Wii U Forum

Topic: THE GRINDER - Come on and publish this Nintendo!

Showing 1 to 20 of 62

AuthorMessage
Avatar

WhiteTrashGuy

1. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 20:05 GMT

I remember 3 years ago seeing some gameplay of High Voltage Software's answer to LEFT4DEAD on the Wii; THE GRINDER. Whatever happened to this game (or the overhead twin-stick shooter for XBLA)? Would anyone else like to see High Voltage Software become a Nintendo second party developer.

You havn't seen BAD BOYS 2 ???!!

AuthorMessage
Avatar

WhiteTrashGuy

2. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 20:07 GMT

HVS's Wii engines really pushed the system's capabilities I can only imagine what they could do with the Wii U.

You havn't seen BAD BOYS 2 ???!!

AuthorMessage
Avatar

SCAR392

3. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 20:11 GMT

Well, Geometry Wars did show up on Wii, so there's the dual anolog arcade type shooter for you. I saw this game to, and like alot of games, if it doesn't come out I forget about it. I really wanted to play The Conduit 1/2 as well, but never really got around to it, because of no money, and when I did have money, I forgot about it because it was old and hard to find by then. I doubt they'll release this anymore.

3DS XL FC: 4253-3737-8064
Wii U NNID: Children
Let me know if you add me.

There are games for Wii U, you know.
3DS XL is better than 3DS, IMO.
I'm all hooked up and ready to go.
Avatar pic = My most favorite T-shirt

AuthorMessage
Avatar

SteveW

4. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 20:53 GMT

Wow, I forgot all about that game, I remember wanting it back then

SteveW

AuthorMessage
Avatar

DudeSean

5. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 21:35 GMT

High Voltage Software is a licensed developer for Wii U, so I'm sure we're going to get something. The project may have turned into something else, since it's been so long since we heard anything about it.

DudeSean

Nintendo Network ID: DudeSean

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Whirlpool

6. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 22:54 GMT

I don't know. High Voltage isn't the most talented studio.

Past Names: Koops3, Klyo, Kyloctopus
I used to be "The King of Octopi" but now I'm Whirlpool!

3DS Friend Code: 4897-5952-1236 | Nintendo Network ID: Kyloctopus | Twitter: Kyloctopus

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Cross

7. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 23:28 GMT

WhiteTrashGuy wrote:

HVS's Wii engines really pushed the system's capabilities I can only imagine what they could do with the Wii U.

Yet it looked like a shiny PS2 FPS.

As for your question about being a second party developer: no. The standard quality of HVS is mediocre and that's not exactly wanted at Nintendo.

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision

Beer is not the answer. Beer is the question. YES is the answer.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

SCAR392

8. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 23:31 GMT

Kyloctopus wrote:

I don't know. High Voltage isn't the most talented studio.

I disagree. Their team created a pretty good game developing engine specifically for Wii to get the most out of the hardware. Besides Nintendo, I'd say Shinen and High Voltage are the only companies that even tried to push the Wii to the limits, and had games show for it. They MIGHT be still making this game on the Wii U instead based off the same idea, but it's been too long to know for sure. If you think High Voltage sucks, you must think every creator of shooting games suck, too, because High Voltage tried to get the hardcore shooting experience available on other consoles onto Wii in its own unique way, and even showed alot of possibilities using Wii's motion control schemes.

3DS XL FC: 4253-3737-8064
Wii U NNID: Children
Let me know if you add me.

There are games for Wii U, you know.
3DS XL is better than 3DS, IMO.
I'm all hooked up and ready to go.
Avatar pic = My most favorite T-shirt

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Cross

9. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 23:34 GMT

Please explain how High Voltage pushed Wii to its limits. Please.

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision

Beer is not the answer. Beer is the question. YES is the answer.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

CanisWolfred

10. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 23:37 GMT

SCAR392 wrote:

I really wanted to play The Conduit 1/2 as well, but never really got around to it, because of no money, and when I did have money, I forgot about it because it was old and hard to find by then. I doubt they'll release this anymore.

Where do you shop? I see it in Best Buy and Gamestop all the time. :/ Check the bargain bins.

Official Member of NL's Atlus Fan Club.
Avid Fan of Anime, JRPGs, Webcomics, and Wolves
My Den - My door is always open.

"Uruffufu" - Wolfrun
Arooo~

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Aviator

11. Posted: Fri 11th Jan 2013 23:49 GMT

CactusJackson wrote:

Please explain how High Voltage pushed Wii to its limits. Please.

I think he might be talking about the Quantum3 engine.

I think though HVS should've focused on making a good game before they focused on pushing the Wii to its limits.

I want your whiskey mouth all over my blonde south

I am an art popist. I assign art to things that are popular. I place new meaning on that which already exist.

We could belong together.

ARTPOP.

Sony Entertainment Network: naviator_9

Nintendo Network ID: Aviator9

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Whirlpool

12. Posted: Sat 12th Jan 2013 00:34 GMT

SCAR392 wrote:

Kyloctopus wrote:

I don't know. High Voltage isn't the most talented studio.

I disagree. Their team created a pretty good game developing engine specifically for Wii to get the most out of the hardware. Besides Nintendo, I'd say Shinen and High Voltage are the only companies that even tried to push the Wii to the limits, and had games show for it. They MIGHT be still making this game on the Wii U instead based off the same idea, but it's been too long to know for sure. If you think High Voltage sucks, you must think every creator of shooting games suck, too, because High Voltage tried to get the hardcore shooting experience available on other consoles onto Wii in its own unique way, and even showed alot of possibilities using Wii's motion control schemes.

I never said they sucked. I agree the Quantum 3 Engine is one of the greatest 3rd party graphics we've seen on the Wii and perhaps the 3DS as well if the Conduit does come to 3DS. I just think that they don't put a great amount of focus on their gameplay as much as their engine. After all. Gameplay > Graphics.

Edited on Sat 12th January, 2013 @ 00:38 by Whirlpool

Past Names: Koops3, Klyo, Kyloctopus
I used to be "The King of Octopi" but now I'm Whirlpool!

3DS Friend Code: 4897-5952-1236 | Nintendo Network ID: Kyloctopus | Twitter: Kyloctopus

AuthorMessage
Avatar

MadAussieBloke

13. Posted: Sat 12th Jan 2013 00:41 GMT

I thought Conduit 2 was good for some good old multiplayer action but like any COD game I didn't even check-out the single campaign. Good graphics for Wii standards and nice controls ;) weapons and the ASE were pretty cool too.

Monster Hunter Top Gunner
MadOzBloke
Hunts his prey in room: MadOzWorld

WiiU ID: obviously my NL username...
3DS: 2148 - 8905 - 5204

AuthorMessage
Avatar

SCAR392

14. Posted: Sat 12th Jan 2013 06:53 GMT

For sure. I just think High Voltage can put out anything just as good as Activision really. I don't really get why no companies were able to get their games to look as good as Nintendo, High Voltage, or Shinen when it was obvious they could have. I feel like the style of alot of games made it look next gen by using tricks to make it look better, but I feel like those companies actually tried more so. I'm surprised none of the companies used High Voltage's engine, or Shinens(not sure if they just used the standard engine from Nintendo or not).

I shop at alot of places, but I just haven't gone out and specifically looked for anything as of late. I usually just go to whatever store, and get whatever I think could be the most valuable to my entertainment setup and such(lately). I plan on getting AC3 or Tekken soon though as my new games...

3DS XL FC: 4253-3737-8064
Wii U NNID: Children
Let me know if you add me.

There are games for Wii U, you know.
3DS XL is better than 3DS, IMO.
I'm all hooked up and ready to go.
Avatar pic = My most favorite T-shirt

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Bankai

15. Posted: Sat 12th Jan 2013 11:35 GMT

HVS' last good game was Hunter the Reckoning on Xbox. Since then it just churns out pretty but generic stuff.

Digitally Downloaded - best darned game site on the web ;-)

AuthorMessage
Avatar

WhiteTrashGuy

16. Posted: Sun 13th Jan 2013 00:20 GMT

Yes, HVS' engine had some of the best lighting and particle effects on Wii. If they became a 2nd party developer then Nintendo could take them under their wing like they did with RARE and RETRO.

You havn't seen BAD BOYS 2 ???!!

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Cross

17. Posted: Sun 13th Jan 2013 23:39 GMT

Aviator wrote:

I think he might be talking about the Quantum3 engine.

I can name 20+ Wii games that look substantially more attractive than The Conduit does. I'm not saying you said anything, but it just baffles me people still think that engine looked anything but choopy and rushed.

WhiteTrashGuy wrote:

Yes, HVS' engine had some of the best lighting and particle effects on Wii. If they became a 2nd party developer then Nintendo could take them under their wing like they did with RARE and RETRO.

Except Rare and Retro weren't exactly veteran developers before their purchase. And don't let the word "veteran" fool you. HVS is definitely a mediocre developer inside and out.

SCAR392 wrote:

For sure. I just think High Voltage can put out anything just as good as Activision really.

HVS and Activision are two entirely different things. Activision is a five star publisher and HVS is an unwanted developer. I think you mean "HVS can put out anything just as good as Infinity Ward?". Even then, that's still laughable. You cannot compare any aspect of either of the franchises those developers develop. If you do, those comparisons are laughable to say the least.

I don't really get why no companies were able to get their games to look as good as Nintendo, High Voltage, or Shinen when it was obvious they could have.

Capcom, Majesco, XSeed (published a lot of good looking, quality games), Atlus, Ignition's Muramasa, and many other developers and publishers on Wii have many good titles that blow The Conduit's whatever you wanna call it, out of the water. The Quantum3 engine was outdated before it even released, people.

I'm surprised none of the companies used High Voltage's engine, or Shinens(not sure if they just used the standard engine from Nintendo or not).

Because those developers didn't want to use a choppy engine for their games? It wasn't attractive and provided no benefit for developers.

Edited on Sun 13th January, 2013 @ 23:39 by Chrono_Cross

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision

Beer is not the answer. Beer is the question. YES is the answer.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

CanisWolfred

18. Posted: Sun 13th Jan 2013 23:47 GMT

Rather than publish a Left4Dead wannaba, Nintendo should focus on getting Valve to publish a real Left4Dead for the Wii U. And other substantially better games while they're at it.

Official Member of NL's Atlus Fan Club.
Avid Fan of Anime, JRPGs, Webcomics, and Wolves
My Den - My door is always open.

"Uruffufu" - Wolfrun
Arooo~

AuthorMessage
Avatar

SCAR392

19. Posted: Mon 14th Jan 2013 01:29 GMT

CactusJackson wrote:

Aviator wrote:

I think he might be talking about the Quantum3 engine.

I can name 20+ Wii games that look substantially more attractive than The Conduit does. I'm not saying you said anything, but it just baffles me people still think that engine looked anything but choopy and rushed.

WhiteTrashGuy wrote:

Yes, HVS' engine had some of the best lighting and particle effects on Wii. If they became a 2nd party developer then Nintendo could take them under their wing like they did with RARE and RETRO.

Except Rare and Retro weren't exactly veteran developers before their purchase. And don't let the word "veteran" fool you. HVS is definitely a mediocre developer inside and out.

SCAR392 wrote:

For sure. I just think High Voltage can put out anything just as good as Activision really.

HVS and Activision are two entirely different things. Activision is a five star publisher and HVS is an unwanted developer. I think you mean "HVS can put out anything just as good as Infinity Ward?". Even then, that's still laughable. You cannot compare any aspect of either of the franchises those developers develop. If you do, those comparisons are laughable to say the least.

I don't really get why no companies were able to get their games to look as good as Nintendo, High Voltage, or Shinen when it was obvious they could have.

Capcom, Majesco, XSeed (published a lot of good looking, quality games), Atlus, Ignition's Muramasa, and many other developers and publishers on Wii have many good titles that blow The Conduit's whatever you wanna call it, out of the water. The Quantum3 engine was outdated before it even released, people.

I'm surprised none of the companies used High Voltage's engine, or Shinens(not sure if they just used the standard engine from Nintendo or not).

Because those developers didn't want to use a choppy engine for their games? It wasn't attractive and provided no benefit for developers.

It was known after year one the Wii wouldn't have 'next-gen' graphics. I honestly think if developers would have tried a little harder, they could have gotten better results, but Xbox/PS games all usually used the Unreal Engine 3, so it was a base engine that kinda just became standard. It all comes down to style I suppose, but even in that case, Infinity Ward/COD makers had nothing over Conduit in terms of style. There has been alot of good looking games, but we're talking about HVS here. I'm not making comparisons of likeliness, but rather differences.

3DS XL FC: 4253-3737-8064
Wii U NNID: Children
Let me know if you add me.

There are games for Wii U, you know.
3DS XL is better than 3DS, IMO.
I'm all hooked up and ready to go.
Avatar pic = My most favorite T-shirt

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Aviator

20. Posted: Mon 14th Jan 2013 01:30 GMT

CactusJackson wrote:

Aviator wrote:

I think he might be talking about the Quantum3 engine.

I can name 20+ Wii games that look substantially more attractive than The Conduit does. I'm not saying you said anything, but it just baffles me people still think that engine looked anything but choopy and rushed.

Don't worry, I agree on both counts.

CanisWolfred wrote:

Rather than publish a Left4Dead wannaba, Nintendo should focus on getting Valve to publish a real Left4Dead for the Wii U. And other substantially better games while they're at it.

No please, I get it, people want Valve games on their consoles.

I don't think fast paced Valve games like L4D should jump the switch to consoles. I know it made it to 360 but I bet a lot of people would struggle to find someone who perfers both the controls and the community over the PC version.

I want your whiskey mouth all over my blonde south

I am an art popist. I assign art to things that are popular. I place new meaning on that which already exist.

We could belong together.

ARTPOP.

Sony Entertainment Network: naviator_9

Nintendo Network ID: Aviator9