@NEG A) Adam is right, surprisingly.
B) I never noticed the change in hand controlling joystick; but it's really hard to point accurately, etc. with your secondary hand.
C) The Wii Sports games seem to think it's natural as that's how they work.

S-- surprisingly?

I imagine that the number of lefties that use nunchuk in their right hand are the same number of lefties that choose a Southpaw configuration for dual-analog shooters?

I know a lefty that doesn't really like either configuration. He doesn't like using his right hand on the nunchuk, and he doesn't like using it to aim either. It might be better to just have the pointer on the nunchuk (but maybe that's too many tasks for the same hand?) for him.

hey, there is a timeline after all

“Yes there is a master timeline but its confidential document!” explains Aunuma-san. “The only people to have access to that document are myself, Mr. Miyamoto and the director of the title. We cant share it with anyone else! I have already talked to Mr. Miyamoto about this so I am comfortable in releasing this information – this title [Skyward Sword] takes place before Ocarina of Time. if I said that a certain title was ‘the first Zelda game’, then that means that we cant ever make a title that takes place before that! So for us to add titles to the series, we have to have a way of putting the titles before or after each other.” aonuma

http://www.zeldadungeon.net/2010/07/skyward-sword-before-ocar...

I was more wanting to know its place compared to Twilight Princess, and even Wind Waker, but okay

I believe Skyward Sword comes before Twilight Princess and waaaaay before The Wind Waker.

I'll come to a conclusion when I've played/seen more of Skyward Sword

one thing that really amazed me was the 1:1 sword WHILE link was walking.
I thought it would just be for combat...
just imagine......twisting a key to open a door......

I can imagine twisting a key to open a door pretty easily. Being excited about it is more difficult.

Here is a collection of quotes concerning the timeline from the makers of Zelda games.
http://www.zeldawiki.org/Timeline_Quotes

Just saw on Kotaku that Aonuma has confirmed the game as taking place before Ocarina of Time, for the one or two people who care about Zelda's pseudo-chronology.

I just wanna use the bow and arrow in that game. xD

I was hoping the crossbow would make it into this game. I don't like when spin-offs are made then cast aside without letting any of their ideas expand the main series. But archery in Resort was fun, so I can't complain.

I hope the game features less useless stuff than TP. A lot of the weapons in TP were rarely needed and redundant. There's no point to the slingshot when there's a bow especially when you get the bow so soon after. Link should have multiple attachments for his sword instead =p An upgradeable sword with up to 3 extra attachments of your choice.

Meh... Not impressed.. The series has seen a decline in quality since they released the minish cap.. dont get me wrong, I like minish cap and twilight princess.. but they just ditched key elements of the series making the games feel incomplete.. and both DS games suck balls when you compare them to their GB and GBC counterpars

I agree about the slingshot, Jebby, though wasn't it shown in the menu of the Skyward Sword demo?

Need. Zelda. Now! D:

Oh, and comment 189 made me LOL. sshhh

I don't get why people hate the art style so much. It should smooth the game out to the point where it doesn't look aged 2 years after it comes out. Look at both The Wind Waker and Twilight Princess in HD (search them up on Youtube in 1080p). Twilight Princess looks blocky, and is easy to see that it is a Gamecube game. However, The Wind Waker shines on as though it's been released as a 360 game 3 years ago.

Skyward Sword has nothing wrong with it (my only gripe is the fact that they didn't create another model) and people are over exaggerating. The reason I haven't felt amazed by Zelda for a long time is due to the fans reluctance to allow the series to grow. Ocarina changed the system to having wonderful gameplay mechanics. If Zelda fans back then had been arguing about staying with the same crap, we'd be playing nothing but 2D Zelda games. The Wind Waker evolved Zelda to a more cinematic game, with a big story, wonderful music and art style, and creativity with its items and such, that couldn't be replicated before. Then Nintendo listened to its fans, and released Twilight Princess, a game that brought nearly NOTHING to the table. Whereas Ocarina started all 3D games, Majora's Mask created characters with actual lives, The Wind Waker brought a large story and music, Twilight Princess brought NOTHING. Are you telling me you want ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE?

Mario has evolved. A LOT. Why can't Zelda do the same?

I found a few things on GoNintendo. One is a quote from Aonuma about bringing new elements to the series.
http://gonintendo.com/viewstory.php?id=131050
The really interesting part of it is when he says "This time there are larger fields and dungeons that don’t really feel like dungeons or fields..."

The other thing I found is a list of things that are supposedly going to be in the September issue of Nintendo Power regarding Skyward Sword.
http://gonintendo.com/viewstory.php?id=131227

I'm not insightful enough to catch all of these problems with the art styles of Wind Waker, Twilight Princess, and Skyward Sword that you all are. I think they all look great, as long as they keep it different each time.