Forums

Topic: 3D Without the Glasses For Television!

Posts 1 to 20 of 50

RoyalBlur

Now if only the 3D television designers could come with a glasses free method of watching the programs without those glasses like Nintendo has done with the 3DS.

Below is a demonstration of a glasses free 3D television:

[youtube:<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0SyuEjBEMN4&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0SyuEjBEMN4&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>]

Edited on by RoyalBlur

Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the LORD's servant? Isaiah 42:19

My Youtube Page: http://www.youtube.com/user/royalusher

3DS FC: 2234-7146-6576

Twitter.com/ToyKoRedDawN

Funky_Gamer

Huh. Is that supposed to be a link or an image? Well lets hope that this someday comes true!

"Remember: when life rocks you, RAWK BACK!" ~Rawk Hawk
FNS: Y B L R R R B >

RoyalBlur

Thanks Link Hero, that is indeed the video of which I was trying to post. I'm so very sorry about that Funky Gamer.

Edited on by RoyalBlur

Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the LORD's servant? Isaiah 42:19

My Youtube Page: http://www.youtube.com/user/royalusher

3DS FC: 2234-7146-6576

Twitter.com/ToyKoRedDawN

Sean_Aaron

They're already saying the auto-stereoscopic technology in the 3DS will come down in price enough that you'll start seeing TVs using it in five year's time. Of course that begs the question of why they're rushing to push technology to market that is likely to have a negative reception from people who don't fancy replacing their recently-purchased flat panel TV and buying multiple pairs of expensive glasses to wear in order to watch it with family/friends. Surely you'd get a better feel for the popularity of the technology by adopting that which requires the least mucking about on the part of the end user?

I still see no point to 3D on a 2D display, so my money will be staying put!

BLOG, mail: [email protected]
Nintendo ID: sean.aaron

romulux

i remember reading about tvs that have cameras to detect where your eyes are and then send a different image into each one, producing 3D without glasses in a vaguely similar way to the 3DS. the problem is that only a few people can watch at once and they'd have to be sitting all in one place, otherwise the tv can't keep up.

goldeneye- 5447 4748 5174

moosa

Sean+Aaron wrote:

I still see no point to 3D on a 2D display, so my money will be staying put!

What on Earth do you mean by that?

Stop complaining and GO PLAY GAMES.

Sean_Aaron

No, I mean that your television is a flat panel, as opposed to projecting a hologram or a "true" 3D image which would be 3D even if viewed from multiple angles. Using technical trickery (or wizardry, depending on how enamoured you are of it) seems like a big waste of time to me. It's only a couple of steps removed from the old red-green specs you're referring to and not terribly worthwhile.

BLOG, mail: [email protected]
Nintendo ID: sean.aaron

moomoo

I only see the use for this 3D technique on handheld devices, like the 3DS and phones. Since their a handheld, you can easily change the viewing angle. You can't do that with a TV.

Best thread ever
Feel free to add me on Miiverse or PSN.
Miiverse is Moomoo14, PSN is Moomoo1405390

3DS Friend Code: 4940-5561-6002 | Nintendo Network ID: Moomoo14

Sean_Aaron

I can see this affecting some game design, but outside of Looksley's Line-up-style games, it really does seem to be just about "stuff coming out the screen at you" and I don't really care about that.

BLOG, mail: [email protected]
Nintendo ID: sean.aaron

AlexSays

Sean+Aaron wrote:

It's only a couple of steps removed from the old red-green specs you're referring to and not terribly worthwhile.

That's how technology usually works, a couple steps at a time.

AlexSays

Adam

That doesn't make it interesting.

Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.

RoyalBlur

romulux wrote:

i remember reading about tvs that have cameras to detect where your eyes are and then send a different image into each one, producing 3D without glasses in a vaguely similar way to the 3DS. the problem is that only a few people can watch at once and they'd have to be sitting all in one place, otherwise the tv can't keep up.

LOL. Sitting together in one place? Well, at lest that would have one positive effect. It would be a sure fire way of bringing families closer together in stunning, magical and happy 3D.

Edited on by RoyalBlur

Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the LORD's servant? Isaiah 42:19

My Youtube Page: http://www.youtube.com/user/royalusher

3DS FC: 2234-7146-6576

Twitter.com/ToyKoRedDawN

Macaronius

Can you hear that?
If you listen closely, you can hear Sony screaming in rage.

*Hunt the Hare and turn her down the rocky road
all the way to Dublin, Whack follol de rah!*

SuperPeach

@ProtoZone ....I hear it.

I have no doubts that they could make glasses free tv.

SuperPeach

AlexSays

It's not about being interesting, it's about continually advancing.

Which for people with short attention spans, certainly doesn't mean much in the here and now.

ProtoZone wrote:

Can you hear that?
If you listen closely, you can hear Sony screaming in rage.

...Why would they be 'screaming in rage'?

AlexSays

Adam

Of course it's about interesting. No one is going to buy the most expensive TV possible for the sake of funding the continual advancement of technology, haha. If they want it to catch on and sell, it has to be interesting. My attention span is fine, thanks.

Not that continually advancing technology isn't important, but assuming they want people to buy this, it's relevant.

Edited on by Adam

Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.

AlexSays

(1) Holograms don't happen without this 'meaningless, pointless' step.

(2) Most people do think it's interesting.

AlexSays

Macaronius

AlexSays wrote:

ProtoZone wrote:

Can you hear that?
If you listen closely, you can hear Sony screaming in rage.

...Why would they be 'screaming in rage'?

Because they justed wasted an gargantuan amount of money on making a 3D television which requires glasses for the 3D to be enabled.
More people prefer a "no-glasses" 3D television set, and more people will purchase this television as opposed to Sony's BRAVIA HX800 Series 3D HDTV, and Sony will recieve very little money from this product, because it's "old technlogy"
In a nutshell, auto-stereoscopic display > "with-glasses-3D"

Edited on by Macaronius

*Hunt the Hare and turn her down the rocky road
all the way to Dublin, Whack follol de rah!*

Adam

AlexSays wrote:

(1) Holograms don't happen without this 'meaningless, pointless' step.

(2) Most people do think it's interesting.

No one said anything contrary to either point, that I noticed. Sean was saying he personally wasn't buying it, and I was agreeing with him.

Edited on by Adam

Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.

AlexSays

Yes, I noticed. Presentation is key, my dear two-legged eggplant.

ProtoZone wrote:

Because they justed wasted an gargantuan amount of money on making a 3D television which requires glasses for the 3D to be enabled.
More people prefer a "no-glasses" 3D television set, and more people will purchase this television as opposed to Sony's BRAVIA HX800 Series 3D HDTV, and Sony will recieve very little money from this product, because it's "old technlogy"
In a nutshell, auto-stereoscopic display > "with-glasses-3D"

lolokeedokee

They said at its soonest, this will be on the market in five years.

Everyone is going to wait five, six maybe seven years until this comes out? I'd think about that for a moment.

Edited on by AlexSays

AlexSays

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.