Showing 81 to 92 of 92
81. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:20 GMT
CH405K1N6 wrote:Oh, come on. You've got to be kidding me.If you have a problem with swearing, then why don't you just get off the internet. Seriously.This is an all-ages site and so we take it rather seriously. I'd rather people who are unable to stop themselves from typing expletives get off the internet (or at least confine it to spaces where it's accepted). Seriously.
Oh, come on. You've got to be kidding me.If you have a problem with swearing, then why don't you just get off the internet. Seriously.
Oh, come on. You've got to be kidding me.
If you have a problem with swearing, then why don't you just get off the internet. Seriously.
This is an all-ages site and so we take it rather seriously. I'd rather people who are unable to stop themselves from typing expletives get off the internet (or at least confine it to spaces where it's accepted). Seriously.
Sean is right (when isn`t he? ). My view is that they shouldn`t be swearing, but a censor just covers it up. Right now, most of us, if we swear, we cover it up with something. Be it an asterisk (*) or this thingy-mabob: @, we usually cover it up. But we had to have had a reason to use that word in the first place, everyone get upset, everyone swears, just in their own way. I don`t get this taboo we have on certain words, you swear to make a point and all intensive purposes, "fudge" is a swear word when used as one. Some people replace "bull****" with "bull", but it is still swearing. You`re not eliminating it, you`re just covering it up and suddenly it is ok to say these words in a context in which similar words, it is not. The words began being bad words, not swear words, but then people started swearing with them, so then it isn`t right to swear. But if it isn`t right to swear, why can we use "fudge"? Or "flossewaffle"? So, in truth, it must be the meaning of the word that we have a problem with. Which, at least to me, is kind of interesting. It`s not swearing that is the problem, but the meaning of the "swear".So, for someone who doesn`t know the meaning of the word, why is it bad for them to hear it? I can`t think of any definite explanation, but it is interesting to think about. To me anyway.
Ok, how about this: Do you want people swearing, but cover it up somehow, or do you want it minimized/eliminated? I think that is kind of a central question to all of this.Oh, and sorry about the overly long analysis.
Edited on Sat 6th March, 2010 @ 01:20 by Ravage
Sean Aaron ~ "The secret is out: I'm really an American cat-girl."Q: How many physicists does it take to change a light bulb?A: Two, one to hold the light bulb, the other to rotate the universe.Just Say No To Toast!
82. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:20 GMT
@'Chu: perhaps in one sense of the [insert-word-here], maybe
Edited on Sat 6th March, 2010 @ 01:21 by theblackdragon
BEST THREAD EVER
future of NL >:3
[16:43] James: I should learn these site rules more clearly
[16:44] LztheBlehBird: James doesn't know the rules? For shame!!!
[16:44] Vintage: We have rules?
[16:44] Reala: don't expose the staff to sunlight, don't get them wet and don't feed them after midnight
3DS Friend Code: 3136-6802-7042 | Nintendo Network ID: gentlemen_cat | Twitter: theblackdragon
83. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:21 GMT
FFS people this aint no frakkin joke, this is some serious 5h1t!
84. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:22 GMT
Go yourselfs! Then your with a " /> before I with a then the !
This lesbian bar doesent have a fire exit!
85. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:27 GMT
I say we censor the ":3" thing. It wasn't too bad whenever people started using it, but now it's just getting tiresome. Hopefully a new fad'll come along and the :3 will be forgotten. Like that'll happen.
Jesus is the only way.
It's OK for someone to have an opinion. This ain't the Soviet Union you know.
Nintendo Network ID: cheetahman91
86. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:27 GMT
"Go scream yourselves! Then scream your happiness with a halo before I scream with a frown then smile the frown!"?Is that what you said, mal?
Wanderloggery | StarBlog
Massive retro gamer with a heart <3
Big Wander Over Yonder fan
ActRaiser is the most overexposed Quintet SNES game ever!
23 and proud =)
To each their own
87. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:27 GMT
What the DDDD:!?!?
Edited on Sat 6th March, 2010 @ 01:28 by pixelman
I made Kid Tripp! PocketGamer gave it a 9 out of 10! You should totally buy it now!
[16:39] BadKitty: you trying to steal stuff from me? u_u
[16:41] kribs: don't worry Emmy, even if poix tried to steal something from you, he wouldn't finish stealing it
3DS Friend Code: 1123-6536-5321 | Nintendo Network ID: pixelpowa | Twitter: thatpixelguy
88. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:30 GMT
cheetahman91 wrote:I say we censor the ":3" thing. It wasn't too bad whenever people started using it, but now it's just getting tiresome. Hopefully a new fad'll come along and the :3 will be forgotten. Like that'll happen.What the DDDD:!?!?
exactly also, :3
89. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:31 GMT
I find myself in complete agreement with the ninety-first man of cheetahs.
Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.
90. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:37 GMT
Perfect example for what I hate about censors, we get incoherent babble on the level of a 7 year-old who just discovered the swear words.
91. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 01:52 GMT
I find it easy not to swear.
92. Posted: Sat 6th Mar 2010 02:25 GMT
There's a 'your mom' joke in here that I'm not allowed to say. :3
Anyways, if any of y'all have a problem with cursing, you can go and :3 yourselves for all I care.
just kidding, seriously, but really, it's not that bad around here, jeez
Lieutenant Commander of the Lesbian Love Brigade
There can only be one, like in that foreign movie where there could only be one, and in the end there is only one dude left, because that was the point.
Sorry, this topic has been locked.