The way I see this 3D World discussion I think the answer is pretty simple. Super Mario Galaxy was Mario's Ocarina of Time. Every game after is going to be compared to it, every game is going to fall short to some. There will always be a weird period a couple of years after launch where people complain about how it's the worst entry in the series. However at launch people loved it and five years from now people will be talking about it like it was one of best entries in the series. That's just how it goes.
Welcome to fanboyism, that can apply to any game in theory. The games are falling short because Nintendo's development habits changed, not because they reached some kind of limit.
Either that, or they're going in a different direction. 3D World, for example, seems much more like a game for casual players compared to Sunshine.
Welcome to fanboyism, that can apply to any game in theory. The games are falling short because Nintendo's development habits changed, not because they reached some kind of limit.
The whole "they're development has changed" sounds like a load of fluff to me. And you're right, the same can apply to any game or any thing that has been released after a landmark title. The fact that what I said can be applied to anything makes it more true not less.
Also I'd like to defend remakes again, I found a more compelling argument than the one I made on the previous page.
More remakes please....
I never understood this honestly. Nintendo doesn't remake games just because and they only ever really overdid it for the early 3DS days (and half of the overdone amount of remakes weren't actually Nintendo doing it anyway...).
I mean, honestly, unless Retro or the Paper Mario part of Intelligent systems or someone is instead working on a remake, I don't feel this is a bad thing as long as it doesn't become excessive. That being said, you should feel bad for Monster Games. Excitebots was clearly such a massive sales failure that now they can only port Wii games to the 3DS. Those poor guys.
Welcome to fanboyism, that can apply to any game in theory. The games are falling short because Nintendo's development habits changed, not because they reached some kind of limit.
The whole "they're development has changed" sounds like a load of fluff to me. And you're right, the same can apply to any game or any thing that has been released after a landmark title. The fact that what I said can be applied to anything makes it more true not less.
Also I'd like to defend remakes again, I found a more compelling argument than the one I made on the previous page.
More remakes please....
I never understood this honestly. Nintendo doesn't remake games just because and they only ever really overdid it for the early 3DS days (and half of the overdone amount of remakes weren't actually Nintendo doing it anyway...).
I mean, honestly, unless Retro or the Paper Mario part of Intelligent systems or someone is instead working on a remake, I don't feel this is a bad thing as long as it doesn't become excessive. That being said, you should feel bad for Monster Games. Excitebots was clearly such a massive sales failure that now they can only port Wii games to the 3DS. Those poor guys.
Yeah, Monster seems like a talented studio. It's a shame their Donkey Kong racing game never got going but it seems they also help out with Retro as well.
Forums
Topic: Should Nintendo bring out sequels more frequently???
Posts 81 to 83 of 83
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.