Latest News
Nintendo And SEGA Have Yet To Reveal Another Exclusive Sonic Title
News / 38 minutes ago
Ubisoft Confident Its Titles Will Attract Gamers To Wii U
News / 1 hour ago
Nintendo Direct On 17th May - The Big Summary
Feature / 2 hours ago
Wii U Version Of Ghost Recon Online Still On Hold
News / 5 hours ago
Did Sumo Digital Just Tease A Sonic Racing And Mario Kart Crossover?
News / 9 hours ago
Latest Reviews
Star Wars Episode I: Racer (Nintendo 64)
Review / 1 hour ago
California Super Sports (DSiWare)
Review / 4 hours ago
Xevious (Wii U EShop / NES)
Review / 6 hours ago
Super Mario Bros. 2 (Wii U EShop / NES)
Review / 19 hours ago
Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D (3DS)
Review / Yesterday
User Profile

__wii-c-kid
- Joined:
- Sun 20th January, 2008
- Status:
- Inactive










#1
wii-c-kid commented on Goldeneye NOT Virtual Console Bound?:
Nintendo do not own the rights to Goldeneye or any other Bond game for that matter. Can't remember who has Bond rights right now but it sure as hell has nothing to do with Nintendo.
Additionally, just because Nintendo owned a 49% share in Rare that has bugger all to do with its ownership of any of their games where they do not explicitly relate to a character/franchise previously developed by Nintendo.
It's a bummer for sure but it's also proof of how limited the VC really is in terms of bringing in the goods. I suggest you stick to looking forward to all the good non-licensed games because they're all you're going to be getting this year - and probably next year too - with the odd exception being games of the Simpsons/TMNT related variety.