Yes because I only reach to download the first DKC and I missed the 2 and 3. I have the retail ones but i need to conect my SNES and I preffer the easy put and play of the Wii VC.
Me gusta jugar videojuegos. Soy de México. Sorry my english grammar. I love the Virtual Console, party and fighting games too.
Well I never got the chance to get them on the VC, which lead me to go other routes to play them.
Honestly though there are just ok games to me. I mean the graphics are nice and gameplay but I dont know for the SNES I always fell back onto SMW as my main platformer.
RetiredPush Square Moderator and all around retro gamer.
I don't miss them at all because I still have all 3 on my SD card in my Wii U to play whenever I like. I do however think they definitely need to be released for the Wii U Virtual Console since all 3 have been removed from the old Wii Shop...
After the crap that went down with 007 Goldeneye, I can't see Microsoft allowing the Donkey Kong trilogy to return to Nintendo's VC any time soon.
Tbh though, I really don't understand why Nintendo just doesn't buy the copyrights for those games, it'll save all of the hassle of paying Microsoft for rent on what is essentially Nintendo's IP's.
After the crap that went down with 007 Goldeneye, I can't see Microsoft allowing the Donkey Kong trilogy to return to Nintendo's VC any time soon.
Tbh though, I really don't understand why Nintendo just doesn't buy the copyrights for those games, it'll save all of the hassle of paying Microsoft for rent on what is essentially Nintendo's IP's.
Out of curiosity what happened with Microsoft?
Also DK is a Nintendo franchise how could Microsoft have a hold on these games?
After the crap that went down with 007 Goldeneye, I can't see Microsoft allowing the Donkey Kong trilogy to return to Nintendo's VC any time soon.
Tbh though, I really don't understand why Nintendo just doesn't buy the copyrights for those games, it'll save all of the hassle of paying Microsoft for rent on what is essentially Nintendo's IP's.
Out of curiosity what happened with Microsoft?
Also DK is a Nintendo franchise how could Microsoft have a hold on these games?
Nintendo owns the DK characters not the coding or any other parts of the DKC games, which is why they were able to make DKCR and DKCR:TF but couldn't use things like King K Rool or the Kremlings. Microsoft acquired those things when they bought Rare since Rare owned those things. Its also the reason why games like Donkey Kong Coconut Crackers for the GBA was turned into It's Mr. Pants and why Diddy Kong Pilot was changed to Banjo-Pilot since MS didnt own the characters.
Interesting rumor though its was believed by some MS executives that when they bought Rare the Donkey Kong license came with it thus making them think they owned the Donkey Kong name.
RetiredPush Square Moderator and all around retro gamer.
@Tasuki
Actually, I believe Nintendo still holds the rights to the Kremlings. Nintendo owns the entire Donkey Kong IP, Rare was simply licensed to use it.
ThePirateCaptain
3DS Friend Code: 3523-2096-8169 | Nintendo Network ID: Capn_Pancakes
@Tasuki
Actually, I believe Nintendo still holds the rights to the Kremlings. Nintendo owns the entire Donkey Kong IP, Rare was simply licensed to use it.
I though MS did cause if that was the case why didn't they use them in DKCR?
RetiredPush Square Moderator and all around retro gamer.
@Tasuki
Actually, I believe Nintendo still holds the rights to the Kremlings. Nintendo owns the entire Donkey Kong IP, Rare was simply licensed to use it.
I though MS did cause if that was the case why didn't they use them in DKCR?
I'm not sure why they weren't in DKCR; I think it was just Retro's decision to design new enemies. It wasn't a bad choice in my mind, since it effectively separates them from Retro's work.
ThePirateCaptain
3DS Friend Code: 3523-2096-8169 | Nintendo Network ID: Capn_Pancakes
Forums
Topic: The Old DKC Games
Posts 1 to 20 of 25
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.