Wii U Forum

Topic: Super Mario Galaxy 3

Showing 81 to 100 of 202

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Crossing

81. Posted:

I knew it. :(

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision
Check out my review of Animal Crossing New Leaf over on Digitally Downloaded.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

KaiserGX

82. Posted:

I'm waiting for the Shark to pop back up... did... did we kill it?

Kachou on!

3DS Friend Code: 4296-4029-9396 | Nintendo Network ID: KaiserGX

AuthorMessage
Avatar

IAmNotWill

83. Posted:

Nintendo is not "lazy." They know for a fact that the first two games sold millions for their respective systems. Releasing more will sell more systems and make them more money. Nintendo is in a little bit of trouble with money if you didn't know. It's a smart business move.

And it's not like the New Super Mario Bros. games are bad. Both of the past games have scored high with the critics. Sure Wario Land is more creative, but Mario is the face of video games so what do you expect?

"Like candy from a babe!"
My Backloggery | Helpful Tips for Formatting Messages | NintendoLife Chat
Formerly WhoKnew, Its-Mii-Will
PSN ID: willfuture

3DS Friend Code: 0001-3392-4205

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

84. Posted:

Holy crap not only did I have to track down all the cords, I also have to reconfigure my internet settings. The things I do for you people.

And I don't care how everyone personally feels towards Wario Land. If you say, objectively, it should have sold more because of its quality you have to back that up with something other than your personal opinion.

There is someone out there that believes The Conduit is the best game ever and should have sold 500 million units. I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

85. Posted:

IAmNotWill wrote:

And it's not like the New Super Mario Bros. games are bad. Both of the past games have scored high with the critics. Sure Wario Land is more creative, but Mario is the face of video games so what do you expect?

Amen brother. Ironically I'm standing up for Mario yet still labeled a hater. lol

Even when I'm defending Nintendo's largest franchise I am accused of hating Nintendo games.

WaveBoy wrote:

I kid I kid, but really. Have you even completed the game? Let alone complete all of the objectives? Ah, Who am i kidding, that's a task only the 'Chuck Norris' of gamers can pull off)

No I haven't and I don't think that matters when I haven't even given my personal opinion of the game.. lol

The only reason I'm even going through all this effort to upload a pic is just to prove Chrono wrong. lol

Edited on by AlexSays

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

kkslider5552000

86. Posted:

AlexSays
Metascore: 32 out of 100

3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Nintendo Network ID: SliderGamer55
CorporalPegasus wrote:

All you people want sequels...how 'bout good new nintendo franchises?

AuthorMessage
Avatar

KaiserGX

87. Posted:

I miss Chocobo. :(

Kachou on!

3DS Friend Code: 4296-4029-9396 | Nintendo Network ID: KaiserGX

AuthorMessage
Avatar

komicturtle

88. Posted:

The Conduit was good for what it is. It sold decently.

"I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?"

Nope. But you might want to keep in mind it's a game on Wii, and the majority have some bias against the console. Having played The Conduit a lot, it was good. The only thing it really had going for it was the Quantum 3 engine it used. Also, the fact that HVS was ambitious with this game, so I give them some credit to putting out a quality game in their standards instead of the typical shovelware publishers push them to make.

Oh, and everyone is a critic. And their views are as subjective as anyone else.

komicturtle

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

89. Posted:

Untitled
Holy crap that was a lot of work.

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

kkslider5552000

90. Posted:

2 hours and 47 minutes.

No, that can't seriously mean what I think it means, right?

Edited on by kkslider5552000

3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Nintendo Network ID: SliderGamer55
CorporalPegasus wrote:

All you people want sequels...how 'bout good new nintendo franchises?

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

91. Posted:

kkslider5552000 wrote:

2 hours and 47 minutes.

No, that can't seriously mean what I think it means, right?

It means I played the game I wasn't criticizing.

Shocking, I know.

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

komicturtle

92. Posted:

I think that's just HIS own playtime.

komicturtle

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Crossing

93. Posted:

AlexSays wrote:

And I don't care how everyone personally feels towards Wario Land. If you say, objectively, it should have sold more because of its quality you have to back that up with something other than your personal opinion.

Maybe it's the admirable challenge, plethora of replay value and excellent score. Or maybe it's the appropriate storyline, great graphics, variety on all fronts or maybe it's Wario Land's originality as a whole that makes it stand far from the crowd and feels... fresh?

But why take it from me? If you've played it for more than ten hours, you would know this. (Picture please.)

There is someone out there that believes The Conduit is the best game ever and should have sold 500 million units. I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision
Check out my review of Animal Crossing New Leaf over on Digitally Downloaded.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Chrono_Crossing

94. Posted:

AlexSays wrote:

Untitled
Holy crap that was a lot of work.

Two hours and forty seven minutes.

So you beat the first world and are developing an opinion. How intelligent.

"Nintendo fans are all talk. Nintendo fans are vocal with their mouths, but when it’s time to open their wallets, they’ll spend that $60 on New Super Mario Bros instead." - Activision
Check out my review of Animal Crossing New Leaf over on Digitally Downloaded.

Nintendo Network ID: JosephDigital

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

95. Posted:

Chrono_Cross wrote:

Maybe it's the admirable challenge, plethora of replay value and excellent score. Or maybe it's the appropriate storyline, great graphics, variety on all fronts or maybe it's Wario Land's originality as a whole that makes it stand far from the crowd and feels... fresh?

But why take it from me? If you've played it for more than ten hours, you would know this. (Picture please.)

That's a great opinion you have

That's not an objective reason why it should sell more. And considering I'm not measuring the quality personally, I don't see why my play time matters at all.

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

Who have I talked down to? lol

I said the majority of critics liked Mario Bros. more so I don't see why it should have sold less than Wario Land.

If that's disrespecting you, you're in for a long brutal life my friend. lol

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

KaiserGX

96. Posted:

Seems everything is 2 hours.

Kachou on!

3DS Friend Code: 4296-4029-9396 | Nintendo Network ID: KaiserGX

AuthorMessage
Avatar

komicturtle

97. Posted:

He did a speed-run. Give him le benefit of a doubt.

komicturtle

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

98. Posted:

Chrono_Cross wrote:

Two hours and forty seven minutes.

So you beat the first world and are developing an opinion. How intelligent.

How many times can I say I never commented on the game's quality from my perspective? lol

I'm not sure I can reword that to fit your level of reading comprehension.

Edited on by AlexSays

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

99. Posted:

Just_Match wrote:

Seems everything is 2 hours.

Keen observation

I don't have much time for video games. So i choose to play each for two-three hours and move on to something new, so I experience more. : )

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

kkslider5552000

100. Posted:

I'm not more interested in how much money was spent to play games for a grand total of 2 hours. Assuming that's actually right that means which I'm genuinely surprised about. That just seems like a waste. Or missing the point. Or both.

I would like to apologize for assuming you were complaining about a game you never played,

Edited on by kkslider5552000

3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Nintendo Network ID: SliderGamer55
CorporalPegasus wrote:

All you people want sequels...how 'bout good new nintendo franchises?