Wii U Forum

Topic: Hyrule Warriors - 3DS port and two new characters revealed

Showing 161 to 180 of 2,345

AuthorMessage
PleaseUnderstan

PleaseUnderstan

161. Posted:

I think Nintendo needs to collaborate with Tecmo and get a new Dead Or Alive Volleyball/Resort Game and add Rosalina, Peach, Daisy, Samus, and Birdo & Toadette to the roster!!!

Posts may be more salty than Nintended!

AuthorMessage
PleaseUnderstan

PleaseUnderstan

162. Posted:

I am ok with Link being used in other games as long as they aren't on the CD-I

Posts may be more salty than Nintended!

AuthorMessage
Bessestad

Bessestad

163. Posted:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise. Such a complete dissapointment to see Nintendo actually going through with this. I have nothing against outsourcing or spin-offs, but to Koei and Omega Force? It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out. "Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens". This is not even comparable to when they gave Metroid to Team Ninja. Team Ninja is way more talented than Omega Force. This is just as bad as if Nintendo would announce.. i dont even know.. .a partnership with D3 Publisher for a series of Winx Infinity & Ben 10: Zelda Dance Party and Fitness games?

Actually no, I take that back, such projects sounds way more enjoyable than this disgraceful Dynasty Warriors skin.

Bessestad

AuthorMessage
DudeSean

DudeSean

164. Posted:

@Bessestad It may have more to do with pleasing the Japanese market than the rest of the world. Nintendo needs to boost sales everywhere, including Japan. Of course, making it a Zelda game is probably enough to convince plenty of people around the world to buy it, myself included. I think some sort of Metroid FPS spin-off might have a similar effect in the west. A lot of people here would love it and plenty of people in Japan would just disregard it.

DudeSean

Nintendo Network ID: DudeSean

AuthorMessage
Happy_Mask

Happy_Mask

165. Posted:

DudeSean wrote:

Of course, making it a Zelda game is probably enough to convince plenty of people around the world to buy it, myself included. I think some sort of Metroid FPS spin-off might have a similar effect in the west. A lot of people here would love it and plenty of people in Japan would just disregard it.

That kinda sums it up. There is power in the brand name!

[16:08] LordJumpMad Hides his gut with a griddle
[16:08] Reala: what ljm does for cash is ljm's business
[16:08] LordJumpMad: Gotta look good my my next game u_u

AuthorMessage
HappyHappyist

HappyHappyist

166. Posted:

not interested. looks like a DW clone, which i am not a fan of.

i am part of a social group interested in uniting the world by painting it blue.
Blue blue.

AuthorMessage
Bessestad

Bessestad

167. Posted:

DudeSean wrote:

@Bessestad It may have more to do with pleasing the Japanese market than the rest of the world. Nintendo needs to boost sales everywhere, including Japan. Of course, making it a Zelda game is probably enough to convince plenty of people around the world to buy it, myself included. I think some sort of Metroid FPS spin-off might have a similar effect in the west. A lot of people here would love it and plenty of people in Japan would just disregard it.

Well, of course it is a marketing decision. It certainly isnt related to anything else. But thats not really an excuse. What makes it even more odd is that Zelda isnt really all that in Japan - so it problably would have been the same to just finance a exclusive Dynasty Warriors-game in itself.

Bessestad

AuthorMessage
kkslider5552000

kkslider5552000

168. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise. Such a complete dissapointment to see Nintendo actually going through with this. I have nothing against outsourcing or spin-offs, but to Koei and Omega Force? It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out. "Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens". This is not even comparable to when they gave Metroid to Team Ninja. Team Ninja is way more talented than Omega Force. This is just as bad as if Nintendo would announce.. i dont even know.. .a partnership with D3 Publisher for a series of Winx Infinity & Ben 10: Zelda Dance Party and Fitness games?

Actually no, I take that back, such projects sounds way more enjoyable than this disgraceful Dynasty Warriors skin.

you're just mad it's gonna sell at least 10X better than Wonderful 101

3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Nintendo Network ID: SliderGamer55

Let's Play MegaMan 64 (now with a playlist)!

AuthorMessage
Rezalack

Rezalack

169. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise. Such a complete dissapointment to see Nintendo actually going through with this. I have nothing against outsourcing or spin-offs, but to Koei and Omega Force? It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out. "Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens". This is not even comparable to when they gave Metroid to Team Ninja. Team Ninja is way more talented than Omega Force. This is just as bad as if Nintendo would announce.. i dont even know.. .a partnership with D3 Publisher for a series of Winx Infinity & Ben 10: Zelda Dance Party and Fitness games?

Actually no, I take that back, such projects sounds way more enjoyable than this disgraceful Dynasty Warriors skin.

I think you're being a little harsh. It sounds as if your opinion of the series has already decimated any chance that this game could possibly be good. Is that the case? Do you think this game is already a lost cause? Saying it has HD N64 Graphics is probably one of the worst assessments that could be made out of the whole trailer. They're not that bad. Not great, but not bad. Even if Nintendo was just looking for a quick way to get a some Wii U Zelda content out.. I don't think that's a bad idea. If the game was released as it looks now, (obviously far from complete), it'd be a disappointment.. but give it a chance to grow. It could be something worthwhile. I'd like to believe that Nintendo won't allow them to release complete tripe..

Keep in mind, I've never played any Dynasty Warrior games. I'm just going by what I saw in the trailer. I think it has a good amount of potential. Tecmo has released some of my favorite games during the PS era. Personally I hope it turns out really successful and further solidifies Nintendos relationship with Tecmo for future releases / collaborations of past franchises.

Rezalack

Nintendo Network ID: Spuratis

AuthorMessage
Happy_Mask

Happy_Mask

170. Posted:

kkslider5552000 wrote:

Bessestad wrote:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise. Such a complete dissapointment to see Nintendo actually going through with this. I have nothing against outsourcing or spin-offs, but to Koei and Omega Force? It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out. "Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens". This is not even comparable to when they gave Metroid to Team Ninja. Team Ninja is way more talented than Omega Force. This is just as bad as if Nintendo would announce.. i dont even know.. .a partnership with D3 Publisher for a series of Winx Infinity & Ben 10: Zelda Dance Party and Fitness games?

Actually no, I take that back, such projects sounds way more enjoyable than this disgraceful Dynasty Warriors skin.

you're just mad it's gonna sell at least 10X better than Wonderful 101

It's true. It's really, really sad that 101 did that bad, but I'd be shocked if this only sold 10X better.

[16:08] LordJumpMad Hides his gut with a griddle
[16:08] Reala: what ljm does for cash is ljm's business
[16:08] LordJumpMad: Gotta look good my my next game u_u

AuthorMessage
Bessestad

Bessestad

171. Posted:

Spuratis wrote:

Bessestad wrote:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise. Such a complete dissapointment to see Nintendo actually going through with this. I have nothing against outsourcing or spin-offs, but to Koei and Omega Force? It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out. "Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens". This is not even comparable to when they gave Metroid to Team Ninja. Team Ninja is way more talented than Omega Force. This is just as bad as if Nintendo would announce.. i dont even know.. .a partnership with D3 Publisher for a series of Winx Infinity & Ben 10: Zelda Dance Party and Fitness games?

Actually no, I take that back, such projects sounds way more enjoyable than this disgraceful Dynasty Warriors skin.

I think you're being a little harsh. It sounds as if your opinion of the series has already decimated any chance that this game could possibly be good. Is that the case? Do you think this game is already a lost cause? Saying it has HD N64 Graphics is probably one of the worst assessments that could be made out of the whole trailer. They're not that bad. Not great, but not bad. Even if Nintendo was just looking for a quick way to get a some Wii U Zelda content out.. I don't think that's a bad idea. If the game was released as it looks now, (obviously far from complete), it'd be a disappointment.. but give it a chance to grow. It could be something worthwhile. I'd like to believe that Nintendo won't allow them to release complete tripe..

Keep in mind, I've never played any Dynasty Warrior games. I'm just going by what I saw in the trailer. I think it has a good amount of potential. Tecmo has released some of my favorite games during the PS era. Personally I hope it turns out really successful and further solidifies Nintendos relationship with Tecmo for future releases / collaborations of past franchises.

This seems to be the trend for the "Yes"-sayers in this case. It makes it somewhat easy to make the assumtion that you see your hopes rather then the actual reality of the series. I would suggest that you picked a DW game up and try it out - but that still wouldnt give a fair view of what it is. You gotta have been with the tides to know that Dynasty Warriors (and its spin-offs) is what it is, they doesnt really evolve into something else. They are what they are.

Not saying that they cant be somewhat fun, as one can find some entertainment value in most titles. Even doggypoodleoopsily ones. But its no place for Zelda. Zelda is IMPORTANT. Thats where the disapointment lies. I wouldnt mind Nintendo putting their money on producing a non Zelda-skinned crap-game for Wii U. But you gotta respect your brands. This is just the CD-i scandal all over again - But at least those Phillips titles where original and not as simple as a texture change.

Watch the language -Lz

Edited on by LztheQuack

Bessestad

AuthorMessage
DudeSean

DudeSean

172. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

DudeSean wrote:

@Bessestad It may have more to do with pleasing the Japanese market than the rest of the world. Nintendo needs to boost sales everywhere, including Japan. Of course, making it a Zelda game is probably enough to convince plenty of people around the world to buy it, myself included. I think some sort of Metroid FPS spin-off might have a similar effect in the west. A lot of people here would love it and plenty of people in Japan would just disregard it.

Well, of course it is a marketing decision. It certainly isnt related to anything else. But thats not really an excuse. What makes it even more odd is that Zelda isnt really all that in Japan - so it problably would have been the same to just finance a exclusive Dynasty Warriors-game in itself.

Nintendo exclusives usually don't stay exclusive for long. Putting Zelda in it ensures it's permanently exclusive.

DudeSean

Nintendo Network ID: DudeSean

AuthorMessage
Bessestad

Bessestad

173. Posted:

DudeSean wrote:

Bessestad wrote:

DudeSean wrote:

@Bessestad It may have more to do with pleasing the Japanese market than the rest of the world. Nintendo needs to boost sales everywhere, including Japan. Of course, making it a Zelda game is probably enough to convince plenty of people around the world to buy it, myself included. I think some sort of Metroid FPS spin-off might have a similar effect in the west. A lot of people here would love it and plenty of people in Japan would just disregard it.

Well, of course it is a marketing decision. It certainly isnt related to anything else. But thats not really an excuse. What makes it even more odd is that Zelda isnt really all that in Japan - so it problably would have been the same to just finance a exclusive Dynasty Warriors-game in itself.

Nintendo exclusives usually don't stay exclusive for long. Putting Zelda in it ensures it's permanently exclusive.

Well, that of course depends on the deal in itself.

They could have contracted it (such as with Resident Evil Remake and Resident Evil Zero), or made it into a co-production (such as with Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles and Pac Man Vs) or.. if Nintendo branding had to be involved.. those Super Mario-figurines worked pretty well in the Metal Gear Solid remake for Gamecube. It stayed exclusive despite not being a full-fledged Super Mario Bros and MGS crossover, haha.

Well, the reality is what it is. Cant do much about that. Unfortunately.

Bessestad

AuthorMessage
OptometristLime

OptometristLime

174. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens".

So jagged edges, bad textures, minimal lighting - you observed all of these symptoms by watching the trailer?
Let me guess, you must have special eyes!
Untitled

You are what you eat from your head to your feet.

AuthorMessage
Rezalack

Rezalack

175. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

This seems to be the trend for the "Yes"-sayers in this case. It makes it somewhat easy to make the assumtion that you see your hopes rather then the actual reality of the series. I would suggest that you picked a DW game up and try it out - but that still wouldnt give a fair view of what it is. You gotta have been with the tides to know that Dynasty Warriors (and its spin-offs) is what it is, they doesnt really evolve into something else. They are what they are.

Not saying that they cant be somewhat fun, as one can find some entertainment value in most titles. Even doggeypoodleoopsily ones. But its no place for Zelda. Zelda is IMPORTANT. Thats where the disapointment lies. I wouldnt mind Nintendo putting their money on producing a non Zelda-skinned crap-game for Wii U. But you gotta respect your brands. This is just the CD-i scandal all over again - But at least those Phillips titles where original and not as simple as a texture change.

There's a reason I have never played Dynasty Warrior games, that's because they've always looked boring and shallow to me. When I saw the trailer in the Nintendo Direct I was just instantly on board for some reason. That being said, I expect nothing but a hack n' slash Zelda from this game. Not expecting any other Zelda elements other than a story, which I'd expect to be something from Nintendos hand in the production. I'm not really a "Yes"-sayer as I was one that was really disappointed with the announcement of Super Mario 3D World, which is one of my favorite games this year. Maybe I just learned from that experience, heh. I'm a "Hope for the best, expect the worst." kind of person. That's definitely the case here, despite that I already like what I see.

And @kkslider5552000 That unfortunately, will probably be very, very true. W101 is my GOTY and isn't nearly as popular as it should be.

Edited on by LztheQuack

Rezalack

Nintendo Network ID: Spuratis

AuthorMessage
CaviarMeths

CaviarMeths

176. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

It just seems like Nintendo was looking for the fastest and cheapest way to get some Zelda-content out.

This sentence is dumb. You should consider inventing a time machine and going back in time to prevent yourself from typing it.

I am your poorly translated JRPG.

AuthorMessage
Bessestad

Bessestad

177. Posted:

OptometristLime wrote:

Bessestad wrote:

Hey, lets just throw a Zelda-skin on a completely meaningless and unrelated franchise that still have graphics like a HD-remastered Nintendo 64 game and lets see what happens".

So jagged edges, bad textures, minimal lighting - you observed all of these symptoms by watching the trailer?
Let me guess, you must have special eyes!
Untitled

By watching the trailer (you say it as if they didnt show gameplay? They only showed gameplay. And lots of it) and the fact that i actually have played these games. I do not speculate. I also didnt say it looked like a N64-game. But the graphics definetely made me think about the new versions of Perfect Dark and Ocarina of Time that have arrived as of later years. In terms of detail.

Edit: You know, all of these games looks bad. Its nothing controversial about it. Im pretty sure they are even still using the same engine that they used for the PS2-games in the series (No, it was not impressive back then either). But even compared to the likes of WO3 and DW8 this looked especially bad. Gotta say.

Edited on by Bessestad

Bessestad

AuthorMessage
Arminillo

Arminillo

178. Posted:

My first dynasty warriors was the 3DS launch title Samurai Warriors (Same thing right? idk), and I really liked it. Also, I think Nintendo will watch this title to stop it from being bad and I think people will be surprised by the end result.

3DS name: Arminillo
3DS FC: 1118-0310-8459

"The Rich Boy wakes Up, But is Handsome."
-DeviousSnorlax

Nintendo Network ID: Arminillo

AuthorMessage
Emblem

Emblem

179. Posted:

Bessestad wrote:

Dynasty Warriors is such as crappy shovelware franchise.

Really Shovelware? Do you even know what that means? The Warriors series are some of the only pure non versus beat em ups left. The latest games have all been great (Gundam3, DW8, WO3 & FOTNS2). Fair enough you may not like them but calling them shovelware is just nonsense.

You don't own Zelda, Nintendo do and you can be sure they didn't make this decision lightly. Its highly likely that whoever greenlighted the project also plays and enjoys the warriors series as well. It could be a bad game or a good game but we will never know if they don't try it.

From a business point of very this game is a perfect idea, if its bad or good people are going to be more excited for 2015 Zelda.

Emblem

AuthorMessage
RR529

RR529

180. Posted:

Suicune wrote:

My first dynasty warriors was the 3DS launch title Samurai Warriors (Same thing right? idk), and I really liked it. Also, I think Nintendo will watch this title to stop it from being bad and I think people will be surprised by the end result.

Yeah, I've played Samurai Warriors 2 & Samurai Warriors: Chronicles, and while they're not particularly deep or anything, they are really fun.

As for the whatever tedium there was in SW2, I felt SW:C fixed it with the ability to switch between your 4 officers at will (this also cut down on backtracking through parts of the field you've already completed, since you could just switch to the character closest to your objective).

With the Gamepad, I'm sure they'll implement a similar character swapping feature, and the infusion of Zelda lore & characters is sure to make it more fun for us Nintendo fans.

Avatar: Deborah (DQV)

Reading: Bleach, Ikkitosen, Kyokai no Rinne

Watching: America: the Story of Us, Dragon Ball Super, DBZ Kai, Kyokai no Rinne, Michiko & Hatchin, SAO II