Topic: I'm so glad Nintendo didn't get Assassin Creed this time around.

This game has gotten such bad review but that's not the point of why I'm writing this topic

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:
http://i.imgur.com/huYDJC2.jpg So glad they didn't...

You totally right. One review from a guy you never heard of is totally solid argument. And that 30 sec clip and dat screenshot. 2/10 material right there. Did you see that screenshot from 3D World and clip? And that one bad review? The game totally sucked.

*Saves the second pic as future avatar. *

Is Exhibit 2 for real? Because that would be hilarious...

1. Isn't it Ubisoft that owns the Assassin's Creed franchise? Nintendo will never "get" that franchise.
2. FWIW, the Assasin's Creed:Unity game got great review scores in Famitsu, so some people seems to like it.
3. Do you even have a Wii U yet? If not, why is this important to you?

First & foremost this video is not a review, second I'm just showing what people are complaining about.....

Well kotaku talks very pourly about the game, and ign scores a 7.8.

That's just one reviewer, & Why the Bleep does it matter to you if I got a Wii U or Not? Please amuse me. I just posted this thread because I wanted to show what's going on in AC:Unity. Is that Ok with you or do I have to ask permission from you to post something, that I find funny?

you mean we are not getting one of the 4 completely diffrent asscreeds coming out in the next two months? meh doesn't bother me.

Any third party title would be a blessing on the Wii U right now, and we would have gotten Assassin's Creed: Rogue this year, not Unity, due to the hardware limitations.

I just wrote this because of how Ubisoft didn't want to put AC:Unity on Wii U because of next-gen. But the game is as broken as Sonic: Boom for Wii U.

"Hardware Limitations" I find that ironic. The fact that this game is so broken.

I would be glad to not get GTA5 on the WiiU because of falling through the floor too.

Recepetion has been mixed, with the biggest (non-technical/patchable) complaint being the scaled-back story and not being "new enough". I'll agree that missing out on it isn't something to be overly upset about when we have AC4, but I wouldn't say missing it is exactly a good thing, either. There are far worse games out there, and I'm sure it might've made for a decent pick up at a lower price for quite a few people, especially once bugs are ironed out.

The Xbox One version is reportedly working fine and Ubi just released a day one patch for the PS4 version. Still find it laughable that your hating on the game so hard, I understand the negativity surrounding yearly installments, but having the option, the choice, to either buy the newest Call of Duty or Assassin's Creed is a good thing.

All you post here are ramblings about games for a console you don't own. In this case, you create a thread about a game that's not even on the console you don't own. I don't see the point of creating these kind of threads in this specific forum, just because you find it funny. Personally, I think it's just spam.

And BTW, Famitsu are 4 reviews.

Played the game at a friends for hours (PS4 version) and nothing like Exhibit B happened, the game is decent and actually quite fun and running around Paris only real problem is Ubisoft being fare too ambitious with the amount on screen at once causing pop in and frame drops this would never have run on Wii U.

Edit: and why is this in the Wii U section and not other gaming?

Hardware limitations? That's the reason Unity wouldn't be made for the Wiiu, but rouge the reason that game didn't get released on the Wiiu wasn't because of hardware limitations, it was because the game would'ave sold like crap on the Wiiu.

Who knows this guy always make threads like this and then he deletes them.

I said "we would have" in the op. But yes, Rogue would have been the option due to the lesser requirements, and yes, Ubi axed any plans of that due to low projected sales.