WaltzElf wrote:
I'm not saying anyone has to like subscription models. I am saying that the theory that they're "no good/ don't provide value for money" is factually incorrect. Unless you consider your opinion superior to a few million people.
Mickeymac wrote:
I personally don't believe in paying for subscriptions in any form.
Adam wrote:
I hate subscriptions, too.
I don't believe either Mickeymac, to whom I was most directly responding, or I said anything to the contrary. Not liking something isn't the same as saying it is generally worthless. I was just sharing a multi-paragraph high-five with a like-minded individual.
I'm well aware of the bazillions of Warcraft players and their different opinion. Obviously if someone buys anything he sees the value in it — no need for any more detail than that if that is the argument. But yes, I do consider my opinion superior to a few million people, though I wasn't factoring that into my post.
I also don't see any relevance into if you can do WoW for 44cents per hour or whatever, it's still buying a full price product, then paying so it keeps working, and in time they'll get bored of it for WoW2 and then you're just stuck with a useless disc eventually. As ADAM put it, he can do 100s of hours on Smash and get plenty of value, and better yet if he gets a nostalgic trip in a decade he can do a 100 more, can't say that is a sure bet for WoW.