Topic: Coming soon is an ulgy port of an universally acclaimed game on the PS3 and 360.

Hello there. Today, I saw some horrible pictures of Modern Warfare for the Wii. Take a good look, TAKE A GOOD, HARD LOOK AT THESE ULGY AS HELL PICTURES!:

Look how horrible the game looks! Treydech is butchering one of the best games for the 360 and PS3, there is no excuse for that. Stay away from this game if you want to avoid getting robbed by Activision.

Eww, gross. But what'd you expect?

faceplam

I have no interest in this game but it looks fine. Lol.

I admit that the 1st screenshot does not look good, however the other ones don't look to bad. I won't judge till I see a gameplay video. A lot of times a wii game looks graphically bad in screenshots, but turns out pretty well in motion.

I'm more interested in how it actually plays.

Graphics have never really concerned me... but... It looks like Treyarch is getting lazy with this.

Headplam

Everything looks blocky. Not that I care about graphics, but if I did, yea, doesn't look that great. Not sure what else you'd expect though. The Wii isn't a 360.

Not a game or genre I'm interested in, but I wouldn't judge any Wii game based on a few screenshots, as they tend to look a whole lot better in motion. A screen shot viewed on a computer just overemphasizes the low resolution, creates jagged edges, etc. So, those who have interest should probably wait to see some gameplay videos before writing it off.

LOL, "ulgy."

You've just ruined my fantasies. I kept telling myself that, ever since I got one, and now you go and burst my happy bubble. You cruel, cruel person.

It's what I do.

shrugs I think it looks fine. I have seen more "ulgy" FPS games on the wii like Medal of honor vanguard. So don't make a storm in a glass of water.

I am still not interested on it.

I wasn't expecting an 360 graphic game, but what I was expecting was NOT this.

My Wii is a 360.

That's weird.

Eww.

Adam's right. The Wii has the graphical horsepower of a 5+ y.o. iBook; if it looks like the original Call of Duty and has a high framerate with decent effects then I'd say Treyarch are doing pretty well. I never ever judge a game on the basis of stills alone; you have to see it in action to have a fair opinion.

Having said that anything that smacks of a real-world war setting is a big turn-off for me, so I'm not interested in this game due to the premise; I think it's a bit early to get upset about this.

These are just stills...stills never do a game justice, period but I still have no idea what you expected. You're porting...ahhh hmmm...PORTING a game built for the 360 and PS3...not built from the ground up like, say, The Conduit...calm down...or maybe start a petition to send to Treyarch??? Maybe? Just saying...

I must be in the minority but 2 things:

1. What's so wrong with the graphics. It has smoke effects and real-time foliage. It looks just as good, if not better than WaW. Also don't say ugly without a description as why. I want to know your opinion in detail and all you did was post photos and say blah.

2. Isn't this the system where graphics hardly matter. Treyarch is trying to make the controls rival Conduit and lock the framerate at 30. Afterall they have the experience now. So please, enough with teh graphix suck. So what? So does Wii Sports.