Showing 21 to 40 of 286
21. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:44 BST
The New York Times is not the best place to cite sources. Since they are heavily biased. And the thing on improvement is needed in the US but NOT government run health care. What we need is the ability to buy health insurance nation wide and not be restricted to what state we live in. This would cause the cost of health care to come down and quality to rise. Unlike the House plan where costs will go UP and quality will go DOWN.
I rule when it comes to games. So deal with it.
22. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:45 BST
Bahamut ZERO,Vendetta & Gameking23 are 110% Correct.
VGM = Video Game Musician http://twitter.com/VGP94
23. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:45 BST
No. People who can afford health care will be "punished" with extra taxes and lower quality medical attention.
What he said.
I made Kid Tripp! PocketGamer gave it a 9 out of 10! You should totally buy it now!
[16:39] BadKitty: you trying to steal stuff from me? u_u
[16:41] kribs: don't worry Emmy, even if poix tried to steal something from you, he wouldn't finish stealing it
Nintendo Network ID: pixelpowa | Twitter: thatpixelguy
24. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:46 BST
25. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:54 BST
For clarfication, the experts were the research groups that did the scientific polling.
Taxes are actually lower now for the middle class than they were under Bush Jr. So I don't get were you guys are coming from. Nobody likes taxes, but you need them to run a nation properly. Countries without taxes are third world nations!!!
EXPERIENCE MORE.... Arcade-quality graphics, awesome sound, "turbo-charged" game play, exciting TurboChip games... It's the incredible Turbo Genesis 64 Entertainment SuperSystem Experience. There's more fun, more challenge, and more excitment ready for you today!
26. Posted: Mon 10th Aug 2009 23:57 BST
Given that I have a great health care coverage at work, I'd say leave it alone. But if I was someone who had no health care, I'm sure I might be all for it. I tend to prefer that the government stay out of as much of my personal stuff as possible, as a general rule.
Plain old gamer :)
27. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:01 BST
T-Gen please, you're all over the map. I've heard no one here protesting taxes. What I personally object to is when my taxes and those of millions of others are misappropriated to support failing endeavours.
I ask you a personal question that is for you to answer in your own way, whether here or just silently in your heart. Would you prefer your uncle to have private insurance and health care provided at Memorial Sloan-Kettering or government healthcare provided at a clinic? And again, whatever your answer and whatever his provider, I wish him a full and speedy recovery and many happy years to come.
Ex cineribus resurgoWii / Speak / Music: 3991 9961 5576 0184 · · · · Mario Kart Wii: 3609 8999 1445· · · · · · · ·Alien Crush: 1934 4006 9660The Conduit: 2622 0458 3119· · · · · · · · · · · · · · Water Warfare: 4726 5832 1608· · · · · · · Onslaught: 0388 6842 8268
28. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:05 BST
@Turbo Genesis: Taxes are lower for the middle class? I have not heard of a single tax cut since Obama took office, only raises. Your nation needs taxes to function, yes, but how much do you really need? This would pour over into arguments about everything, particularly the war in Iraq now, where loads of cash is going(it's like a billion dollars for one plane). That is something i would rather not discuss. This thread is not about taxes, it's about health care.
What is what should be discussed is health care. Taxes will be raised. Fact. Quality will be lower. Fact.
Edited on Tue 11th August, 2009 @ 00:06 by Bahamut_ZERO
29. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:05 BST
I think the whole profit medical system is sick and boarding on inhumane even for those who have coverage.
When my grandma was dying from breast cancer, the doctor told our family she just had days left to live. We later found out that after he said that they still did 89 x-rays on a frail dying woman who had her breasts removed and charged it to the insurance companies. it was needless to do that and make her suffer more. It was just to make money. She was like a little cash cow for them.
Edited on Tue 11th August, 2009 @ 00:15 by Turbo_Genesis_64
30. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:08 BST
@Turbo Genesis: People need to make a living you know. It's not inhumane, the doctor didn't do anything that would harm her or anything. Besides, who is sure that those x-rays were taken to make money instead of being positive she couldn't be saved?
31. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:10 BST
I live in England and have a chronic illness. Without the NHS, I would have spent thousands and thousands of pounds (which I can't afford) on treatment. Free healthcare FTW
Edited on Tue 11th August, 2009 @ 00:11 by CJ1
32. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:13 BST
Education isn't for profit. Fire Departments aren't for profit. Police Departments aren't for profit.
So don't give me, it's ok to screw over a dying woman and X-ray the hell out of her just to squeeze some final bucks out of her!
33. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:13 BST
@CJ: Point exactly. Free is better for those who can afford it. Those who can don't like it. It all depends on your financial situation.
34. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:19 BST
Is it really free when you pay it with your taxmoney? I don't approve universal health care, but I do like the idea of more affordable health care. Give health care to those who are working (and their family) or who can't due to disabilities, age, etc.
Nintendo Life Community Administrator
Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery
Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky
35. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:19 BST
@Zero Given that the rich can afford the tax, and the poor can't afford insurance. Isn't free better, all round?
(and we still have private healthcare, for those that want 'premium' service)
Don't let middle class white america media, tell you government run healthcare is a bad service.
Edited on Tue 11th August, 2009 @ 00:20 by CJ1
36. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:24 BST
Thanks CJ for some perspective on someone who actually has benefited from a government run health care system. Sounds like you owe your life to it.
37. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:24 BST
Wow, a topic I can get into.
I think we should:
The absolute last thing we need to do is go with the Britain or Canada approach, we need to work to find away that minimizes government intervention instead of creating a universal health care system.
To quote James Bartholomew: "Taken as a whole, Britain's universal healthcare system has evolved into a ramshackle structure where tests are underperformed, equipment is undersupplied, operations are underdone, and medical personnel are overworked, underpaid and overly tied down in red tape. In other words, your chances of coming out of the American medical system alive are dramatically better than in Britain."
I had fun once and it was awful.
38. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:29 BST
Perhaps, the worst aspect about a for profit health care system is that we have to watch all of these stupid and awkward erectile dysfunction commercials 24/7!
39. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:32 BST
Thanks Genesis, I do owe alot to the NHS, without it, my life would be a struggle, i'm sure.
@Swiket, that quote may be true, to an extent. But if you chop your finger off with a buzzsaw in the UK, no doctor will say "negligence, we cant fix that"
40. Posted: Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:34 BST
Viva..............nevermind, I hate those commercials. How about those meds that make eyelashes longer, and you need a prescription!
Sorry, this topic has been locked.