excuses.
I’m of the opinion that the more games that come to Switch, the better. All genres and type of games are welcome and dearly needed.
But personally, I couldn’t care less about this game specifically. Online only multiplayer games are precisely the kind of games I’m not interested in in the least. Also requiring constant Internet connection would make the game unplayable when in portable mode, which defeats the main selling point of a Switch port... unless the game does have an offline mode (which I don’t know, since I haven’t played it)
@XenoShaun It is due to CPU issues. The Xbox One and PS4 used an AMD Jaguar 8 core CPU, which when the consoles were released, was already massively outdated (the GPU’s were alright though for the time). The PS4 Pro and One X use slightly faster versions of the same CPU’s but it’s nowhere near on par with even the cheapest CPU’s out there today (checkout DF’s Destiny 2 video to demonstrate this).
PUBG heavily relies on the CPU for a variety of factors, including the following:
Netcode to keep track of 100 players movements
Player physics across the open map
Bullet drop/travel for all players
Vehicle physics and movements
Telling the GPU to render the massive map, geometry, textures, players etc.
These factors significantly impact the Xbox One (X)’s ability to run PUBG, leaving the devs not much headroom due to how weak the CPU is in the One (X). It’s also the reason why open world games like Assassin’s Creed and Shadow of War are only 30fps (AI also puts strain on the CPU, as does alot of the above factors in these games).
The mobile version is impressive, so it does mean there is a possibility for a Switch version IF they use the mobile version as a base. It may not be worth it though.
I’m happy with the PC version myself, runs amazingly on my old PC so i’ll stick with that. I would not recommend PUBG on consoles until PUBG is at least running at a stable 30fps.
@TheMadPolarBear That was very informative. Thanks!
@XenoShaun You're welcome!
An S8 has a better processor? Wow.
@Trajan That caught my eye too. They even state it's 2 generations ahead of the Switch.
I’m playing PUBG and Fortnite on my iPhone 7plus... the graphics aren’t as good, but the games are playable and still fun. I’d play them both on Switch if I could... since the Switch version would be in between mobile and console versions
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...