LordJumpMad wrote:

Looks legit to me.

kkslider5552000 wrote:

wouldn't gen 6 be the bridge generation. It's coming out only a year later after B/W 2 and seems to be adding the least new Pokemon of a generation ever.

Arcamenel wrote:

Where are people getting this "least number of new Pokemon" stuff from. The only thing I've read on multiple sites is that there will be at LEAST 50. Not just 50. Not no more than 50. AT LEAST. It could very well give us the most yet.

Emaan wrote:

kkslider5552000 wrote:

wouldn't gen 6 be the bridge generation. It's coming out only a year later after B/W 2 and seems to be adding the least new Pokemon of a generation ever.

While I sort of agree. Gen 6 is adding new to the series beyond just new Pokemon. It's a major visual leap for the series, not to mention the Real Play feature seems interesting. That, and all the other 3DS capabilities implemented such as Street Pass and Spot Pass will really push the Pokemon series forward like never before.

We could be proven wrong, in the sense that, perhaps a new generation doesn't always have to be classified as dumping heaps of new Pokemon designs on us. Maybe a little more new Pokemon than what we know would be great, but the improvements present here in X and Y seem to be more than enough to justify there being new games.

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Emaan wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Perhaps you should look over the screens of each generation and then confirm how this wasn't much of a graphical leap...

TheLilK98 wrote:

Emaan wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Perhaps you should look over the screens of each generation and then confirm how this wasn't much of a graphical leap...

I saw the trailer the day it came out. As I said before, it's the same engine with cell shading. It's not impressive at all. GameFreak should've hired someone else to take care of visuals, they don't have the skills.

EDIT: I'm talking about from Gen 5 to Gen 6, 4 and below are irrelevant.

L-Lawliet wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

Emaan wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Perhaps you should look over the screens of each generation and then confirm how this wasn't much of a graphical leap...

I saw the trailer the day it came out. As I said before, it's the same engine with cell shading. It's not impressive at all. GameFreak should've hired someone else to take care of visuals, they don't have the skills.

EDIT: I'm talking about from Gen 5 to Gen 6, 4 and below are irrelevant.

If they were using the same engine, do you know how pixely/crappy it would look?

Retro_on_theGo wrote:

I love Chespin. Someone already mentioned it but it's so adorable how it looks just like if he wasn't going to be the starter but said "oh heck no!" and got himself a little leaf hat to sneak in and become the grass starter! X3
Froakie's still number one though baby!

TheLilK98 wrote:

L-Lawliet wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

Emaan wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Perhaps you should look over the screens of each generation and then confirm how this wasn't much of a graphical leap...

I saw the trailer the day it came out. As I said before, it's the same engine with cell shading. It's not impressive at all. GameFreak should've hired someone else to take care of visuals, they don't have the skills.

EDIT: I'm talking about from Gen 5 to Gen 6, 4 and below are irrelevant.

If they were using the same engine, do you know how pixely/crappy it would look?

Let me reiterate. An updated version of the same engine. and it still looks pixilated.

L-Lawliet wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

L-Lawliet wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

Emaan wrote:

TheLilK98 wrote:

I wouldn't call it a major leap visually. It's the same engine with cell shading.

Perhaps you should look over the screens of each generation and then confirm how this wasn't much of a graphical leap...

I saw the trailer the day it came out. As I said before, it's the same engine with cell shading. It's not impressive at all. GameFreak should've hired someone else to take care of visuals, they don't have the skills.

EDIT: I'm talking about from Gen 5 to Gen 6, 4 and below are irrelevant.

If they were using the same engine, do you know how pixely/crappy it would look?

Let me reiterate. An updated version of the same engine. and it still looks pixilated.

Have you played OoT 3D? They're both just as pixilated.
Either way, we can't say anything about it anyway, seeing as of how we have ten months until we can actually play the freaking game. This argument is pretty pointless.