Topic: I'm sorry but why does Smash have characters that are more PS than Nintendo?

Example:

Snake. It's obvious that the main series have been exclusive to PS time to time.
Ryu. Where is your street fighter 5?
Cloud? Where is your FF 7 remake and FF 15?

What's next?
Resident Evil?
Kingdom Hearts?
Master Chief?

I swear if all stars is made without a street fighter or final fantasy rep Nintendo is just plain dumb. I think smash ran out of IPs to choose from. Ryu, Snake and Cloud don't fit for a second on smash. Smash is all cute and furry characters while M rated characters should be on all stars.

Not to starts to a flame war here. I'm just following logic and these 2 characters when basically Nintendo is getting crap from these franchises. It's like here's your character but we give no game heuheuehuehuehe (Asian tone).

Honestly just by characters people can prefer playstation all stars over smash. Yeah it was not successful but 90% of here haven't played it enough. Nintendo players aren't open minded these days. Smash still has the same flaws. Nobody likes items, knock out confirms, people stealing KOs, people stealing smash balls. It's still not perfect. At least it's balance but please don't think anything it's better because it's easier a guy can prefer Isaac, Big Daddy, Kratos, Joel, Nathan over Pikachu, Link, Mario, Samus etc.

Maybe ratchet, sly, jak, toro and spike could be compared in terms of audience but just by Kratos it changed the game lol.

Multiple Street Fighter games have been on Nintendo Consoles, multiple Metal Gear Solid games have been on Nintendo Consoles, and Cloud has appeared on Nintendo Consoles in the way of those FF music games and Kingdom Hearts Chain of Memories.

As for this thread, feel free to share your thoughts on the existing Smash thread.