Dont take him serious he's not actually bashing Nintendo, he's poking fun of what Sony Fanboys and Sony's JackTretton (hence his name) does

You mean that's not really Jack Tretton?

@MiracleBlaze, I'm not a Sony fanboy, but Vita is already generations ahead of 3DS, and current 3DS games are terrible and few. These are facts. And if you need arguments, go and get the specs of both devices and compare them, then go and the get the list of near 80 (80, not 8) games under development for Vita and compare it with what we have for 3DS after half of a year and what we might expect to have before 2012, and finally, get the list of game devs that already have a strong position to support Vita and compare it with these openly supporting 3DS.

No, it's kind of like when kids sit on Santa's lap, but it's not really Santa.

Cubic Ninja, people.

@MiracleBlaze

We'll this isn't really news.. I mean they stated that the 3D was just an option just like the mic, touchscreen or camera. Cubic Ninja was a game that was announced pretty early on and that game skipped the 3D as a whole.

Alright, then. Maybe they should start calling it the, "Nintendo (Sometimes 3D) 3DS", or the "3½DS". That's really pointless and disappointing. I mean, I know lots of people never use the 3D, but on the other hand there are people who do I like it (like me). It really is kind of depressing for Nintendo to say that, even though 3D seems the main feature of the system (since it's obviously in the name). But, they made the system, they can do what they want with it, I guess...

Basically, if a game makes extensive use of the system's motion control features, it probably shouldn't be in 3D. Cubic Ninja and Pac-Man Tilt are two examples of games that were made with no 3D capability.

Nintendo's philosophy is to try to give developers as many tools as possible to work with, then choose the tools that fit the game. The 3D will be a feature of most games, but not all.

/thread

Agreed.

Did some of you actually read the article?

They aren't just saying no 3d. They are saying if a company doesn't want to use the 3d they don't have to. He wants them to also focus on other parts of the console like gyro scope. That's why nintendo may not use 3d on certain games. Because a) they may not need it and b) to focus on other 3ds features. He doesn't want companies to just use 3d like companies just used wii for waggle.

Well in this case it doesnt matter what you think is true. Fact is what I said is true and if you spent two minutes on Google you would see it.

Hey guys, here's some news. I'm gonna post it here, though I don't care what you think my words the truth.

Guys let's be for real for real here. Vita >>>>>>3DS. If they aren't gonna make games in 3D might as well just get a Vita it's gonna roxorz! 3DS doesn't have new CoD!!!!!

@Apollo: Not all DS games used the touch screen. Not all Wii games used the motion controls. They're doing just fine. Not all games on the 3DS absolutely need 3D. End of story.

But the Wii does, so Wii > everything!!

But Game Gear > Wii

Yea I'll have to admit Wii>>>Vita>>>>>>>3DS Wii has Halo too so that's +1 for Wii. I'm really hoping for a Halo 3DS. That might be just what 3DS needz to pwn Vita trolololol!

You know, I heard Nintendo made some DS games that didn't use the touch screen. What the heck? I bought my DS for the touch screen. If a game didn't use it, it automatically sucked and I refused to play it.

Ended up getting a PSP, and had the same problem. Why the heck didn't all of the games use the nub? It's maddening, I tell you.