Topic: Will 3DS graphics get better than RE: Revelations?

Or is that the best the system can do?

oh it will, the wiis best graphics were thought to be SSBB and look at RE Darkside and MH3
but then again... what does good graphics mean anyway?

Yes.

it means the graphics? you know those? they're good.

RE: Darkside Chronicles was a rail shooter. It's basically and interactive movie. I thought Monster Hunter Tri was ugly with it's muddy textures and low resolution.

Pretty sure the resolution was 480p. Same as a lot of other Wii games.

Even Iwata said it was the Wii's best looking game.

I think Star Fox has the been 3DS graphics from what I've seen. RE and MGS and Uprising are after that.

It's quite possible that as developers get more accustomed to the 3DS's graphical capabilities, the graphics will improve to be "better" than the current best graphics for the 3DS. I use better in quotes because with art style variances and the depth to which the 3D effect is used, it's really hard to call one set of great graphics better than another.

I'm talking about how the textures in MHTri look muddier and lower-res than Smash Bros. and Mario Galaxy.

Of course it will. Look at the DS, even though the 3D was limited games kept getting better and better looking because developers learnt how to optimise the graphics for the DS. I think we've already seen Resi: Revelations get better and better every couple of months.

The DS is a bad example. It's basically a portable PS1, and PS1 graphics had the same pixelated textures and low-polygon models. I haven't seen any DS games that looks miles better than Super Mario 64 DS.

But you understand that they aren't lower-res, which is zezzy's point. Muddier is in the eye of the beholder, I guess, and he also covered that with "Iwata thinks they're darn awesome".

Three examples for this year: Okamiden, Solatorobo, Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker 2. They all wipe the floor with SM64DS.

RE Revelations looks crap though?

Oh wait, another person has confused "graphics" with "polygons."

Good graphics are aesthetics. So far, that's Ocarina of Time.

Also, how's about you answer your own question for a change. Go look at the video for Metal Gear Solid, Animal Crossing or Mario again.

Yes. The 3DS is (hopefully) still early in it's life cycle, and most consoles don't get their best-looking games until about 3-4 years in.

EDIT: On a side note, this is getting ridiculous, Mr. Tendoboy. How many threads is this in the past 3 weeks? 25+? Just calm down and think about some things. We don't need to see a new thread by you every day.

Monster Hunter Tri G is supposed to look better than even the Wii version, so I'd say definitely, though I don't know what RE's graphics look like.

YES, THEY WILL.

Um, polygons and textures are what 3D graphics are made of. I'm talking about "better graphics" in the sense of being more realistic, with better textures and higher polygonal models.

Silly, pointless topic then. People should judge graphics on the aesthetic value of the game, rather than an arbitrary number that means nothing, since graphics only exist to look good, and there are PS3 games well beyond the ability of the 3DS that look terrible.

That looks amazing.