I knew it.

I'm waiting for the Shark to pop back up... did... did we kill it?

Nintendo is not "lazy." They know for a fact that the first two games sold millions for their respective systems. Releasing more will sell more systems and make them more money. Nintendo is in a little bit of trouble with money if you didn't know. It's a smart business move.

And it's not like the New Super Mario Bros. games are bad. Both of the past games have scored high with the critics. Sure Wario Land is more creative, but Mario is the face of video games so what do you expect?

Holy crap not only did I have to track down all the cords, I also have to reconfigure my internet settings. The things I do for you people.

And I don't care how everyone personally feels towards Wario Land. If you say, objectively, it should have sold more because of its quality you have to back that up with something other than your personal opinion.

There is someone out there that believes The Conduit is the best game ever and should have sold 500 million units. I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?

Amen brother. Ironically I'm standing up for Mario yet still labeled a hater. lol

Even when I'm defending Nintendo's largest franchise I am accused of hating Nintendo games.

No I haven't and I don't think that matters when I haven't even given my personal opinion of the game.. lol

The only reason I'm even going through all this effort to upload a pic is just to prove Chrono wrong. lol

AlexSays
Metascore: 32 out of 100

I miss Chocobo.

The Conduit was good for what it is. It sold decently.

"I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?"

Nope. But you might want to keep in mind it's a game on Wii, and the majority have some bias against the console. Having played The Conduit a lot, it was good. The only thing it really had going for it was the Quantum 3 engine it used. Also, the fact that HVS was ambitious with this game, so I give them some credit to putting out a quality game in their standards instead of the typical shovelware publishers push them to make.

Oh, and everyone is a critic. And their views are as subjective as anyone else.

Holy crap that was a lot of work.

2 hours and 47 minutes.

No, that can't seriously mean what I think it means, right?

It means I played the game I wasn't criticizing.

Shocking, I know.

I think that's just HIS own playtime.

Maybe it's the admirable challenge, plethora of replay value and excellent score. Or maybe it's the appropriate storyline, great graphics, variety on all fronts or maybe it's Wario Land's originality as a whole that makes it stand far from the crowd and feels... fresh?

But why take it from me? If you've played it for more than ten hours, you would know this. (Picture please.)

There is someone out there that believes The Conduit is the best game ever and should have sold 500 million units. I'm supposed to agree with him when the game is received poorly by the large majority of critics?

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

Two hours and forty seven minutes.

So you beat the first world and are developing an opinion. How intelligent.

That's a great opinion you have

That's not an objective reason why it should sell more. And considering I'm not measuring the quality personally, I don't see why my play time matters at all.

You aren't supposed to agree with anyone. More or less, respect their opinion rather than talk down to them like you're some almighty being. (Which you're not.)

Who have I talked down to? lol

I said the majority of critics liked Mario Bros. more so I don't see why it should have sold less than Wario Land.

If that's disrespecting you, you're in for a long brutal life my friend. lol

Seems everything is 2 hours.

He did a speed-run. Give him le benefit of a doubt.

How many times can I say I never commented on the game's quality from my perspective? lol

I'm not sure I can reword that to fit your level of reading comprehension.

Keen observation

I don't have much time for video games. So i choose to play each for two-three hours and move on to something new, so I experience more. : )

I'm not more interested in how much money was spent to play games for a grand total of 2 hours. Assuming that's actually right that means which I'm genuinely surprised about. That just seems like a waste. Or missing the point. Or both.

I would like to apologize for assuming you were complaining about a game you never played,