Showing 1 to 6 of 6
1. Posted: Fri 22nd May 2009 18:26 BST
Which one do u think is better?
IMO I think that moh is better bc of it's 32 freindcodeless online play
2. Posted: Fri 22nd May 2009 18:33 BST
I agree. Really like MoHH2 (smooth as), were as CoD does me head in!!
Hope Modern Warfare 2 comes to wii as hinted. Sick of World War II.
But then, in theory, we'll all be playing Conduit. Mmmmmmm!
3. Posted: Fri 24th May 2013 03:56 BST
World at war has a greater gameplay than MOH in my opinion but MOH has more capacity for online players but the servers for moh:hh are canceled so yeah waw
4. Posted: Fri 24th May 2013 19:24 BST
I absolutely hated the visuals in WaW. Muddy textures that made it hard to see enemies really brought down the game for me. The gameplay was ok though.
I am not a number, I am a free man!Er, except on my 3DS - 3308-4553-9848
5. Posted: Fri 7th Jun 2013 19:27 BST
Heroes 2 is a great game. It has on rail shooter and traditional walk shooter. I like it a lot and it has online too
Me gusta jugar videojuegos. Soy de México. Sorry my english grammar. I love the Virtual Console, party and fighting games too.
Nintendo Network ID: edi_tena
6. Posted: Sat 8th Jun 2013 02:16 BST
World at War, for me. Hit detection in Heroes 2 was god awful.
Nintendo Network ID: CasuallyDressed | Twitter: CoryRocker