Forums

Topic: DS Lite better than DSi?

Posts 21 to 40 of 58

irken004

I find much more usage out of my DSi, since i have no ipod or camera. So, i use that as a camera and music player

and the matte finish.....GORGEOUS!!!

minial100

DSi kicks the crap out of DS lite. I mean like, download awesome games, take picture, listen to music, and so what if the battery lasts a few hours less (not half!), it's still a amazing piece of hardware!

DECEPTICONS SUPERIOR; AUTOBOTS INFERIOR
My BL|Come chat!|NSMBW IS HERE!

hylianhalcyon

Chrono+Cross wrote:

@hylian
No the DSi has the same hardware as the other DS system just that the DSi has more functions in which uses up more battery juice in this case.
If you would`ve read the postd above^^ you would know this.
(Though I didn`t learn it myself from reading their posts all in all its kinda common sense.)

The DSi battery is smaller then the other models' batteries. Since it is smaller(not half the size) it doesn't last as long. Having more going on is part of it but not completely. BTW, I did read the above post.

"People who alter or destroy works of art and cultural heritage for profit, or as an exercise of power, are barbarians." - George Lucas, 1988

Bankai

The+Fox wrote:

For now, yes the DS Lite is FAR better, The DSi has nothing that justifies its cost for such a minimal upgrade. However, a year down the line I may very well change my tune. We'll have to wait and see.

I have 12 games on the DSi that can never be played on the DS Lite. I haven't downloaded a single clock or calculator - those 12 games are games.

The amount of time I have played all 12 games more than justifies the DSi's price point - and that's not including the fun I've had with the cameras, MP3 player, and the potential for more to come.

Mabbit

I think that the DSi has only 1 flaw
No GBA slot
Who cares about the battery. The DS lite's battery lasts like 10 hours. Will you really play the DSi for 5 hours straight without being able to charge it? and if youre using it for longer than 5 hours,just turn down the brightness

Heisenberg says "relax!"
The user formerly known as briunj04
PSN=mabbit04/Summoner name(LoL)=briunj04

SpentAllMyTokens

I didn't have a DS, so I really debated this. I have a gba, so if I never see a VC, it won't be the end of the world for me. With a DS lite, wouldn't save a whole lot of space carrying around a gba, since i'd need to carry around the games. Plus, if i want to play gb/gbc games, I'd need to carry around either my gbc or gba anyways. The only thing it would really matter for is Guitar Hero (don't care), or transferring Pokemon from fire red/leaf green (since I think you can get all the Kanto Pokemon in Gold/Silver that won't be a problem once the DS remakes come out).

I really like mighty flip champs, so hopefully with more cheap and fun games like that it'll be awesome. I also like you can use both types of wireless. I don't use it much for internet browsing (have an iphone), but it'll be sweet for playing games online. A VC would really be icing on the cake for me, so I wouldn't have to carry other games around, could play old gb games with a backlight, and not have to dig though ebay to find old carts.

To be honest though, if I had a DS or DS Light already, I'd probably not upgrade until I got a VC. It's enough for me to choose a DSi over a DS Lite, but not enough for me to buy a DS twice.

Edited on by SpentAllMyTokens

I am way too lazy to think of something clever.
My Backloggery

metakirbyknight

AlexSays wrote:

Contrary to popular belief, the DSi doesn't have any extra hardware for games, so it won't be getting any exclusive retail games. Regular DS owners will never miss out when it comes to retail games.

Contrary to AlexSays idiotic fanboyish rambles the DSi actually has four times the RAM. (Source- Here and Here)
Also, the DS Phat/Lite has a combined 100 MHz CPU(s) and the DSi has a 133 MHz main CPU, yes only the main CPU is more powerful than the DS Phat/Lites main processor and co-processor combined!
Compared to the DS Lite this is a gaming PC.

And, on top of that the GBA has a 32-bit 16.8 MHz processor (the DSi is a 64-bit machine) so if they work hard, the emu should work.

Also, I was right!

Edited on by metakirbyknight

Stalk me on my Twitter.
Proud Homebrewer.

warioswoods

Oh look, it's the recurring debate about the DSi's specs, complete with the usual suspects, and AlexSays throwing out ungrounded conjecture as fact.

Once again, here's a more reasoned look at the situation:

  • The DSi does indeed have a considerably faster CPU and four times the RAM of the DS Lite.
  • These upgraded specs are necessary for certain new features like the cameras and real-time distortion effects, smoother web browser, music playback with manipulation, etc.
  • Nintendo specifically confirmed that there will be two new varieties of retail games on the shelves eventually: DSi-enhanced games, which will run on either system but will offer special features on the DSi; and DSi-exclusive games, that will not run at all on a standard DS/Lite.
  • We don't know a whole lot about what these games will look like or how prevalent they will be, and it all depends greatly upon the success of the DSi going forward, as well as the related install-base to cost calculations made by developers.
  • We do know, however, that these exclusive retail games will be accessing the special features of the DSi, like using the cameras in real-time for various gameplay innovations.
  • If these exclusive games are able to access the special features of the DSi, they'll need to access the full specs that are required in order to use these features smoothly, so exclusive retail games will certainly be breaking the CPU and RAM limits of the DS Lite, at least while completing these special functions.
  • Knowing how Nintendo's hardware generally works, if a game's code is able to use the additional RAM or CPU at all, it should be able to use it for whatever purpose it chooses; it isn't like a locked-down system where you could only access the upgraded specs in limited contexts through some kind of driver or abstraction layer.
  • Conclusion: although this topic necessarily involves a good bit of speculation regarding the future, based on a reasoned consideration of the best information out there, it makes the most sense to conclude that DSi-exclusive retail games could make full use of the more powerful hardware of the DSi. Whether they actually do so or not, however, depends greatly on the developers themselves and their willingness going forward to throw development funding at retail releases that a good portion of the DS install base will not be able to play. That practical question remains to be answered.
  • Additional conclusion: what AlexSays lacks in arguments and reasoning, he more than makes up for in brazen self-certainty.

Twitter is a good place to throw your nonsense.
Wii FC: 8378 9716 1696 8633 || "How can mushrooms give you extra life? Get the green ones." -

IAmNotWill

The DSi obviously. DSiVC WILL come. Give it some time. As for lost of GBA slot, so? Solution to that is use your old GBA. I only have 1 GBA game, even though its one of the best GBA games (Fire Emblem), and I barely play it. And when I do play it, I can just use my sisters old Lite.

And ouch AlexSays. You need to do your research.

Edited on by IAmNotWill

Why can't Metroid crawl?
My Backloggery | Helpful Tips for Formatting Messages | NintendoLife Chat
...

3DS Friend Code: 0001-3392-4205 | Nintendo Network ID: willfuture

y2josh

The real question is... is the DSi worth the 170$. In my opinion no. If everyone else would have thought the same way they would have lowered the price quicker... and they would have made the new handheld they pushed back, because the DSi done so great, which will have the same features that the DSi upgraded to I'm sure. Had to throw in my other 2 cents.

y2josh

Victoria

It's like comparing 2 different makes/models of a car. Some have features that appeal so some people, and some have other features. If you don't like the features of the new model, get over it. Why do people still feel the need to gripe at us that have moved on?

My Art Academy artwork can be viewed here: My Gallery

Raptor78

Jerichoholic+Josh wrote:

The real question is... is the DSi worth the 170$. In my opinion no. If everyone else would have thought the same way they would have lowered the price quicker... and they would have made the new handheld they pushed back, because the DSi done so great, which will have the same features that the DSi upgraded to I'm sure. Had to throw in my other 2 cents.

As far as I was aware the story around the new handheld they pushed back had been refered to the time when Nintendo considerd having a gaming trinity which consisted of The home console, the gameboy and the DS. But due to the success of the DS and NOT the DSi the evolution of the GBA was pushed back. They hadnt relised exactly how well the DS was going to be accepted and were planning on continuing the Gameboy.
The DSi was concieved shortly after the wii was released with the idea that the wii was for groups of gamers and familys where as the DSi was suppposed to be something personal and individual.
As far as price goes, in the UK the price difference was about the price of a game and the 1000 nintendo points acted as a nice bonus and now that the Black DSi / Proffesor Layton package is out for the same price as the original DSi it really isnt as pricey as people think.

This comes from a proud current owner of original see through GBA, a couple of SP's, Silver Phat DS, a white DS Lite and of course a white DSi.

3DS Friend Code: 2621 - 2654 - 6355

OnLive Player Tag: Raptor78

Heroes of Ruin online profile -
http://heroesofruin.com/profile/Raptor1978

http://passid.ca/raptor

currently playing: Heroes of Ruin

Nintendo Network ID: Raptor78

Rensch

I haven't found anything that makes the DSi a viable purchase for me after getting the DS Lite, which I only got because the classic one was broken.

The DSiWare stuff mostly sucks big time. Clocks and Calculators.... yeah....cool....NOT. The only thing that looked cool was the new Mario vs. DK. But I already played Mario vs. DK 2 and the new game seemed much more of a level pack rather than a new game.

I don't care about camera's and all that stuff, but I do care about being able to play my big pile of old GBA games.

If you do not already own a DS Lite I guess its not really worth it. At least not if you want to play GBA games.

If they add a proper "Virtual Handheld" on the other hand, the story will be entirely different. That would just kick ass. But for now, I do not have a reason to buy a DSi.

Friend code 3DS: 4210-4747-2358

SMEXIZELDAMAN

I have a dsi and i like waaaay betetr than a ds lite. Also my battery has never been on red since i got it and i dont charge it much either. It is super awesome and with no gba slot it doesnt matter. the gba was like backup wen ds first came out cuz nintendo didnt no if ds would b good. now they no and dont need back up. also no one is forcing you to upgade so dont whien about it..im just saying i LOVE MY DSI

Check out SUBLIME GAMER, my YouTube Channel
God loves you

ToadFan

The Dsi is way beter.

ToadFan

LinktotheFuture

Right now, it is up to personal preference, but when the DSiVC is launched, it will be hard for me to believe that the DS Lite would still be considered superior.

The chickens are restless.
3DS Friend Code: 1547-5282-6926

MetalMario

Rensch wrote:

I haven't found anything that makes the DSi a viable purchase for me after getting the DS Lite, which I only got because the classic one was broken.

The DSiWare stuff mostly sucks big time. Clocks and Calculators.... yeah....cool....NOT. The only thing that looked cool was the new Mario vs. DK. But I already played Mario vs. DK 2 and the new game seemed much more of a level pack rather than a new game.

I don't care about camera's and all that stuff, but I do care about being able to play my big pile of old GBA games.

If you do not already own a DS Lite I guess its not really worth it. At least not if you want to play GBA games.

If they add a proper "Virtual Handheld" on the other hand, the story will be entirely different. That would just kick ass. But for now, I do not have a reason to buy a DSi.

I think the "Virtual Handheld" would be the only reason I would need a DSi. I've never played the Game Boy Zeldas.

and MVDK2 was fun, but I'm not getting a DSi just to get the DSiWare MVDK. Besides, the first MVDK for GBA was the best in my opinion. I can play that on my DS Lite.

Edited on by MetalMario

MetalMario

Nintendo Network ID: MetalMario64

deadly_by_design

Long-story-short, the DSi isn't "better enough" for me to buy another handheld. DSiWare could be nice, in theory, but it's irksome that we existing DS/Lite owners are excluded from that. It would be like Microsoft releasing a new XBox with minimal hardware upgrades (lol, camera?), and only this new system could access XBL2 for downloadable content.

That being said, the DSi is a nice improvement to the system. It's just a shame that they're making such a big deal about it.

Edited on by deadly_by_design

deadly_by_design

Old_School

Roopa132 wrote:

The DSi has 133 Mhz CPU that's double as much as the previous ones.
And it has 16 MB RAM four times as much as the previous ones...

I don't really know if this really has to do with games but it has better hardware so maybe....

Actuall the 67 ARM Chip was upgraded to 133 Mhz, it still has the ARM 7 at 33.

As with everything in live, beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder. One man's trash and all. I do not play GBA anymore so the DSi is a better fit. Now if they offered a VC, yes, I would download, but I enjoy the larger screens and menu more than the DSlite. If you like GBA, then the lite is a better choice. IMO
Untitled

Edited on by Old_School

Vegeta: Just...just...transform damn you...
Bulma: We are going to have a penthouse sweet...and he'll drive a corvet...and we will make love every single...
Zarbon: (transforms)
Bulma: KILL IT WITH FIRE!

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.