It's a bit of an odd time for Pokémon. You could argue that the series has never been bigger, what with titles such as Pokémon GO and Pokémon Masters pulling in new fans on smartphones while movies like Detective Pikachu spread the brand across the world via the media of cinema.
However, the core of the Pokémon brand – the mainline video games – has come under fire lately due to proposed changes to the Pokédex; in short, developer Game Freak is taking out a load of older monsters in Pokémon Sword & Shield so it can focus on making the game as good as possible. This had led to some fans expressing their dissatisfaction, even going as far as to accuse Game Freak of cutting corners. Of course, it doesn't help that many of the hardcore fans consider the recent Let's Go titles to be too casual and child-focused.
Pokémon producer Junichi Masuda, who has been speaking to our friends at Eurogamer along with series game director Shigeru Ohmori, says that all feedback has to be taken on board, irrespective of if it's good or bad:
Eurogamer: Has some of that negative feedback on the Pokédex - which I'm sorry to dwell on - had much of an impact on morale at Game Freak? I know you've mentioned that you're personally disappointed to not be able to include all of the Pokémon. Did the team feel saddened by the reaction at all?
Junichi Masuda: Of course, you know, you see these sort of negative comments and it does, as a developer, make you feel a bit down about certain things. But at the same time, you have to take criticism. For example with Pokémon Let's Go, early on there were a lot of comments that it was too easy, or it was kind of a bit too "kid-focused" and that sort of thing. That sort of comment is something you see, and you take on board, and really try and base improvements in the next game on the feedback you received from the last one.
So, with regards to the Pokédex issue in particular that you've mentioned, that was something that was a really hard decision internally, there were a lot of discussions about which direction we should take that in, and ultimately we felt that, for the overall game, focusing on creating the richest experience we could within that game, leaving the Pokédex as we did was the best solution overall.
Ohmori also touches upon the issue of pleasing all elements of Pokémon fandom:
Do you feel like it's quite difficult to please everyone? With things like the Pokédex issue recently, or some people wanting either a more difficult or more welcoming experience, is there a difficulty or a pressure there?
Shigeru Ohmori: Yeah there is definitely a level of pressure when you're making the game, but it doesn't make developing a game feel stressful or anything like that. At the end of the day it's something that we love doing, and is really fun to do. But we definitely really want to answer all the wishes of our fans and live up to their expectations, which is something that's quite challenging, so, in that sense yeah there's definitely a pressure. But we also, within ourselves, always strive to make the best game, and really deliver something that we're proud of and that we feel fans are going to enjoy. So yeah there's a fun and a pressure in there.
We'll be running our own video interview with the core team later today. Pokémon Sword & Shield launches on 15th November 2019.
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 100
hmmm Now this is something.
Just don't listen to thoses mean people there just born jerks.
Salty comments ahoy!
+10 points if you guys ask them if they feel like mainline Pokémon games generally would benefit from longer development cycles. I do, but I'd be curious as to their perspective on it, or rather what they'll say publicly on it.
I AM SO ANGRY
...That this game isn't coming out sooner. I'm ready!
Edit: I'm a bit of a dexit guy but got tired of digging at the game without my hands on it. Really looking forward to seeing how Pokemon Home works.
Super stoked for Sword and Shield, keep up the great work Game Freak!
Meh. Sorry to hear they felt saddened by the negativity but it's what happens when fans get disappointed.
I'm also ready to be disappointed by the third generation in a row.
@Yosher You didn't like the aloa region starters??
I’m ready to be disappointed again. It’s like a tradition to be disappointed by Pokémon at this point. I absolutely hated Gen VII, especially. I hope these are at least better than those. It’s the hand-holding and incredibly tedious story. Ditch those and just let me have some freedom to explore and train.
@Yosher
You're going to buy the games? Why? If you think you're going to be disappointed, why waste your money? That's the problem I have with "fans" complaining on the internet. People love to complain just for the sake of complaining, but they rarely ever put their money where their mouth is. If I felt that I was going to be disappointed with SnS I certainly wouldn't buy them. Either you enjoy complaining to strangers on the internet or you have a compulsive purchasing problem.
I don't blame them for changing the Pokédex because It would take an age to render all the Pokémon In 3d
They should just delay the game to includ all the Pokemon,why is it a law that every Pokemon games have to come out in November????
@Isaix Well some of the pokemon games are so long thats why also its near december and you know
@Spudtendo : You can still love something and be profoundly disappointed in it, like loved ones, for instance.
@Silly_G you got a big point there.
@Isaix
Because people buy these games every year. Apparently even though they don't like the games anymore, going by these comments.
@Elithal at the end of the day i'm starting to feel like the pokedex might indeed be limited to regional DeX in S&S but might indeed make a return in future games due to the criticism received this time around especially if it said criticism continues past the release even if the game is loved (and even moreso if not).
Oh, why can't the games be out already? I'm tired of all the "controversy" surrounding them. I understand if some are disappointed in some of the choices GF have made and you can boycott the games all you'd like. I think the games will be good. Not 10/10, but at least an 8. It's not FIFA we're talking about.
@Ludovsky Agreed there, good point. Fingers crossed that Pokemon Gun (or whatever "ultimate" entry) brings it back? Maybe adds an old region?
Sometimes I say silly things...
Fans: Pokemon needs to do something new and innovative
Also fans: If the new Pokemon games (which have new Pokemon, characters, story, region, and features) doesn't include all of the old Pokemon I'm not going to buy it (but they buy it anyway)
@Quarth You can't force them to make it come out now they have rights to even cancel the game..
@Quarth : Hey, EA did a great job on FIFA 19 Remastered.
@ShinyUmbreon LOL, it was just a dream scenario from me, just to put an end to all the negativity. I know it will be released in just a couple of weeks and I'm happy to wait.
@Silly_G GOTY 2022?
I'm ready for Sirfetch'd, Sawk, Lucario, Water type Pokemons from Pokemon Sword. 😀
@Anti-Matter Yeah, I will also go with Sword. Sirfetch'd > Galarian Ponyta.
I'm ready to be dissatisfied in some way but ultimately, I am probably going to enjoy myself.
I'm really looking forward to fighting the giant Pokémon and exploring.
@Quarth : That honour is reserved for Pokémon: Let's Go Plusle and Let's Go Minun.
@Silly_G I agree, but a videogame isn't a loved one. I'm stuck with my loved ones for the most part, but going out of my way to spend my hard earned money on a product is entirely different.
I can't control my love, but I can control my wallet.
@Yosher You didn't like X and Y! HERACY
They heard the complaints
They know about the animations
I will forgive them this time, but next time there is no excuse
@PBandSmelly Drop it dude.. I been being nice but srsly its not there fault its everyone who wants it out now use do you want to have a good game with short stuff and awful stuff.
@ShinyUmbreon
Im not saying they didnt try. I can imagine this required a lot of work. Im saying that the animations are lackluster and stiff. They saw it and know they messed up. Its gonna be super hard to re animate all those mons, but when you move from the weak 3DS to the switch, we expect something bigger. Im saying that nownthat they know about the problems, they should fix it in the next game
I'm glad they're listening to criticism. It's already too late to fix Sword and Shield, but it could pave the way for Gen 9 being the best pokemon games yet.
@HeroponRiki
Care to elaborate on what can't be fixed?
@Spudtendo Potentially controversial opinion; I don't need new and innovative ideas for Pokémon. They don't have the timescale to really break the mould like BotW did, and it forces their hand into coming up with silly gimmicks.
What I would like is expansion and refinement of ideas that have come before. I get whiplash when they do stuff like add that awesome area specific tool for hunting Pokémon in OR and then later remove it. Competitions were awesome, can we have those back? Perhaps a system by which you could have them running in tandem to gyms, so you could choose how you progress in the game and unlock new areas? Getting rid of mega evolution in favour of Z-moves was silly. Bring back megas, they had so much more potential for expanding on the designs of old Pokémon AND making them competitively viable.
And my biggest pipedream? Sack off making new Pokémon. There's plenty to be getting on with already. Maybe a new legend or a new starter, but no one needs another gen of monsters who's names I'll never remember.
That's what I'd do anyway. Probably wreck the series, but there you go 😂
@Spudtendo
What kind of comment is this lmao. As if innovating and not removing content have to be mutually exclusive? What a laugh!
Legit criticism is fine, but I feel there's a decent chunk of the Pokemon "fanbase" that'll never be happy. It's like it's more to do with Nintendo and GF being the worst companies on the planet than criticism with the games themselves..
@Yorumi Oh hai there again lol
@Silly_G You can love something and be disappointed or critical of it. But on that same token, if you are buying the games and perpetuating whatever issues you feel exist, you honestly have no room to complain. That's just crazy to me. To use a personal anecdote, there are a ton of TV shows I've grown up loving and a part of me will always have an affection for. However, I'm not about to waste my time watching them when the quality of the shows are in the gutter and the showrunners see no need to improve upon the quality.
I consider myself a huge Pokémaniac. But if I knew for a fact I'd be disappointed in Sword and Shield, I certainly would not be spending my money on them.
@Elithal Well we fortunately know we will be able to port ALL Pokemon to Home, so it's not unlikely they'll have some use eventually.
Pokémon Sword and Shield are going to be The Last Jedi of the Pokémon fandom. A giagantic group that truly likes it, but a significant chunk that will be screaming bloody murder and trying to criminally charge those responsible.
My disappointments aside, I'm ready to play this game. Of course, I want it to be good!
You know what? I would like to make a joke or a comment, but I'll be torn apart by either side!!!
Thank you GF for continuing to release what you believe will be good instead of what some fans believe would be good. If it’s not good, it’ll be reflected in sales and you can make future decisions based on that. Though honestly, people wouldn’t be pleased no matter how it turns out. You can’t please everyone. I, however, am all for these decisions and look forward to seeing what the finished product will be like.
The backslash was honestly terrible, but they also did quite the few mistakes that kept it going. I personally don't care about the dex cut, but most of the things they said around it felt like a chain of uncorrect or badly delivered informations.
A good example in the interview itself is how Masuda picked two very risky examples.
I don't think the "kid focused" aspect and the difficulty were the right feedbacks to mention as feedbacks being addressed.
The Nintendo survey about Sword and Shield emailed in April was specifically targetted to kids (literally the survey asked older fans to not reply if possible as their opinion wasn't the one they were interested in), so it's hard to imagine they are not focusing on kids this time around.
And I'm definitely worried about the difficulty after the news of the Exp Share being replaced by a default new feature forcing it.
I may be super wrong, but if these are his examples of working on feedbacks, then this just confirm the problem.
They either don't really listen or they are just very good at give the impression they aren't and that feels almost like they are having fun teasing the angry fans and making things worse.
@Gravitron Nope. X and Y started the downhill trend of Pokémon games. Every game up until then was great, but sorry to say I really did not like X and Y!
@ShinyUmbreon The Pokémon themselves are usually fine. It's the games themselves that have just turned bad. Lots of handholding, lots of lame, soulless animation, forgetful, uninteresting stories and characters. But the Pokémon themselves, I still very much love. Not as much as the older gens usually but still.
@Spudtendo I'm buying these games purely because I hope to be positively surprised still. But if these games do end up disappointing me, that'll just be a third strike for me and I won't be buying any more Pokémon games from that moment forward.
we still have almost 3 weeks left
They lied about not reusing old animations, why aren't any journalists hounding them on this? Of yeah, because you're not journalists, you're PR assets.
The most financially successful gaming company in the world is giving you trees that look like PS1 trees, pop-ins from 10 feet away, birds that fly 2 feet off the ground without flapping their wings, a "Team Loud" where its hundreds of male members all look exactly the same and its hundred of female members all look exactly the same (and often animate exactly the same on screen simultaneously). The list goes on. This is amateur hour by people making more money than you'd believe, feel free to ask for more.
@ShinyUmbreon Well they could still push it back for like half a year or an other year if they need the time.
“You have to take criticism and find a good excuse” is what I read here.
@Elithal honestly while "ultra" sword/shield remain possible... the Switch audience doesn't feel it would take as well than the 3DS crowd to just be given a refurbished version of the same game unless it were DLC.
As such, I feel it'd be more likely to see a new pair of "gen8" games in 1.5-2.5 years from now that would specifically be something like remakes of Gen4 in the way we saw the Gen3 remakes in Gen6.
The last special edition before US/UM were White2/Black2 and were not just special editions of B&W but literal sequels to it.
Meanwhile "third title" special edition feel even more unlikely if you think about the fact we haven't seen one of those ever since the days of Diamond/Pearl/Platinum(iirc the names?) during Gen4(which indeed saw remakes but considering it was the last one it may well have been because the difficulty of making new games was rising and they had to cut the concept of "third games" a-la Yellow/Emerald/Platinum of they wanted to continue making gens with two pair of games instead of just a single pair or trio).
@Isaix because of money of course. Most of the pokemon games comes out in November. Ready for the Christmas shopping list
I watched the new Digimon game trailer and couldn't help but think, wow, that's how a similar adventure game can also be?!
The story looked fresh, clearly aimed at a more mature audience.
I mean, the average video gamer is around 30 years old now.
Yet, we become 10 years old (and get treated as such) by every.
single.
Pokemon.
game.
For me, that formula seems way too tired by now.
I have never played a Digimon game in my life (while played all Pokemon mainstream games) - but I think it's time for a change.
@Ludovsky I think you're right. There would sooner be an Ultra Sword/Shield.
The impact and criticism would probably be different if Sword and Shield were classified as "spin-offs," like the Let's Go series was. The fact that these two games are the completely new and unrelenting standard for the future of the main series is what concerns fans.
@Gauchorino,
"Fans" is a very broad term, true there are the internet posting/You tube watchers who are very vocal with their complaints, but I will wager their are far more fans that will have little issue with this game, but we will have to see how they sell to gauge that.
You know, I went back and looked at the every pokemon. A lot of gen 3 and 6 were forgetable filler. Same with 4 even though there are stand outs in every gen. All of 5 are rehashes of gen 1. Some are good, but a lot are redundant. 7 actually had really unique pokemon from an moveset and ability standpoint and since it's recent I expect all of them to carry over.
Basically, if there are any cuts, I expect a lot of them will come from 5 and 6. 6 didn't introduce that many and I just looked them up and I still can't remember them. I really think most of the carry over from 6 will be the fairies and whatever breakout pokemon I'm forgetting. I'm also expecting a lot of the mythical pokemon not to make the cut, so that's around 21 right there. Which is fine because those were almost all event exclusive pokemon that no one really ever saw.
@Xansies "Basically, if there are any cuts, I expect a lot of them will come from 5 and 6."
Gen 5 currently has the largest cut of currently announced Galar Pokedex, actually.
@construx I got Cyber Sleuth on the Switch last week, it's pretty solid. The sad thing is that it's roughly graphically on par with Sword/Shield but it's actually a port of a Vita game.
Still definitely worth a look.
@King-X heads up, the dyna(giga) max moves only last three turns and arent useable outside of raids and gyms. They don't factor into the game that much. Competitively, they seem better than the god awful OP Z moves. Basically, it's worse version of mega evolutions. Which is great, because those were also OP. There was rarely a reason not to ME a dude if they could do it
@Seacliff wait, I think there's a confusion there. I mean the fewest amount of pokemon will come from 5 because they're mostly redundant. Like most gen 5 will be cut. I kinda think there are a lot of forgetable gen 3 and 4 pokemon I wouldn't miss.
I also forgot about the ultra beast. I don't expect to ever see those again. That's minus 10 right there, but, did anyone really care about these guys? Like I assume a lot of the cuts will be stuff you can't usually use in postgame or competitive anyway. So: the less popular legendaries, ultra beasts, and all the mythical a so far. That accounts for 40 cuts that I absolutely won't miss because S and S will have its own legendaries and event pokemon that'll fill the same hole these guys always do.
@Gauchorino I feel like its the more casual fans that care. I mean, a lot of pokemon are useless. Not only that, some are just repetitive. Like, do I really need most of gen 5?
Like, I'd imagine like 20 of these cuts are going to be event pokemon that no one ever really saw, 10 will be ultra beasts, which were kinda lame, and another 10 to 20 will be the less popular legendaries. That's about 50 that I'm like, whatever, about. I mean, there are a lot of filler pokemon no one remembers. Who cares if they're gone for a game?
@Yosher Eh, sun and moon had some good ideas that were completely undermined by a little tnof bad ideas and handholding. Like pokemon-wise, ignoring, how terrible the implementation of z-moves was, that every new Pokemon got its own ability and felt unique made it feel like the best generation of new Pokemon since gen 2 and 4. 5 was completely redundant and aside from some new ghosts and fairies, X and Y was mostly meh.
@Xansies i think the implicit thing about pokemon is every pokemon is someone's favorite; none are """filler""" and those otherwise useless will be made not useless by those who like them
the ultra beasts were generally regarded as the hypest part of sun and moon, as far as i know
@johnvboy
Just because a person has criticism for a game doesn't mean they aren't a fan, likewise a game can sell great but that doesn't mean that there aren't any problems with it. You have people who really dislike Dexit but are still getting the games because of some other aspect of them, while others don't even fully know/understand what Dexit is yet.
@somebread I mean, a lot are redundant and kinda filler-esque. But I agree that some people have favorites even though they isn't a particular reason gameplay wise to use them. Like spidna. Is it cute? Yeah, can it actually win a battle? Not really. I don't think it ever really showed up again to my memory. Gen 5 especially to me does seem like filler in the grand scheme of the whole Pokedex. It was created as a refresh entry so a lot of its Pokemon have direct gen 1 counterparts
I think my point is, do we really need both grimer and Trubbish? I mean, obviously Trubbish is a better design, but so many of these things are so similar that it makes sense not to include all of them from the standpoint of animating them and balancing the small differences between them. Like, I honestly don't need ratata, sentry, zigzagoon, bidoof, patrat, bunnelby, whatever gem 7s com Mon was, and wooloo. You know what I mean? It's just not necessary to have all 8 of the generationally obligated Pokemon. Kill off a few of these. I didn't even remember patrat
Lmao, i'm gonna be sitting eating caramel popcorn, looking at how this game get's burned to the ground by it's own community by boycotting it badly. It's gonna be a beautiful sight to see.
@ShinyUmbreon 🤣🤣 yeah those "mean" people sure are "mean" by spitting out facts about how awful gamefreak is to their own community..-i'm laughing too hard from your comment.
@Xansies Maractus, Trevenant, Abomasnow, Avalugg, Vespiquen, Drifblim, Garbodor, Galvantula, Gigalith, Golisopod, Heliolisk, Noctowl, Lanturn, Liepard, Mantine, Mudsdale, Seismitoad, Vanilluxe, Vikavolt, Wishiwashi, Quagsire, Toxicroak.
These are all confirmed Pokemon that are listed as NU (Never used) or lower in the competitive rankings. Including evolutions, they take up about roughly 50-60 slots alone.
Not denaying these Pokemon have fans, I personally really like Quagsire and Vikavolt, but eliminating weak Pokemon is definitely not a goal of the cut.
@Seacliff Fair enough. I'm actually glad wishiwashis in though. The school ability is a dope concept. I mean, paired with dynamaxing only raising HP, apparently, Woshiwashi should be more useable now since that was it's problem. Which is dope.
@Xansies it's not particularly like these games are aimed mainly at the competitive crowd, like more than half are just playing to collect/see pokemon; and again, people will make their faves good if they are their faves (i have a lvl 100 lotad for that exact reason)
spinda isn't really a good example...it's got a unique concept (each looks different) and it appeared in-game in every subsequent generation
the thing they seem to be doing with the com-mons recently is just giving them a regional variant if galarian zigzagoon and alolan ratata are anything to go off of
Imagine a spinoff made by cd projekt red
Really hope the gigantawank doesn't ruin it.
@Shiro28 Yeah of course,it's always about money,but this is a mistake.They'll end up losing more money if the fans lose faith in them.
@Roanark,
I never said these people are not fans, my issue is when they seem to indicate they are in the majority, when in fact they are not, I also have no issues with people complaining, it's when they try to suggest that people who are just getting on with it and enjoying the game are somehow misguided in their judgement.
@Xansies tbh I look at the gigantamax and dynamax mechanics and the fact it's tied to a specific context("must actually in an area that supports it") make me feel it was basically developed as an acknowledgment that mega-evolution and Z-move had gone overboard as a mechanic. I mean mega-evolution introduced some cool forms but also made it utterly pointless to use the regular forme almost anytime ever when you could destroy almost anything within your mega-evolution time limit(and if you couldn't you likely had larger problems in the first place).
@MidnightLaces You do realize these "facts" are based not on anything objective?
@Franklin Considering you can only use it during boss fights, I don't think it will. I mean, that's a vast improvement over the z-moves and mega evolutions even if it's conceptually much, much dumber. Hell, all the max forms do apparently is raise up by 30%. It's unclear if there's any real stat buff aside from that. That's a good thing. The gimmicks of the last two games were so OP that they did kinda ruin the game. Z-moves especially.
@Xansies
Only boss fights? Not so bad then.
The problem for me is that the notion of bigger being better does not fit Pokemon at all. Mewtwo for example isn't physically the biggest Pokemon in Red and Blue (I'm pretty sure).
It also doesn't suit the UK style region. Gigantawank would make far more sense for a game set in the US.
@BakaKnight,
What Game freak making a game focused on younger gamers, that is bought mostly by younger gamers, the mere thought of it.
@TheLightSpirit,
Which is the main issue, Game Freak are not going to cater for a small minority and risk the sales of the majority of Pokemon fans, You take most popular franchises and the mass want's more of the same with better graphics etc, it only the minority that require masses of new ideas while at the same time keeping the games true to the originals as possible, not quite sure how that works but that's what they want, now of course even these obsessives do not have the perfect idea for a pokemon game, but they are pretty sure on what they do not want.
@johnvboy I know what you mean, but I'm not the one who mentioned the "kid-focused" thing as an example of negative feedback they wanted to address and improve on.
@Forgotten_Arctic
If you didn't want people tearing into you, you shouldn't post at all. Stop being soft, make the joke
@BakaKnight,
Sorry fella, I thought you mentioned it, by the way my comment was in no way a personal go at you.
@Yosher I don't play Pokemon games, but my son does...did...he seems to believe the series gameplay wise has gone down hill. It isn't easy stringing together hit after hit. Maybe they'll return to form next game. Sounds like there's too much criticism to not.
@somebread Really? Some like raticate and vileplume? Did think the bit of let's go being childish was funny. Not like we had a game to research Pokemon like professor oak lol would be a fun brain age crossover.
@Spudtendo regarding the "dont like dont buy" mentality i think thats just the gamble with buying games. you can watch trailers, reviews or impressions, but your own thoughts could still be very different playing it yourself. some people are just tired of that gamble being a loss for them
@Franklin The weirdest part of it is that dynamaxing honestly doesn't do that much. From what anyone can tell, it's just a 30% HP increase. That makes some Pokemon that weren't great just because they were too squishy (wishiwashi) a lot better, but for some Pokemon that were walls anyway it just makes them more wall-y which can be used to stall, I guess. And it only can be used once per battle and lasts three turns.
I mean, design-wise it's pretty terrible, but mechanically it should add a lot of cool new tactics and another layer to think around. It's like mega evos, but not broken. I wish they found a better way to do it, but compared to mega evos and z-moves, it seems much, much better gameplay wise because they are by design much more situational and it frees up the item slot. I think the max forms are dope from a competitive standpoint. But they do look awful.
Well People are mad cause of stuff games were bad so there complaining more there just like little brats..
@ShinyUmbreon You know, if people don't talk and just don't buy games without saying a thing, then the developers will have to guess what's wrong with their game. Sure, some people criticize for the sake of doing it, but many just want to see the product improve so that it keeps being successful while also satisfying us.
So, how about respecting other opinions than you may not agree with iinstead of caling them names?
@Spudtendo
1.Innovating and keeping content aren't enemies.
2. Many people have stopped buying, but if you just stop buying wihout saying why, the developers have no idea of what's wrong with their product, hence why they consider criticism necessary. Also, new generations of players come, so guess what? The numbers aren't affected that much. Still, as far as I know, the first entries were the most successful and almost every new generation hasn't sold as well.
3. The explanation you gave to justify them not taking more time to include all the pokemon makes no sense because they don't release a pokemon game every year as you said, at least not new generations which are the main entries.
@Yosher dude, if you’re expecting to be disappointed, chances are you will be, regardless of the games quality.
Going into it expecting it to be disappointing, you’re going to notice the flaws more than someone going in expecting it to be good.
I'm going to buy Pokemon Shield day one just to support the developers. The whole "criticism" situation is beyond ridicilous. I absolutely don't understand how and why someone would hate this game just because it doesn't have all the Pokemon. It's like, do you not see all the cool new things they've added? How much they improved the game and made it so much bigger than it ever was? Do you not see the incredible new Pokemon?? Play the latest mainline Pokemon, Ultra Sun, and then compare it to the footage of Sword/Shield - do you really not see how much bigger and better the new game is turning out to be??? Not even mentioning that we saw only the bits of the game and there will be more and more...
Nobody is taking away the previous games and you can easily get a 3DS and play any of the DS/3DS Pokemon titles. I hope all of these selfish fans will realize that by throwing a tantrum to the developers they're only hurting their "favorite" franchise. If Sword and Shield fails, what, you think Nintendo would want to make another one? They'd focus on mobile Pokemon and make millions!
@Alpha008 Going into a game expecting disappointment doesn't mean you will be disappointed. There have been games in the past where I didn't expect all that much but ended up greatly enjoying.
Really, you could just as well say because of the expected disappointment, you might end up enjoying a game more than you would have if you've expected something amazing.
@MegaVel91 you do realize those facts that i stated, are real -right?
@MidnightLaces You haven't stated a single fact. All your response is, is a pathetic combo of "Nuhuh, I'm right, you're stupid" with a side of ad hominem, and being infantile.
Me telling you your opinion is not a fact, but entirely subjective does not make me dense. Not to mention that the NationalDex crowd are a minority of Pokemon fans, so your claims of a massive boycott incoming, are also founded in nothing.
Sounds to me like you're the only one is dense, and in addition to that, delusional.
@MidnightLaces Please tone it down with the attitude
@StableInvadeel i do apologize but please tell the others to not be rude towards me at all :/
@shaneoh Okay.
EVERYONE AT GAME FREAK IS STILL DRUNK.
Tap here to load 100 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...