I feel like Nintendo should keep doing what they're doing, which is keep rotating some Nintendo characters with other characters so that the life of the characters are expanded. To be honest, I think that characters like Mario and Pikachu (more like Pokemon in general) will live shorter than Samus and Kirby. Why? Because Samus and Kirby have had very little games compared to Mario and Pikachu. I fear this may also happen to Zelda. Look at the how many years we've had without a Zelda game in the last 4 years. So far we've only had 2008 without a Zelda game, and that includes the VC as well.
Thanks given to Xkhaoz for that one avatar. Please contact me before using my custom avatar!
A (Former) Reviewer for Digitally Downloaded.net
My Backloggery: http://backloggery.com/v8_ninja
Nintendo almost has too many mascots... And still, some still deserve even more publicity and games like Captain Falcon ;-D. They even could make games around The Hunters from Metroid Prime DS, Star Fox members (like it already happened in SFA) or complexer developed Pokemon like Lucario.
Stary honestly dissapointed me. I don't like the way the American release turned him into a very almost laughable character. It way overdone. I really like the import versions I wasnt impressed with The Legendary Starfy. I dont think him being a new Iconic Character would be a good thing for Nintendo.
I Would like to see Captain Falcon make a return as well. I also would like a new Luigis Mansion Please.
3DS FC: 4382-2029-8015
All my News and Reviews in One convenient place!
Forums
Topic: Does Nintendo need a new iconic character?
Posts 61 to 69 of 69
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.