Showing 1 to 20 of 25
1. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 19:53 GMT
I like the overall slim better but i really like the finish of the old one, even with all the fingerprint things, it looks way more advanced than the new one. Both are great, but beyond looks, id give the slim the edge i guess. What about you?
Edited on Sun 25th October, 2009 @ 19:53 by Modern_Legend
PSN ID: MixedMajikWii Number - 5995 0961 9020 5722 SSBB - 1504 5385 8344 Mario Kart Wii - 5327 1326 6518 Bomberman Blast 5370 8314 4869 Water Warfare 5327 9207 9563 http://www.nintendolife.com/chat
2. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:04 GMT
get that hat deal that you were talking about and get uncharted 2 and batman with it
PSN ID: castlehominid99
Nintendo Network ID: theironmango
3. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:16 GMT
U have a phat that u like?
4. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:17 GMT
Which one's cheaper?
Edited on Sun 25th October, 2009 @ 20:18 by CanisWolfred
...Wolf O'Donnel later crashed his Gundam, and went back to flying Wolfens...
I am the Wolf...Red
My Den - My door is always open....Too bad it's an empty closet.
My DeviantArt - I like to call it "the blank wall"
5. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:18 GMT
Neither. If I had to pick one though, I would go for Phat since it has Backwards compatibility.
Jesus is the only way.
It's OK for someone to have an opinion. This ain't the Soviet Union you know.
Nintendo Network ID: cheetahman91
6. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:38 GMT
not all of them do tho, remember that, only the old phats do, not the new phats
@Mickeymac Neither are cheaper, but they look very different
7. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:52 GMT
get the 160 gb with uncharted deal and you won't be dissapointed. I have a 60 gb phat
8. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 20:52 GMT
I got it back in spring 2007 for 600 bucks
9. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:06 GMT
back from where? did it break?
10. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:09 GMT
Um... I believe this site is called Nintendo life... not ps3 life.... geez )" />
11. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:29 GMT
LOL ummmm i believe this is called the OTHER GAMING thread aka "click other nintendo related threads if you want to talk nintendo and dont expect to see nintendo topics in this thread" thread. It just doesn't sound as nice to call it that, does it brion?
Edited on Sun 25th October, 2009 @ 21:30 by Modern_Legend
12. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:36 GMT
not all of them do tho, remember that, only the old phats do, not the new phats@Mickeymac Neither are cheaper, but they look very different
Then they both equally suck. I'm waiting for the price to go down.
13. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:38 GMT
man, 299 is a solid price, it is a blu ray and multimedia player in one. Most normal blu ray players which dont give games are way more expensive than a ps3 is now, and the ps3 still has one of the best blu ray players on the market. how can slashing 100 dollars off be too little for u, we cant expect them to make a BLU RAY player and video game console in one free lol
14. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:42 GMT
Even if it is a solid price, it could always go lower. And what I mean is 'what's the point of the Slim if the Phat costs just as much', and vice-versa. Until there's clear price difference, I could care less.
EDIT: I checked, and the Phat goes as low as $200 if you know where to look. The Phat wins.
Edited on Sun 25th October, 2009 @ 21:51 by CanisWolfred
15. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:48 GMT
I'd go for the Phat because it's a tank compared to the Slim.
Nintendo Network ID: Donth8
16. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:50 GMT
PS3 Phat. The only major difference (assuming you buy one that's not backwards compatible) is you won't be able to install Linux on a PS3 Slim. That's a major turn off for me, so if I ever get one I'm getting the Phat.
Leap before you think!My Backloggery: http://backloggery.com/samsam12My YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/fudgenuts64
17. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:50 GMT
who would pay 200 dollars for a wii with almost no internal memory or pay 300 for a ps3 with 120gb a blueray player a much better online and much better games
18. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 21:59 GMT
I would, because the Wii is cheaper, with cheaper games that go down in price fairly quickly.
19. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 22:06 GMT
Legend of zelda tpMario GalaxyBrawlMario Kartpaper marioand mario and sonic at the olympic games are all still 50 dollars to name a few while uncharted mgs4 and ratchet and clank future have all dropped down to 30
20. Posted: Sun 25th Oct 2009 22:17 GMT
I honestly don't care for any of those games. Besides, most of them are fairly cheap used. Meanwhile, the good games like No More Heroes, de Blob, and Okami go for $15-$25 new, and far less used. Heck, even Sonic Unleashed is $10 new(I Gotta remember to get that!). I'll conceed that even the few games I'd be interested in are pretty cheap, though. Still, I was only speaking from a personal standpoint - you asked who would do such a thing, and I spoke up. Simple as that. I simply couldn't afford to keep up with the PS3's library, nor would I want to (don't care for most of the games). Heck, the 360 has already been enough of a financial headache for us.@_@
Edited on Sun 25th October, 2009 @ 22:19 by CanisWolfred