Jeremyx7 wrote:
I agree with most of you that there is usually bias 'positive' or 'negative' in most reviews of anything in life. What I disagree with is what makes a written review doesn't have to have opinions involved. Just stating observations, actual facts about how the game operates, technical glitches, those sorts of things without personal feelings CAN STILL BE CONSIDERED A WRITTEN REVIEW.
I think allot of you are misunderstanding what I'm trying to say here. That or just completely taking things way out of context just to try further your own arguments. Maybe I'm not being clear enough?
That's a technical review.
We're talking about critical reviews here. You know, the ones you see on games websites.
Technical reviews are deathly boring and a completely impractical way of reviewing something that has no definite measures of quality. They're for things like IT hardware where clock speeds etc are measurable. How, exactly, do you measure the quality of a game without inserting personal opinion? Go on, prove me wrong with just one example. Any example. From anywhere on the Internet.
Go on.