As many of you likely remember, a location based multiplayer game called Pokémon Go was announced earlier this year for smart devices. The game will aim to place virtual Pokémon in the world around you, and place you in the shoes of an aspiring Pokémon Trainer. You'll be able to catch, trade, and battle Pokémon just like in the main series games, all in real time. The game is due out sometime in 2016, and GamesBeat recently sat down with John Hanke and Mike Quigley – the CEO and Chief Marketing Officer of Niantic, respectively – to talk a bit about the upcoming AR game.
In terms of how the game came about, it was driven largely by Tsunekazu Ishihara - the CEO of The Pokémon Company – and the late Satoru Iwata. Both individuals were focused on making partnerships and on expanding the usage of IP, and Niantic got involved mostly due to how Ishihara is a big fan of Ingress, a similar location based game.
Hanke: It was driven in large part by Mr. Ishihara and the Pokémon Company. They've been involved in developing all the Pokémon games through the years. They guide the IP. But a lot of what they do is through partnerships. They partnered initially with Wizards of the Coast to bring out the Pokémon card game, which has now sold something like 21 billion cards. They have animation partners who do the TV show. They're a partnering type of company. Mr. Ishihara ushered us into the halls at Nintendo.
The former CEO of Nintendo, Mr. Iwata, had his hand on the wheel. He was steering Nintendo in a new direction. Part of that was the partnership with DeNA, the mobile game company. They have new hardware in the pipeline that they've been working on. He saw the need and personally wanted to help evolve Nintendo. They resisted mobile for a long time. But it's clear their relationships with us and with DeNA that they now understand how relevant it is to the future.
Pokémon will be in certain areas according to their types and the kinds of real worlds environments that they'd logically appear in. Trading will be absolutely essential to catching 'em all, and it appears that certain Pokémon won't even appear in certain countries.
Hanke: Pokémon will live in different parts of the world depending on what type of Pokémon they are. Water Pokémon will live near the water. It may be that certain Pokémon will only exist in certain parts of the world. Very rare Pokémon may exist in very few places. But you can trade. If you live in a place with lots of water Pokémon and you come to an event — we have these Ingress events that are getting bigger and bigger. We'll have our biggest weekend ever on Saturday.
We'll have events for Pokémon as well. Those are competitive, but they can also be places to trade stuff with other players. Pokémon trading is going to be huge. You can't get all of them by yourself. If you want all of them you'll have to trade with other players. Or you have to be someone who takes time off work and travels the world for a year. There may be people who do that.
Additionally, it seems that players will be able to join teams that will battle against each other in various events. This concept wasn't elaborated on much, but it'll be largely based on the existent lore of Pokémon.
Hanke: There will be teams to join in Pokémon, more than two. Those teams will compete against one another.
For the full interview, check out the details here.
What do you think? Are you looking forward to Pokémon Go? Do you think the idea of real time asynchronous multiplayer games like this will continue to become more popular? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
[source venturebeat.com]
Comments 25
Region locking Pokemon? They batter have a GTS or something like it... Overall, it seems like it'll be fun though.
It all sounds like a good concept... in theory...
But I don't like the idea of having to travel far and wide in order to catch 'em all... I mean, what if they troll us and put Pokémon in practically unreachable or undesirable places? (like at mountain peaks, crime infested towns or gasp in public bathrooms!).
This game will either stagnate quickly, or could quite easily become one of the biggest games of our time. I can't say that I'm particularly excited about this though. With Pokémon Shuffle, Picross, and the upcoming VC releases on the way, it seems that all I play these days is Pokémon.
If this concept doesn't work out with Pokemon, it will never be successful. I think it's actually got a good chance.
As long as I can find Pikachu within reasonable driving distance. Might have to stop being a recluse too.
Going to download it for sure and I'm not even a Pokémon fan. The concept is pretty cool.
If everything is done correctly, the game is fun and the advertising is there this is going to be the biggest thing to happen to Pokémon in over a decade.
Having pokemon unavailable in some countries just seems to be frustrating. If you live in an area with lots of rare pokemon, it won't be too hard to trade for them all as long as trading online is possible. Yet, people living near common pokemon will find it really difficult to get rare ones.
I'll give this game a try, but I might not play that much if I need to know someone in a very obscure location to get some pokemon.
Just put the GTS in this...I'm pretty sure Florida will have boring Pokemon. >.>
EDIT: Oh now it posts. lol
I'm laughing at the mental image of having to travel to a remote cave somewhere to find Mewtwo...
Beeing an avid ingress player, i have great hopes for this game, since it probably will play similiar. Don't worry guys, it will probably have some sort of radius for catching and battling, so you can still reach that one pokemon inside the garden of that private mansion, without even entering the place.
mah :/
Really? You get frustrated that certain Pokemon are far? Some peeps need to travel more often. In hesitant to get this game but it sure looks v like fun
Sooo, if I live in an almost desert like area with some water and grassy feilds with some technology scattered about, will I be able to catch ground, fire, water, grass, bug, rock and steel/electric type pokemon?
So it'll likely be difficult for me to pick up a Gible. I live a few hundred miles from the nearest desert. :-/ I like traveling, but unfortunately it can be quite expensive.
I'll need to get an Android first, though. Nobody seems to love Windows phones.
My only issue is that it seems battles will just have automatic, slightly randomized outcomes.
I live right between a small forest and the sea. If I can't find some decent Pokemon I'll be disappointed. Personally hoping I can go down my local beach and get me a Lapras.
I thought there was no way they'd have the nerve to complete the real life trainer experience by locking Pokemon to certain regions and not having online trade, so you have to travel around and connect with actual people. It's so much more authentic that way. I'm way more excited for it now. It still has to have a good battle system though.
@ikki5 If you can't use a PC for sotring/trading purposes, it isn't even a Pokémon game in the spirit.
Such Internet functions should be implemented not even because they make the game more practical but simply because they are parts of the fantasy Pokémon world since the beginning.
Why not specific town locations (+ your house) to heal Pokémon as well? ^^
that means better graphics in HD looking high end smartphone such as nvidia shield or nexus google,i hope design is good,because the game not worst as i think
I feel like somebody is going to walk into oncoming traffic while playing this.
You know, I was actually really excited about this game until I read that bit about certain Pokémon "may only exist" in certain parts of the world, because here I thought Nintendo and Niantic could be smarter than that about this 1. Another thing that rather puts me off a tad is the events, because it almost sounds exactly like the big screw-over we got with the Kid Icarus: Uprising trading cards, considering not everybody can travel across the country, let alone the world. Funny that they advertised we could obtain the cards from retailers, but were they when you search availability? Nooooooooooooooo. What Nintendo neglected to mention is that they'd be available event specific.
@Ryu_Niiyama facepalm You do realize this is an Augmented Reality game, right? That means you have to be able to see the real world via a camera,and obviously they'll look around and hear suff in the real world. So what makes you think anbdy is going to walk into traffic?
I remain entirely skeptical, yet cautiously optimistic.
I hope they don't turn this into a great big waste of everybody's time.
@DaveGX Rolls eye It was a joke tough guy. Relax.
@Ryu_Niiyama Obviously not and also not funny because a lot of people are posting that on YouTube like they didn't think of the camera.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...