1LEGEND_MARIOIDTue 23rd Nov 2010 Got an 85% from ONM which seem to have bagged the first review. 85-89% is their A minus type category (in other words, rough diamond games which aren't QUITE Gold Award status). Sounds like a solid and interesting platformer in most parts. However it does have its occassional issues which to me make it read like "a high seven" out of ten rather than an 85%. It has outstanding visuals and great replay value - but platforming and the whole premise can be bland/average at times too. Mickey is a poor game character they infer, but the OTHER characters play out well in terms of essence and charm. It also has camera issues sometimes as well as paint aiming problems. I PRESUME the negatives are only occassional, hence the highish mark but its clear it isn't in the same league as Zelda and Mario to be frank. I also assume the Zelda comaprison is to do with the action RPG elements (which are mostly join the dots)?Don't get me wrong, the review makes is sound like a largely solid platformer with a "wonderful setting" and with a nice smidgen of simple RPGism in it - but it appears to be far from "epic". Edited on Wed 24th November, 2010 @ 12:56 by LEGEND_MARIOID "They say video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll."