For some people Nintendo should focus on New Super Mario Brothers U 2 it has became obvious that Nintendo lied us about being on "par" with PS4 and XBOX ONE
How did they lie? To be on par, would require PS4 and Xbox One to be available to consumers.
You can't compare the Wii U to systems that are not out. The final(summer update) OS isn't even out yet, and until those other consoles are available for people to buy, there's no reason to assume or speculate 'lies' or failure.
Qwest
3DS Friend Code: 4253-3737-8064 | Nintendo Network ID: Children
well
1. The last game was 2007 and I have my doubts we'll see a new Prime game even if Retro makes another Metroid.
2. I genuinely buy their opinion of it being a "fire person adventure". I mean, it's so not designed to be an FPS...well until Hunters and somewhat Prime 3 where they made it more shooting focused.
I've never played a Conduit game, so I have no clue if this is a joke thread or not, but it's not a half bad idea. If it sells consoles I'm all for it.
My SD Card with the game on it is just as physical as your cartridge with the game on it.
I love Nintendo, that's why I criticize them so harshly.
I've never played a Conduit game, so I have no clue if this is a joke thread or not, but it's not a half bad idea. If it sells consoles I'm all for it.
The Conduit couldn't even sell itself. It will sell no consoles. lol
I've never played a Conduit game, so I have no clue if this is a joke thread or not, but it's not a half bad idea. If it sells consoles I'm all for it.
The Conduit couldn't even sell itself. It will sell no consoles. lol
What is it that is so different about COD to the conduit ? Yet COD sells millions. This is why nintendo 3rd party exclsives are thin, because when a dev put in effort and time to give us a quality game every one turns their noses up at it.
The Conduit is a terrible example. Call of Duty is backed up by two development teams that are enormous, littered with skilled developers, and have a wealth of resources to utilise unlike HVS. It's also released on multiple platforms, has a sleek interface, a near perfect online system, and has unprecedented accessibility and variety.
L and then R, theres your variety, also conduit 2 showed way more imagination the last 2 cod's
But at the same time pure garbage like dead island will fly off the shelves and get a sequel.
Conduit should become next Nintendo IP like Metroid. Those two games are Nintendo shooters and they need support from Nintendo.
Because using a mediocre franchise with a bad reputation is a good idea. If they want a FPS franchise they should just make a new IP. They wouldn't be able to use the Conduit's developer either, which makes making a new IP make even make sense.
The Conduit should not become a Nintendo IP when it can't even reach an aggregate review score above 70 or sell any reasonable amount of copies. Reviewers don't like it, consumers don't like it, why would Nintendo?
The series is just bad and the developers suck. That is why they have switched to developing ios games, they simply aren't good enough to make console games. Nintendo would be disgracing their name by picking these guys, ie. why this is a joke thread.
I'm gonna be honest. This game looked awesome back when it first came out. That was probably because I was a Wii only owner at the time, but it was still decent.
@Crono_Cross
Hey, they ended up figuring out the quote in your sig was false. The "Calvin Hall" story was a fluke.
Qwest
3DS Friend Code: 4253-3737-8064 | Nintendo Network ID: Children
It was a hoax. Everybody that covered that story fell for a fake Twitter account.
You are, and have been quoting a random internet troll for the past few months.
It's also not true. Ya, more people buy Mario, but Activision didn't even lose money on the Wii U version of the game at all.
Qwest
3DS Friend Code: 4253-3737-8064 | Nintendo Network ID: Children
Forums
Topic: Nintendo should fund the Conduit 3.
Posts 21 to 40 of 51
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.