Forums

Topic: Are gamers ageist?

Posts 41 to 46 of 46

AceDefective

Dezzy wrote:

CanisWolfred wrote:

Or we could just wipe out labels entirely. I'm all for that.

I entirely agree. I don't bother with any labels, even the ones that fit. Unfortunately, some people seem to like them. Perhaps a more feasible alternative is have lots of different labels and group allegiances so that you never tie your entire identity to a single one.

I believe in labels as a neutral concept. Labels are descriptive terms meant to help identify what/who something/someone is. True, people use them negatively and falsely sometimes but honestly, you being bothered by the term is a sign you just need thicker skin (no offense). That being said though, ageist is a strange term to throw around. While age and maturity are not the same thing, they are intertwined to some extent, so I can understand why some people discourage others for not being old enough to really grasp a concept.

Edited on by AceDefective

Just some random loser who loves a variety of things.
Youtube Channel | Deviant ART | YoYo Games account |

3DS Friend Code: 2079-6493-1326 | Nintendo Network ID: ZeroZX_Dev | Twitter:

CanisWolfred

I don't like labels because I already have a label I gave myself. It's my name. It's the only thing strangers need to know about me. You want to know more? Then actually be willing to get to know who I really am, instead of trying to lump me in with a bunch of other people based on a loose set of characteristics your selective memory chose to identify me with.

I am the Wolf...Red
Backloggery | DeviantArt
Wolfrun?

unrandomsam

Its like saying are white people ageist ? or are men ageist ? or are women ? (Some are / some are not).

“30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure”
Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.

LzWinky

CanisWolfred wrote:

I don't like labels because I already have a label I gave myself. It's my name. It's the only thing strangers need to know about me. You want to know more? Then actually be willing to get to know who I really am, instead of trying to lump me in with a bunch of other people based on a loose set of characteristics your selective memory chose to identify me with.

I don't think labels are bad (well most of them anyway), but how they are used is bad

Current games: Everything on Switch

Switch Friend Code: SW-5075-7879-0008 | My Nintendo: LzWinky | Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

Dezzy

ZeroZX_Dev wrote:

I believe in labels as a neutral concept. Labels are descriptive terms meant to help identify what/who something/someone is. True, people use them negatively and falsely sometimes but honestly, you being bothered by the term is a sign you just need thicker skin (no offense). That being said though, ageist is a strange term to throw around. While age and maturity are not the same thing, they are intertwined to some extent, so I can understand why some people discourage others for not being old enough to really grasp a concept.

I agree with most of that. But I think you're missing something too. The problem with labels is that people generalise and create positive or negative attitudes towards certain labels for whatever reason. What then happens is that you get a huge problem when people who use that same label don't fit into your general attitude. You get bad people exploiting the benefits of operating under a positive label.
So when people get annoyed that people like me criticise religions and they come with the almost cliched response of "you're generalising", they always seem to forget the fact that religions are generalised in nearly every law in the western world (for their benefit). If you want to get tax free status, does it matter exactly what your church teaches? Nope, as long as it's christian it's fine. That's the double standard that labels create.

It's dangerous to go alone! Stay at home.

KingMike

rayword45 wrote:

(when older people think that solely because they're older, they know the school system better despite the fact that it's kids who spend 7 hours a day in school)

Depends what the issue is.
I'd sure at 13, I'd have loved to have soda for lunch every day. And I'm sure the Coca-Cola Company would love it too.
Once you get much older you realize what a bad idea that is. Having teeth is good.

Though I read about kids these days who don't like having fruit and such for lunch in cafeterias. I'd rather have that since that sounds like food.
The pizza and hamburgers we had back in my day sucked anyways.

Edited on by KingMike

KingMike

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.