Showing 61 to 63 of 63
61. Posted: Sun 29th Apr 2012 19:49 BST
tl;dr but even if Sony had motion controls as an idea in 2004, there is no way it would have been taken 1/10 as seriously by Sony before the Wii's huge success. Otherwise, at best it would have been one of the typical gimmick ideas from the big 3 (see: Powerglove, Donkey Kongo, that stupid notKinect camera thing they had for PS2) that's thrown out there for lulz without any thought of making it a focus of the entire console. This is all because they aren't idiots. They are smart people who make money (Ps3 launch aside). I don't mind Move's existance but I would have preferred they were more subtle about influences or at least weren't pretending to be super new and innovative at the exact same time when absolutely no one was buying that for a second (it's really just the next logical step from Wiimotes). I mean, I think Kinect is 5-10 years too early to live up to potential but at least it's different than the most obvious and often compared competitor.
also this thread will fail quickly because of both fanboys and unironic anti-fanboy fanboys already predicting this thread's failure. Seriously, I'm not sure what the point is...
Edit: Also, I'm not sure what is worse, denial that Wii's popularity had nothing to do with Move or denial that Skyrim doesn't have problems. Move wouldn't have been made into such a big deal before then, get over it. Skyrim is awesome but has a ton of problems, get over it.
Edited on Sun 29th April, 2012 @ 20:06 by kkslider5552000
3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Nintendo Network ID: SliderGamer55
All you people want sequels...how 'bout good new nintendo franchises?
62. Posted: Mon 30th Apr 2012 11:57 BST
This isn't a Sony-bashing thread. This is a Nintendo-bashing thread.You guys can see this can't you?All of the Sony fanboys (that for some reason have an account on NintendoLife) are flying to their keyboards to defend Sony by saying they aren't copying, but "improving" or "giving Nintendo some competition."All I have to ask is this: If Sony isn't copying Nintendo, and yes I mean copying (especially with PlayStation All-Stars), how come they didn't come out with their ideas BEFORE Nintendo did? And when I say come out, I mean MAKE POPULAR, INNOVATE UPON, and the like.Sony had the Move idea before the Wii came out, but they didn't innovate on the tech and just let it gather dust while the Wii shined.If Sony made All-Stars the way it was INTENTIONALLY, why couldn't they have at least officially credited Smash Bros.?And as for the whole "Well, certain genres have the same ______, so what did you expect..." argument, they didn't HAVE to make it like that. They could have done it with a different style field like in God of War/Dante's Inferno. They could have still made it a fighter that didn't look exactly like Smash Bros. is what I'm trying to say.
Bottom line though, if Sony is so original, how come THEY have done more copying (or, hang on) "similar things" from the other companies than Nintendo and Microsoft combined?
Edited on Mon 30th April, 2012 @ 11:58 by kyuubikid213
Wii Owner, 3DS Owner, Wii U Owner
I promise to not derail threads. Request from theblackdragon
I promise to be a mature individual. Request from theblackdragon
3DS Friend Code: 4639-9073-1731 | Nintendo Network ID: kyuubikid213
63. Posted: Mon 30th Apr 2012 12:12 BST
that for some reason have an account on NintendoLife
I didn't know I had to put Nintendo on a pedestal to join this site.
I want your whiskey mouth all over my blonde south
I am an art popist. I assign art to things that are popular. I place new meaning on that which already exist.
We could belong together.
Sony Entertainment Network: naviator_9
Nintendo Network ID: Aviator9