14,721DezzySun 15th Oct 2017 Lol, they interviewed a japanese person and used the word "eulogistic". Were they just trying to annoy the interpreter? Octane wrote: Jeuxvideo wrote: Let’s finish with a question that has been tormenting some big fans of the series: where does Breath of the Wild sit in the official timeline? Eiji Aonuma: Actually, those timeline-related questions are difficult because we’ve never designed any Zelda games by saying “hey, we’re going to put that game here, we need to have it fit into this period or that one, etc.” That’s not what comes first for us. But indeed, once the game is released and we’ve been able to develop our story, we can tell each other “oh yes, we can make it fit here”, but that’s not important to us. Especially since there could be contradictions in every new game if we tried to follow the timeline. If we can put a game in the timeline, that’s great, but as for Breath of the Wild, we haven’t really decided where it belongs for now. Good to see that nonsense is put to rest. As I've said from the start: The whole timeline was a nonsense thing someone at Nintendo invented retrospectively so they could sell a book. It's so obviously contrived. I don't see why anyone takes it seriously. Edited on Sun 15th October, 2017 @ 18:55 by Dezzy Converted from Sony to Nintendo during 7th gen and never looked back.