Wii Virtual Console Forum

Topic: Would you prefer bad games being released instead of getting zero games?

Showing 21 to 24 of 24

AuthorMessage
Avatar

CrazyOtto

21. Posted:

I'd take bad games over no games, unless the game is "Super Pitfall"

Rest in Peace ShiftyLook
I keep these Nintendo Life threads updated: Missing 3DS VC and Wii U VC between regions, Full of list first party Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and Game Gear games missing from the 3DS VC, and Full of list first party Game Boy Advance games missing from the Wii U VC.

3DS Friend Code: 4511-0465-7453 | Nintendo Network ID: MrSRArter

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Bass_X0

22. Posted:

LordJumpMad wrote:

Bad games are the same as getting no game.
Would you get a bad game?

You miss the point.

I'll use a timeline thing.

[Three months without games] -> [Bad game] -> [Bad game] -> [Bad game] -> [Good game] -> [Bad game] -> [Bad game] -> [Bad game] -> [Good game]

OR

[Three months of bad games] -> [Good game] -> [Good game] -> [Good game]

When do you want those bad games to be released? And you can't say not at all.

Edited on by Bass_X0

Edgey, Gumshoe, Godot, Sissel, Larry, then Mia, Franziska, Maggie, Kay and Lynne.

I'm throwing my money at the screen but nothing happens!

AuthorMessage
Avatar

citizenerased

23. Posted:

No games. That way the good games would get the sales/attention they deserve, which sadly enough right now they don't.

EDIT: I thought this was the general game forum. Oh well, it holds true for anything.

Edited on by citizenerased

Playing: 999, Xenoblade Chronicles and Super Mario World
Finished: Pikmin, Kirby's Epic Yarn, Super Paper Mario and Uncharted 2

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Rawk_Hawk

24. Posted:

I don't mind bad games being released at all if you are referring to the services like the Virtual Console. I'll buy em

Edited on by Rawk_Hawk

"Practice hospitality. bless and do not curse." Romans 12:13-14