Also I'm kind of wondering why the Zelda timeline matters. I always thought each game was just an individual story in its own right (such as Tim Burton's Batman and the Dark Knight tell a similar story but are different).
because why give a crap about the story in any previous Zelda if it's never gonna matter or be referenced in any new games.
Because they've already confirmed there is a timeline.
The closest to that ever happening is the Legend of Neil.
"Gee, it sure is boring around here." "I just wonder what Gaaaanon's up to!" "Oh boy! I'm so hungry, I could eat an Octorok!" "Great! I can't wait to bomb some Dodongos!"
because why give a crap about the story in any previous Zelda if it's never gonna matter or be referenced in any new games.
Because they've already confirmed there is a timeline.
Well isn't it a bit like the James Bond series? There's a lot of contradictions in there despite the fact it follows a timeline and previous films are referenced. For example - Casino Royale is considered to be the first story in the "timeline", yet it's set in the 21st century with more modern technology than, say, Goldfinger - set considerably later in this timeline. The reason it works is because you watch each film as an individual story - each one stands alone as its own story, despite being part of a series.
I would say that Super Mario Galaxy 2 contradicts Super Mario Galaxy story wise, but the games are supposed to be taken as "Mario either did this, or that" to my knowledge, which could easily be mistaken.
"I'm a heartbreaker...
My name... Charles." -The Greatest Man In Driftveil City
because why give a crap about the story in any previous Zelda if it's never gonna matter or be referenced in any new games.
Because they've already confirmed there is a timeline.
Well isn't it a bit like the James Bond series? There's a lot of contradictions in there despite the fact it follows a timeline and previous films are referenced. For example - Casino Royale is considered to be the first story in the "timeline", yet it's set in the 21st century with more modern technology than, say, Goldfinger - set considerably later in this timeline. The reason it works is because you watch each film as an individual story - each one stands alone as its own story, despite being part of a series.
Yeah, but Casino Royale was more intended as a reboot of the series.
Forums
Topic: Sequels that contradict the entire series
Posts 41 to 49 of 49
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.