Forums

Topic: Wind Waker HD -> Zelda U Theory

Posts 21 to 24 of 24

The_Ninja

TheLilK98 wrote:

I don't think it CAN be between OoT and WW...it was stated that there was no hero between the two, not that that hero lost...
EDIT: spelling.

Excactly.

The_Ninja

3DS Friend Code: 1891-2599-4796

Nintendo_Ninja

Interestingly enough, flooded Hyrule could fit into the timeline. The branch where the hero loses? Maybe Gannondorf sunk Hyrule after Link failed?

Nintendo ID Network: Nintendo_Ninja
Mario Maker ID: LR5-VQV-THG

LetsGoRetro

@Einherjar

WIndwaker was not the first to do this in the series. It was actually pretty much the last. That's why when they talked about it, they referred to going back to the fundamentals of the series. Up through Wind Waker, Zelda was a series that focused on exploring. It presented a world and invited you to check out every nook and cranny. As the games became more cinematic, they became more linear, until a game like Skyward Sword where it was essentially "levels", a completely sectioned off world you got to one area at a time as the story progressed. He's referring to going back to the essence of what the series was originally about. I think of Zelda U as another Zelda 1 in this way.

LetsGoRetro

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.