Nintenzo wrote:

Who's to say it won't?

DaveGX wrote:

No, you HAVEN'T done ther hiomework (either that or you've done it ioncorrectly and failed miserably) because if you HAVE, you wouldn't be sitting here telling me how I have no proof of EVERYTHING I've cited all along. Setting aside the fact that you already told us you don't like to read paragraphs, so like I said this only proves it that much further on.

WaveBoy wrote:

Did somebody say Toy Story? F*** that's a good movie.

DaveGX wrote:

Heh. No, but Mario kart Wii might as well be "almost" a direct port from the DS version.

DaveGX wrote:

I'm not saying Nintendo isn't Nintendo, but they do tend to rush a bit. How about the redesigned GameBoy Advance (SP)? The whitish light effect on the screen only makes it harder to see things, and in fact that thing is actually more breakable as to my original Nintendo DS. Somehow it came apart where the back pieces are supposed to hold it together (although it still functioned just fine), and the GameBoy Advance SP has the very same 1s, just smaller. How about the fact that the Wii itsself is only capable of running things in 480p? Why couldn't they've given it a little more time to improve on that and give it the capability to handle better? And why an infrared sensor rather than a proper camera like Sony did with the PlayStation Move controllers? You can't deny all these examples I'm giving prove that they rush things and cut corners. They simply don't know hardware like Sony is all I'm saying.

DaveGX wrote:

Lol, no i recall them saying it'd be as powerful as PlayStation 3, not 2. But yea, honestly, I see no chance of that happening mainly cause of the tablet drawpad, whatever it's gonna be called. Now, as far as the whole "laziness" thing..... Ehh, I'm 50/50 on that 1, cause if you think about it, why haven't we hardly any new IPs over the past several years? Pikmin rather failed, and the only other newest, successful 1 (that I can think of) that preceeded it, which really isn't much new anymore, would be Pokémon. The rest of all we've really seeing are classic franchises, so of course they're gonna sell cause they're what we grew up playing.

DaveGX wrote:

Well i didn't mean i was playing retro courses. I just meant I recall playing some of the very same courses with the same gameplay in Mario Kart Wii that already existed in Mario Kart DS.

DaveGX wrote:

yea, when I think new, i mean brand new, not flagship rehashes. And OK, so maybe they've come up with "a few" new 1s. But really anything that falls under the Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Donkey Kong, Kirby, etc franchises really aren't what most consider new IPs. The pattern of which they release these titles is overkill because there's so many. I'm not saying they should quit making them; They need to give us more time to breathe between releases no matter which series they decide next, or even the lack of 3rd party support other audiences would like to see possible. I think when it comes down to it this is what people complain most about as opposed to "not getting them". The only reason to complain about that is because of the announcement and release rate Nintendo gives us, it's not our fault. and really, to tel ya honestly, I have no real reason to complain about when these titles come out or why they take so long. Although I do feel I have a legitimate reason to complain about how long it's taken them to realize how many of us wanted a new Kid Icarus because they seem to feel as though not enough people wanted it, or so I've read. But that obviously wasn't the case. I've been trying to get their attention about this since maybe early-mid N64, and it never even saw the light of day for a possibly GameCube release. That alone would've been a decent enough start for me.

Kid_Crono wrote:

Since I knew you weren't going to give me a reasonable answer I went ahead and literally abused the quote feature. I quoted 95% of your posts on page 4 and some on page 5 (not like I really had to...). The reason why I did only those was because those comments of yours, are relevant to mine and would have some affect on my comments and so it would clearly indicate that I have read everyone's comments from Page 4 and up, and I know what I'm talking about.

And its quite obvious you haven't cited a single link of proof backing up your "claims." Which would mean... they are indeed opinions.

BellGoRiiing wrote:

Nothing can't defeat the SNES...nothing. >.>

SnoozerBear wrote:

If it became the 'best' console in terms of sales, and had a monopoly over console gaming...

SuperSushiLax wrote:

It won't. The Game Boy Advance SP has already been made.