Topic: Super Mario Galaxy 3

The Conduit was good for what it is. It sold decently.

"I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?"

Nope. But you might want to keep in mind it's a game on Wii, and the majority have some bias against the console. Having played The Conduit a lot, it was good. The only thing it really had going for it was the Quantum 3 engine it used. Also, the fact that HVS was ambitious with this game, so I give them some credit to putting out a quality game in their standards instead of the typical shovelware publishers push them to make.

Oh, and everyone is a critic. And their views are as subjective as anyone else.

Holy crap that was a lot of work.

2 hours and 47 minutes.

No, that can't seriously mean what I think it means, right?

It means I played the game I wasn't criticizing.

Shocking, I know.

I think that's just HIS own playtime.

Maybe it's the admirable challenge, plethora of replay value and excellent score. Or maybe it's the appropriate storyline, great graphics, variety on all fronts or maybe it's Wario Land's originality as a whole that makes it stand far from the crowd and feels... fresh?

But why take it from me? If you've played it for more than ten hours, you would know this. (Picture please.)

There is someone out there that believes The Conduit is the best game ever and should have sold 500 million units. I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

Two hours and forty seven minutes.

So you beat the first world and are developing an opinion. How intelligent.

That's a great opinion you have

That's not an objective reason why it should sell more. And considering I'm not measuring the quality personally, I don't see why my play time matters at all.

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

Who have I talked down to? lol

I said the majority of critics liked Mario Bros. more so I don't see why it should have sold less than Wario Land.

If that's disrespecting you, you're in for a long brutal life my friend. lol

Seems everything is 2 hours.

He did a speed-run. Give him le benefit of a doubt.

How many times can I say I never commented on the game's quality from my perspective? lol

I'm not sure I can reword that to fit your level of reading comprehension.

Keen observation

I don't have much time for video games. So i choose to play each for two-three hours and move on to something new, so I experience more. : )

I'm not more interested in how much money was spent to play games for a grand total of 2 hours. Assuming that's actually right that means which I'm genuinely surprised about. That just seems like a waste. Or missing the point. Or both.

I would like to apologize for assuming you were complaining about a game you never played,

I see what he's doing in the way he's wording things

If Alex chooses to play his games for 2 hours.. Then there is nothing we can do.. And we shouldn't care.

How about apologizing for accusing me of complaining about it... lol

I never said anything bad about the game which is why this thread is absolutely remarkable. I say I'm confused as to why the game should sell more than another game, when the other game is rated so highly, and I get persecuted by like five different people. lol

Thank you for your sincerity though

Yeah I was going to say something about that but I decided not to... Maybe he makes big bucks? That or he rents his games.

I hope I'm not one in 5 persecuting.

I persecute alone and in a special way

Maybe he makes "1st look at (insert game here)" videos for the internet. But is actually a famous movie critic in disguise as some guy who makes "1st look at (insert game here) videos for the internet.

I never said the game was good or bad. I thought there might be hope for Chrono, but I'm not sure about you. lol

Let's try this another way. Quote the post where I said WHAT I THOUGHT ABOUT THE GAME PERSONALLY.

Small words and in big letters, you got this!

Because you're basing your opinion off a number that doesn't matter. What is your opinion of the game anyhow? Just curious.

Who have I talked down to? lol

It's the way you word your replies and how you handle your discussions on this forum.

Now that it's out of the way, I feel that Wario Land should have sold millions due to its overall quality. Unfortunately no one is to blame other than Nintendo for poor advertising. Good Feel is such a great developer. (Quite a shame.)