I like the overall slim better but i really like the finish of the old one, even with all the fingerprint things, it looks way more advanced than the new one. Both are great, but beyond looks, id give the slim the edge i guess. What about you?
LOL ummmm i believe this is called the OTHER GAMING thread aka "click other nintendo related threads if you want to talk nintendo and dont expect to see nintendo topics in this thread" thread. It just doesn't sound as nice to call it that, does it brion?
man, 299 is a solid price, it is a blu ray and multimedia player in one. Most normal blu ray players which dont give games are way more expensive than a ps3 is now, and the ps3 still has one of the best blu ray players on the market. how can slashing 100 dollars off be too little for u, we cant expect them to make a BLU RAY player and video game console in one free lol
PSN ID: MixedMajik Wii Number - 5995 0961 9020 5722 SSBB - 1504 5385 8344 Mario Kart Wii - 5327 1326 6518 Bomberman Blast 5370 8314 4869 Water Warfare 5327 9207 9563 http://www.nintendoli...
man, 299 is a solid price, it is a blu ray and multimedia player in one. Most normal blu ray players which dont give games are way more expensive than a ps3 is now, and the ps3 still has one of the best blu ray players on the market. how can slashing 100 dollars off be too little for u, we cant expect them to make a BLU RAY player and video game console in one free lol
Even if it is a solid price, it could always go lower. And what I mean is 'what's the point of the Slim if the Phat costs just as much', and vice-versa. Until there's clear price difference, I could care less.
EDIT: I checked, and the Phat goes as low as $200 if you know where to look. The Phat wins.
PS3 Phat. The only major difference (assuming you buy one that's not backwards compatible) is you won't be able to install Linux on a PS3 Slim. That's a major turn off for me, so if I ever get one I'm getting the Phat.
Leap before you think! My Backloggery: http://backloggery.com/samsam12 My YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/fudgenuts64
who would pay 200 dollars for a wii with almost no internal memory or pay 300 for a ps3 with 120gb a blueray player a much better online and much better games
PSN ID: castlehominid99
3DS Friend Code: 0731-4849-6143 | Nintendo Network ID: theironmango
who would pay 200 dollars for a wii with almost no internal memory or pay 300 for a ps3 with 120gb a blueray player a much better online and much better games
I would, because the Wii is cheaper, with cheaper games that go down in price fairly quickly.
Legend of zelda tp Mario Galaxy Brawl Mario Kart paper mario and mario and sonic at the olympic games are all still 50 dollars to name a few while uncharted mgs4 and ratchet and clank future have all dropped down to 30
PSN ID: castlehominid99
3DS Friend Code: 0731-4849-6143 | Nintendo Network ID: theironmango
Legend of zelda tp Mario Galaxy Brawl Mario Kart paper mario and mario and sonic at the olympic games are all still 50 dollars to name a few while uncharted mgs4 and ratchet and clank future have all dropped down to 30
I honestly don't care for any of those games. Besides, most of them are fairly cheap used. Meanwhile, the good games like No More Heroes, de Blob, and Okami go for $15-$25 new, and far less used. Heck, even Sonic Unleashed is $10 new(I Gotta remember to get that!). I'll conceed that even the few games I'd be interested in are pretty cheap, though. Still, I was only speaking from a personal standpoint - you asked who would do such a thing, and I spoke up. Simple as that. I simply couldn't afford to keep up with the PS3's library, nor would I want to (don't care for most of the games). Heck, the 360 has already been enough of a financial headache for us.@_@
Forums
Topic: PS3 Phat vs PS3 Slim - Your pick?
Posts 1 to 20 of 25
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.