81unrandomsamWed 2nd Oct 2013 CanisWolfred wrote: unrandomsam wrote: CanisWolfred wrote: I think Nintendo knows exactly how much money they'd make off of any VC stuff...hence why it's no longer a priority for them. <_< I don't think that is the reason. If they released any of the good GBA stuff on VC then it would destroy sales of pretty much all the mediocre download only junk on the eshop. You got a better theory then? If it's it's so damn profitable, why aren't they putting even the smallest amount of effort into it? Why do they so rarely advertise it? And Why aren't they getting more developers onboard? The cost of doing it would be next to nothing. There is no way it would cost more than it would make therefore there has to be another reason. (You do it once correctly you can just pump the games out like D4 did with the Neo Geo. They could just get them to do it they are very good at it). There is probably 50 GBA games I would rather have than any of the eshop none retail download titles that I don't have. They want 3rd parties on the platform because they don't produce enough games. (They only have one none Japanese studio - Retro). But they spend 82 million $ on worthless advertising. If they just looked back for all the Earthbound's i.e games that are priced extremely highly used and had about 20 most of that money that is currently not going to Nintendo would go to them. What Capcom would do is dump the whole back catalog on in an extremely short period of time I am not suggesting doing that. Just put some stuff from before everything was dumbed down or in genre's they have no intention of making a new game in. “30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure” Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.